Federalism and Liberalization: Evaluating the Impact of American and Canadian Sub-federal Governments on the Negotiation of International Trade Agreements

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


This article argues that federal systems in Canada and the United States allow for the successful pursuit of sub-federal offensive and defensive priorities in the negotiation of international trade agreements. It is also clear, however, that the coercive American intrastate system limits the relevance of American states in this process, especially when compared to Canada’s relatively cooperative interstate model. Canadian provinces and territories also benefit from ideational considerations, including policy expertise and trust-ties with federal negotiators, which further strengthens sub-federal legitimacy and influence in this policy area. This study evaluates the incremental and significant impact of Canadian and American sub-federal governments across a number of sectors on the negotiations and final legal texts of the Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement, the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Federalism and Liberalization: Evaluating the Impact of American and Canadian Sub-federal Governments on the Negotiation of International Trade Agreements

in International Negotiation



AndersonM.ASmithS., '“Canadian Provinces in World Trade: Engagement and Detachment”' (1999) 32(1) Canadian Journal of Economics: 22-38.

Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation“Overview of Services in RTA’s: Positive or Negative List?”2014Online athttp://mddb.apec.org/Documents/2014/CTI/WKSP5/14_cti_wksp5_010.pdf

D. Brown and E. Fry (eds), States and Provinces in the International Economy, (Institute of Governmental Studies Press and Queen’s University Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, Berkeley and Kingston 1993).

BurgessMichael, Comparative Federalism: Theory and Practice, (Routledge, New York 2006).

CairneyPaul, (2012) Understanding Public Policy: Theories and Issues.

CollinsD.Globalized Localism: Canada’s Procurement Commitments Under the CETA2015Online athttp://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2568629

DavisR., '“The Federal Principle Reconsidered”', in A. Wildavsky (ed), American Federalism in Perspective, (Little Brown, Boston 1967).

DestlerI.M., American Trade Politics, (Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC 2005).

I.D. Duchacek (ed), Perforated Sovereignties and International Relations: Trans-sovereign Contacts of Subnational Governments, (Greenwood Press, New York 1988).

European CommissionCETA: Summary of the Final Negotiating Results2014Online athttp://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/december/tradoc_152982.pdf

FarrellH., '“The Political Economy of the Internet and E-Commerce”', in Richard Stubbs and Geoffrey R.D. Underhill (eds), Political Economy and the Changing Global Order, (Oxford University Press, Don Mills, ON 2006).

FergusonIan F., The Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP): In Brief, (Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC 2015).

FergusonIan F., Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) and the Role of Congress in Trade Policy, (Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC 2016).

FromanMichael, 2014 Trade Policy Agenda and 2013 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program, (Office of the United States Trade Representative, Washington, DC 2014).

Global Affairs CanadaConsolidated TPP Text2015Online athttp://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/tpp-ptp/text-texte/toc-tdm.aspx?lang=eng

Global Affairs CanadaTPP Outcomes: By Sector2016Online athttp://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/tpp-ptp/benefits-avantages/index.aspx?lang=eng

Government of Canada, Opening New Markets in Europe Creating Jobs and Opportunities for Canadians., (Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa 2013).

Government of Canada, Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Creating Jobs and Opportunities for Canadians: Provincial and Territorial Benefits, (Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa 2014a).

Government of Canada, Canada-Korea Free Trade Agreement: Creating Jobs and Opportunities for Canadians, (Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa 2014b).

HartMichael M., A North American Free Trade Agreement, (Centre for Trade Policy and Law—The Institute for Research on Public Policy, Ottawa 1990).

HelliwellJohn F., How Much do National Borders Matter?, (Brookings Institution, Washington, DC 1998).

HueglinT.O.FennaA., Comparative Federalism: A Systemic Inquiry, (Broadview Press, Peterborough 2006).

HufbauerG. C.Cimino-IsaacsC., '“How will tpp and ttip Change the wto System?”' (2015) 18 Journal of International Economic Law: 679-696.

Intergovernmental Policy Advisory CommitteeThe US-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (TPA)2006Online athttp://www.ustr.gov/archive/assets/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/Colombia_FTA/Reports/asset_upload_file998_9828.pdf

KincaidJohn, '“From Cooperative to Coercive Federalism”' (1990) 509 The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science: 139-152.

KincaidJohn, '“Globalization and Federalism in the United States: Continuity in Adaptation”', in Harvey Lazar (ed), The Impact of Global and Regional Integration on Federal Systems: A Comparative Analysis, (McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal 2003).

KukuchaChristopher J., The Provinces and Canadian Foreign Trade Policy, (UBC Press, Vancouver 2008).

KukuchaChristopher J., '“Internal Trade Agreements in Canada: Progress, Complexity and Challenges”' (2015a) 48(1) Canadian Journal of Political Science : 195-218.

KukuchaChristopher J., '“Federalism Matters: Evaluating the Impact of Sub-federal Governments in Canadian and American Foreign Trade Policy”' (2015b) 21(3) Canadian Foreign Policy Journal: 224-237.

KukuchaChristopher J., '“Provincial/Territorial Governments and the Negotiation of International Trade Agreements”' (2016) 10 Institute for the Research on Public Policy (IRPP): Insights: 1-16.

LeblondPatrick“Canada Must Work with us Allies to Save nafta and our Future Welfare”Globe and Mail2016November14B-4

LoizidesS.RheaumeG., The North American Free Trade Agreement: Implications for Canada, (The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa 1993).

LoewensteinKarl, Political Power and the Governmental Process, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1965).

LysenkoD.SchwartzS., Does Canada Need Trade Adjustment Assistance?, (Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal 2015).

McMinimyMarkTPP: American Agriculture and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement2016Online athttps://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44337.pdf

Hans J. Michelmann (ed), Foreign Relations in Federal Countries, (McGill University Press, Montreal 2009).

H. J. Michelmann and P. Soldatos (eds), Federalism and International Relations: The Role of Subnational Units, (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1990).

MorozAndrew, '“Navigating the Maze: Canada, Rules of Origin and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (and Two Tales of Supply Chains)”', in Stephen Tapp (ed), Redesigning Canadian Trade Policies for New Global Realities, (IRPP, Montreal 2016)).

PangestuM.NellorD., '“A G-20 Agenda for the Global Trade Regime”', in Kemal Dervis and Peter Drysdale (eds), The G-20 Summit at Five: Time for Strategic Leadership, (The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC 2014).

PaquinStephane, '“Federalism and the Governance of International Trade Negotiations in Canada: Comparing CUSFTA and CETA”' (2013) 28(4) International Journal: 545-552.

J. Poirier, C. Saunders and J. Kincaid (eds), Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems, (Forum of Federations and International Association of Centres for Federal Studies, Ottawa 2016).

Public Citizen, NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor-to-State Cases: Bankrupting Democracy—Lessons for Fast Track and the Free Trade Area of the Americas, (Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch, Washington, DC 2001).

RobinsonIan, '“Neo-Liberal Trade Policy and Canadian Federalism Revisited”', in François Rocher and Smith (eds), New Trends in Canadian Federalism, (Broadview Press, Peterborough 2003).

SagerMichelle, One Voice or Many? Federalism and International Trade, (LFB Scholarly Publishing, New York 2002).

SimeonRichard, Federal-Provincial Diplomacy: The Making of Recent Policy in Canada, (University of Toronto Press, Toronto 2006).

SkogstadGrace, '“International Trade Policy and the Evolution of Canadian Federalism”', in Herman Bakvis and Grace Skogstad (eds), Canadian Federalism, (Oxford University Press, Don Mills 2012).

SmileyDonald V., '“The Structural Problem of Canadian Federalism”' (1971) 14(3) Canadian Public Administration: 326-343.

SmileyD. V.WattsR. L., Intrastate Federalism: Volume 39 Research Studies Prepared for the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada, (University of Toronto Press, Toronto 1985).

StumbergRobertMemorandum: WPDR Chairman’s Fourth Draft on Domestic Regulation 23 January2008Online athttp://www.iatp.org/files/451_2_101603.pdf

Trade Benefits AmericaTPP: Every States Opportunity2016Online athttps://www.tradebenefitsamerica.org/tpp-every-states-opportunity

Trans Pacific PartnershipAnnex 1 Non-Conforming Measures: Schedule of the United States2015aOnline athttp://www.mfat.govt.nz/downloads/trade-agreement/transpacific/TPP-text/Annex%20I.%20US.pdf

Trans Pacific PartnershipAnnex 2 Non-Conforming Measures: Schedule of the United States2015bOnline athttp://www.mfat.govt.nz/downloads/trade-agreement/transpacific/TPP-text/Annex%20II.%20US.pdf

Trans Pacific PartnershipAnnex 9-B Expropriation2015cOnline athttp://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/tpp-ptp/text-texte/09.aspx?lang=eng

United States CongressH.R. 3830: Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities Act of 20142014Online athttps://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/3830/text

United States Trade RepresentativeTPP Made in America: The Trans-Pacific Partnership2016Online athttps://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/TPP-Overall-US-Benefits-Fact-Sheet.pdf

WheareK.C., Federal Government, (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1967).


Telephone interview April 14 2016.


Personal interview October 17 2016.


Personal interview March 20 2015.


Personal interview July 23 2015.


Personal interview July 23 2015.


Personal interview March 20 2015.


Telephone interview April 14 2016.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 19 19 16
Full Text Views 7 7 6
PDF Downloads 2 2 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0