Track ii diplomacy, or unofficial interactions designed to produce ideas, build relationships, and change perceptions, has become a supplement – and sometimes an alternative – to traditional diplomacy. Yet practitioners and scholars still debate its effectiveness. Practitioners claim that Track ii diplomacy promotes peace but insist that its contributions are intangible and therefore difficult to assess empirically. Meanwhile, scholars maintain that only rigorous empirical evaluation can demonstrate the effect of Track ii diplomacy on conflict outcomes. This study seeks to break this impasse in two ways. First, it provides a comprehensive explanation of why Track ii practitioners object to evaluation, drawing on personal interviews conducted in eight countries. Second, it proposes a new evaluation framework, which we call the “Process Peace” approach, which better balances practitioner and scholarly equities. Our framework should appeal to readers interested in bridging the gap between the practice and theory of Track ii diplomacy.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Agha Hussein , Feldman Shai , Khalidi Ahmad & Schiff Zeev Track-II Diplomacy: Lessons from the Middle East 2003 Cambridge, MA The MIT Press
Allen Nathaniel , Badr Rashad , Brown Chris , Burns Thomas , Einhaus Lindsey , Merkl Kathleen , Misra Mayank , Sharp Travis , Smith Seth , Utsey Alexandra & Wagner William Bridging Divides: Track II Diplomacy in the Middle East 2014 Princeton, NJ Woodrow Wilson School Policy Research Report
Azar Edward & Burton John International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice 1986 Boulder, CO Lynne Reiner
Babbitt Eileen F. “The Evolution of International Conflict Resolution: From Cold War to Peacebuilding” Negotiation Journal 2009 25 4 539 549
Bakaki Zorzeta , Böhmelt Tobias & Bove Vincenzo “Barriers to Coordination? Examining the Impact of Culture on International Mediation Occurrence and Effectiveness” Political Studies 2016 doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12199
Baker Judy Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners. Directions in Development 2000 Washington, DC World Bank
Ball Desmond , Milner Anthony & Taylor Brendan “Track 2 Security Dialogue in the Asia-Pacific: Reflections and Future Directions” Asian Security 2006 2 3 174 188
Bartoli Andrea Crocker Chester , Hampson Fen Osler & Aall Pamela “Mediating Peace in Mozambique: The Role of the Community of Sant’Egidio” Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World 1999 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace
Bass Jossey , Clark Heléne & Taplin Dana Theory of Change Basics: A Primer on Theory of Change 2012 New York Actknowledge
Beardsley Kyle “Agreement without Peace? International Mediation and Time Inconsistency Problems” American Journal of Political Science 2008a 52 4 723 740
Beardsley Kyle “New Approaches to Resolving Old Conflicts” International Studies Review 2008b 10 3 647 648
Beardsley Kyle The Mediation Dilemma 2011 Ithaca Cornell University Press
Beber Bernd “International Mediation, Selection Effects, and the Question of Bias” Conflict Management and Peace Science 2012 29 4 397 424
Bercovitch Jacob & Langley Jeffrey “The Nature of the Dispute and the Effectiveness of International Mediation” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1993 37 4 670 691
Bercovitch Jacob & Gartner Scott Sigmund “Empirical Studies in International Mediation: Introduction to a Special Issue of International Interactions” International Interactions 2006a 32 4 319 328
Bercovitch Jacob & Gartner Scott Sigmund “Is There Method in the Madness of Mediation? Some Lessons for Mediators from Quantitative Studies of Mediation” International Interactions 2006b 32 4 329 354
Bloom Howard S. Learning More from Social Experiments 2005 New York Russell Sage Foundation
Böhmelt Tobias “International Mediation and Social Networks: The Importance of Indirect Ties” International Interactions 2009 35 3 298 319
Böhmelt Tobias “The Effectiveness of Tracks of Diplomacy Strategies in Third-Party Interventions” Journal of Peace Research 2010 47 2 167 178
Böhmelt Tobias “Disaggregating Mediations: The Impact of Multiparty Mediation” British Journal of Political Science 2011 41 4 859 881
Brewer Garry D. “The Policy Sciences Emerge: To Nurture and Structure a Discipline” Policy Sciences 1974 5 3 239 244
Capie David “When Does Track Two Matter? Structure, Agency and Asian Regionalism” Review of International Political Economy 2010 17 2 291 318
Church Cheyanne & Shouldice Julie The Evaluation of Conflict Resolution Interventions: Framing the State of Play 2002 Derry/Londonberry, UK Initiative on Conflict Resolution and Ethnicity
Church Cheyanne & Shouldice Julie Evaluation of Conflict Resolution Interventions, Part II: Emerging Practice and Theory 2003 Derry/Londonderry Initiative on Conflict Resolution and Ethnicity
Cook Thomas D. , Campbell Donald Thomas & Day Arles Quasi-Experimentation: Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings 1979 Boston Houghton Mifflin
Corell Elisabeth & Betsill Michele M. Betsill Michele M. & Corell Elisabeth “Analytical Framework: Assessing the Influence of NGO Diplomats” NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations 2008 Cambridge, MA The MIT Press
Çuhadar Esra “Assessing Transfer from Track Two Diplomacy: The Cases of Water and Jerusalem” Journal of Peace Research 2009 46 5 641 658
Çuhadar Esra & Dayton Bruce W. “Oslo and Its Aftermath: Lessons Learned from Track Two Diplomacy” Negotiation Journal 2012 28 2 155 179
Çuhadar Gürkaynak Esra , Dayton Bruce W. & Paffenholz Thania Sandole Dennis J. D. , Byrne Sean , Sandole-Staroste Ingrid & Senehi Jessica “Evaluation in Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding” Handbook of Conflict Analysis and Resolution 2009 New York Routledge
Davidson William D. & Montville Joseph V. “Foreign Policy According to Freud” Foreign Policy 1981 45 145 157
D’Estrée Tamra Pearson , Fast Larissa A. , Weiss Joshua N. & Jakobsen Monica S. “Changing the Debate about ‘Success’ in Conflict Resolution Efforts” Negotiation Journal 2001 17 2 101 113
Diamond Louise and John W. McDonald Multi-Track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to Peace 1996 West Hartford, CT Kumarian Press
Doob Leonard W. & Foltz William J. “The Belfast Workshop: An Application of Group Techniques to a Destructive Conflict” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1973 17 3 489 512
Duflo Esther , Glennerster Rachel & Kremer Michael “Randomized Evaluations of Interventions in Social Science Delivery” Development Outreach 2004 Washington, DC World Bank
Egeland Jan Crocker Chester , Hampson Fen Osler & Aall Pamela “The Oslo Accord: Multiparty Facilitation through the Norwegian Channel” Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World 1999 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace
Fast Larissa A. & Neufeldt Reina C. “Envisioning Success: Building Blocks for Strategic and Comprehensive Peacebuilding Impact Evaluation” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 2005 2 2 24 41
Fisher Ronald J. Davies John & Kaufman Edward (Edy) “Historical Mapping of the Field of Interactive Conflict Resolution” Second Track/Citizens’ Diplomacy 2002 Lanham, MD Rowman & Littlefield
Fisher Ronald J. Paving the Way: Contributions of Interactive Conflict Resolution to Peacemaking 2005 Lanham, MD Lexington Books
Fisher Ronald J. “Coordination between Track Two and Track One Diplomacy in Successful Cases of Prenegotiation” International Negotiation 2006 11 1 65 89
Fisher Ronald J. “Transfer Effects from Track Two Diplomacy: Toward a Process and Outcome Model” 2014 Paper presented at the workshop “Transfer and Track Two Diplomacy” March 20–21, 2014 Stanford University
Fitzgerald Keith Smock David “Georgian-Ossetian Joint Brainstorming” Private Peacemaking: USIP-Assisted Peacemaking Projects of Nonprofit Organizations 1998 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace
Funnell Sue & Rogers Patricia Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models 2011 San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass
Gent Stephen E. & Shannon Megan “Decision Control and the Pursuit of Binding Conflict Management: Choosing the Ties that Bind” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2011 55 5 710 734
Greig Michael J. & Diehl Paul F. International Mediation 2012 Cambridge Polity
Groves Rowley Lori Email interview 2013 September 27 2013
Haass Richard N. Conflicts Unending 1990 New Haven, CT Yale University Press
Heckman James J. & Vytlacil E. J. Heckman James J. & Leamer Edward E. “Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs” Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 6 2006 Amsterdam North Holland
Hellman Johan “The Occurrence of Mediation: A Critical Evaluation of the Current Debate” International Studies Review 2012 14 4 591 603
Hirschfeld Yair Track-Two Diplomacy toward an Israeli-Palestinian Solution, 1978–2014 2014 Washington, DC Woodrow Wilson Center Press
Hottinger Julian Thomas Ricigliano Robert “The Relationship between Track One and Track Two Diplomacy” Choosing to Engage: Armed Groups and Peace Processes 2005 London Conciliation Resources
Jones Peter Interview 2013 October 7 2013
Jones Peter “U.S. – Iran Nuclear Track Two from 2005 to 2011: What Have We Learned? Where Are We Going?” Negotiation Journal 2014 30 4 347 366
Jones Peter Track Two Diplomacy: In Theory and Practice 2015 Stanford, CA Stanford University Press
Kaye Dalia Dassa Talking to the Enemy: Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia 2007 Santa Monica, CA RAND Corporation
Kaye Dalia Dassa Interview 2013 October 21 2013
Kellen David , Bekerman Zvi & Maoz Ifat “An Easy Coalition: The Peacecamp Identity and Israeli – Palestinian Track Two Diplomacy” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2012 57 4 543 569
Kelman Herbert C. “Negotiation as Interactive Problem Solving” International Negotiation 1996 1 1 99 123
Kelman Herbert C. “Some Determinants of the Oslo Breakthrough” International Negotiation 1997 2 2 183 194
Kelman Herbert C. “The Role of the Scholar‐Practitioner in International Conflict Resolution” International Studies Perspectives 2000 1 3 273 287
Kelman Herbert C. “Evaluating the Contributions of Interactive Problem Solving to the Resolution of Ethnonational Conflicts” Peace and Conflict 2008 14 1 29 60
King Gary , Keohane Robert O. & Verba Sidney Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research 1994 Princeton Princeton University Press
Kleiboer Marieke “Understanding Success and Failure of International Mediation” Journal of Conflict Resolution 1996 40 2 360 389
Koepke Bruce Interview 2013 October 30 2013
Kydd Andrew “Which Side Are You On? Bias, Credibility, and Mediation” American Journal of Political Science 2003 47 4 597 611
Lasswell Harold D. The Decision Process 1956 College Park University of Maryland Press
Lechner Michael & Miquel Ruth “Identification of the Effects of Dynamic Treatments by Sequential Conditional Independence Assumptions” Empirical Economics 2010 39 1 111 137
Lieberfeld Daniel Talking with the Enemy: Negotiation and Threat Perception in South Africa and Israel/Palestine 1999 Westport, CT Praeger
Lieberfeld Daniel “Evaluating the Contributions of Track-Two Diplomacy to Conflict Termination in South Africa, 1984–90” Journal of Peace Research 2002 39 3 355 372
Lieberfeld Daniel “Promoting Tractability in South Africa and Israel/Palestine: The Role of Semiofficial Meetings” American Behavioral Scientist 2007 50 11 1542 1562
Lundgren Magnus & Svensson Isak “Leanings and Dealings: Exploring Bias and Trade Leverage in Civil War Mediation by International Organizations” International Negotiation 2014 19 2 315 342
Malhotra Deepak and Sumanasiri Liyanage “Long-Term Effects of Peace Workshops in Protracted Conflicts” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2005 49 6 908 924
Mitchell Christopher R. “Evaluating Conflict” Journal of Peace Research 1980 17 1 61 75
Montville Joseph V. McDonald J. W. & Bendahmane D. B. “The Arrow and the Olive Branch: A Case for Track Two Diplomacy” Conflict Resolution: Track Two Diplomacy 1987 Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office
Montville Joseph V. “Track Two Diplomacy: The Work of Healing History” The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 2006 7 2 15 25
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research 1978 dhew Publication No. (os) 78-0012
norad The Logical Framework Approach: Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Planning 1999 Fourth Edition Oslo Norwegian Development Cooperation
Oetzel John G. & Ting-Toomey Stella The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice 2006 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications
Orr Larry L. Social Experiments: Evaluating Public Programs with Experimental Methods 1999 London Sage Publications
Paffenholz Thania & Reychler Luc “Towards Better Policy and Programme Work in Conflict Zones: Introducing the ‘Aid for Peace’ Approach” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 2005 2 2 6 23
Parsons Jim , Gokey Caitlin & Thornton Monica Indicators of Inputs, Activities, Outputs, Outcomes, and Impacts in Security and Justice Programming 2013 New York Vera Institute of Justice
Pedersen Jon Interview 2013 October 28 2013
Ross Marc H. “Action Evaluation in the Theory and Practice of Conflict Resolution” Peace and Conflict Studies 2001 8 1 1 15
Rossi Peter H. , Lipsey Mark W. & Freeman Howard E. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach 1999 Thousand Oaks, CA Sage Publications
Rothman Jay “Action-Evaluation and Conflict Resolution: In Theory and Practice” Mediation Quarterly 1997 15 2 119 131
Rothman Jay and Victor J. Friedman Davies John & Kaufman Edward (Edy) “Action Evaluation for Conflict Management Organizations and Projects” Second Track/Citizens’ Diplomacy 2002 Lanham, MD Rowman & Littlefield
Rouhana Nadim N. “Unofficial Third‐Party Intervention in International Conflict: Between Legitimacy and Disarray” Negotiation Journal 1995 1 3 255 270
Rouhana Nadim N. Stern Paul C. & Druckman Daniel “Interactive Conflict Resolution: Issues in Theory, Methodology and Evaluation” International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War 2000 Washington, DC National Academies Press
Saunders Harold H. “Sustained Dialogue in Managing Intractable Conflict” Negotiation Journal 2003 19 1 85 95
Saunders Harold H. Sustained Dialogue in Conflicts: Transformation and Change 2011 New York Palgrave Macmillan
Saunders Harold H. Interview 2013 September 30 2013
Saunders Harold H. , Diamond Louise , Kelman Herbert C. , Marks John , Montville Joseph V. & Volkan Vamık Stern Paul C. & Druckman Daniel “Interactive Conflict Resolution: A View for Policymakers on Making and Building Peace” International Conflict Resolution after the Cold War 2000 Washington, DC National Academies Press
Schmidt Terry Strategic Project Management Made Simple: Practical Tools for Leaders and Teams 2009 Hoboken, NJ Wiley Online
Shadish William R. , Cook Thomas D. & Campbell Donald T. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference 2002 Boston Houghton Mifflin
Sharp Travis “Loose Change: U.S. Spending on Track II Diplomacy” 2013 Princeton University Working Paper
Smock David Private Peacemaking: USIP-Assisted Peacemaking Projects of Nonprofit Organizations 1998 Washington, DC United States Institute of Peace
Stedman Stephen J. Peacemaking in Civil War: International Mediation in Zimbabwe, 1974–1980 1991 Boulder, CO Lynne Reinner
Stern Paul C. & Druckman Daniel “Evaluating Interventions in History: The Case of International Conflict Resolution” International Studies Review 2000 2 1 33 63
Svensson Isak “Who Brings Which Peace? Neutral versus Biased Mediation and Institutional Peace Arrangements in Civil Wars” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2009 53 3 446 469
Svensson Isak International Mediation Bias and Peacemaking: Taking Sides in Civil Wars 2015 New York Routledge
Svensson Isak & Lindgren Mathilda “Peace from the Inside: Exploring the Role of the Insider-Partial Mediator” International Interactions 2013 39 5 698 722
Themnér Lotta & Wallensteen Peter “Armed Conflicts 1946–2012” Journal of Peace Research 2013 50 4 509 521
Van Evera Stephen Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science 1997 Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press
Waage Hilde Interview 2013 October 29 2013
Wallensteen Peter & Svensson Isak “Talking Peace: International Mediation in Armed Conflicts” Journal of Peace Research 2014 51 2 315 327
Walton Richard E. “A Problem-Solving Workshop on Border Conflicts in Eastern Africa” Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences 1970 6 4 453 489
Weible Christopher M. Sabatier Paul A. & Weible Christipher M. “Introducing the Scope and Focus of Policy Process Research and Theory” Theories of the Policy Process 2014 Third Edition Boulder, CO Westview Press
White Howard & Phillips Daniel “Addressing Attribution of Cause and Effect in Small-n Impact Evaluations: Towards an Integrated Framework” 2012 New Delhi International Initiative for Impact Evaluation
Wilkenfeld Jonathan , Young Kathleen , Asal Victor & Quinn David “Mediating International Crises: Cross-National and Experimental Perspectives” Journal of Conflict Resolution 2003 47 3 279 301
Wood Elisabeth J. “The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones” Qualitative Sociology 2006 29 3 307 341
Zartman I. William Ripe for Resolution: Conflict and Intervention in Africa 1985 New York Oxford University Press
Zartman I. William Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority 1995 Boulder, CO Lynne Rienner
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1996 | 377 | 37 |
Full Text Views | 491 | 46 | 6 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 479 | 102 | 13 |
Track ii diplomacy, or unofficial interactions designed to produce ideas, build relationships, and change perceptions, has become a supplement – and sometimes an alternative – to traditional diplomacy. Yet practitioners and scholars still debate its effectiveness. Practitioners claim that Track ii diplomacy promotes peace but insist that its contributions are intangible and therefore difficult to assess empirically. Meanwhile, scholars maintain that only rigorous empirical evaluation can demonstrate the effect of Track ii diplomacy on conflict outcomes. This study seeks to break this impasse in two ways. First, it provides a comprehensive explanation of why Track ii practitioners object to evaluation, drawing on personal interviews conducted in eight countries. Second, it proposes a new evaluation framework, which we call the “Process Peace” approach, which better balances practitioner and scholarly equities. Our framework should appeal to readers interested in bridging the gap between the practice and theory of Track ii diplomacy.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1996 | 377 | 37 |
Full Text Views | 491 | 46 | 6 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 479 | 102 | 13 |