Mediation as Politics: How Nations Leverage Peace Engagements?

in International Negotiation
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



This study proposes a conceptual model that depicts middle power mediation as a foreign policy strategy in the context of asymmetric alliance dynamics. It expands on Touval’s (2003) mediation-as-foreign policy perspective and argues that once mediation is conceived of as a viable political option in the conduct of foreign policy, engaging in mediation activity enables middle powers to create an extra space of political power not otherwise available. The article introduces an analytical model that explains the dynamics of mediation-as-foreign policy approach and the mechanisms that translate mediation engagement into political leverage. The analysis focuses on aspects of Turkish mediation efforts between 2002 and 2009 in the context of Turkish-us/eu relations.

Mediation as Politics: How Nations Leverage Peace Engagements?

in International Negotiation



  • BarakatSultan (2014). “Qatari Mediation: Between Ambition and Achievement.” Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper 12.

  • BeardsleyKyle (2011). The Mediation Dilemma. New York: Cornell University Press.

  • BercovitchJacob and A. Houston (1996). “The Study of International Mediation: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence,” in Jacob Bercovitch editor Resolving International Conflicts: The Theory and Practice of Mediation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.

  • BerikerNimet (1995). “Mediating Regional Conflicts and Negotiating Flexibility: Peace Efforts in Bosnia-Herzegovina.” The Annals 542: 185201.

  • BerikerNimet (2009). “Conflict Resolution: The Missing Link between Liberal International Relations Theory and Realistic Practice,” in J. Dennis SandoleS. BryneI. Sandole-Staroste and J. Senehi editors Handbook of Conflict Analysis and Resolution. Abingdon: Routledge256271.

  • BerikerNimet (2014). “Introducing the fpc-tr Dataset: Dimensions of ak Party Foreign Policy.” Insight Turkey 163: 201211.

  • BerikerNimet (2016). “US Grand Strategy and Middle Power Foreign Policy: Turkey as a Mediator,” in Doga Ulas Eralp editor Turkey as a Mediator: Stories of Success and Failure. London: Lexington Books.

  • CooperAndrew F. (ed.) (1997). Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

  • CooperAndrew F.R. A. Higgott and K. R. Nossal (1993). Relocating Middle Powers: Australian and Canada in a Changing World Order. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

  • CooperDavid A. (2011). “Challenging Contemporary Notions of Middle Power Influence: Implications of the Proliferation Security Initiative for ‘Middle Power Theory.’ ” Foreign Policy Analysis 2: 317336.

  • CrockerChester A.F. O. Hampson and P. R. Aall (2003). “Ready for Prime Time: The When, Who, and Why of International Mediation.” Negotiation Journal 192: 151167.

  • DavutogluAhmet (2012). “Principles of Turkish Foreign Policy and Regional Political Structuring.” TEPAV Turkey Policy Brief Series.

  • DruckmanDaniel (1977). “Boundary Role Conflict: Negotiation as Dual Responsiveness.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 21: 639662.

  • DruckmanDaniel (1997). “Negotiating in the International Context,” in I. William Zartman editor Peacemaking in International Conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press81123.

  • FisherRoger and W. Ury (1981). Getting to Yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

  • FlemesDaniel (2007). “Emerging Middle Powers.” Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum. giga Working Papers57.

  • FrazierDerrick V. and R. Stewart-Ingersoll (2010). “Regional Powers and Security: A Framework for Understanding Order within Regional Security Complexes.” European Journal of International Relations 164: 731753.

  • GreigMichael J. and Paul F. Diehl (2012). International Mediation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • HiggottRichard A. (1997). “Issues, Institutions and Middle Power Diplomacy: Action and Agendas in the Post-Cold War Era,” in Andrew F. Cooper editor Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. New York: St. Martin’s Press2545.

  • IkléFred C. (1964). How Nations Negotiate. New York: Harper and Row.

  • KleiboerMarieke (1996). “Understanding Success and Failure of International Mediation.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 402: 360389.

  • LindenR.A. EvinK. Kirisci and N. Tocci (2012). Turkey and Its Neighbors. Foreign Relations in Transition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

  • MaundiMuhammed O.I. W. ZartmanG. Khadiagala and Nuamah Kwaku (2006). Getting In: Mediators Entry into the Settlement of African Conflicts. Washington, DCUSIP Press.

  • McKibbenElko Heather (2013). “The effects of structures and power on state bargaining strategies.” American Journal of Political Science 572: 411427.

  • MillerBenjamin (2005). “When and How Regions Become Peaceful: Potential Theoretical Pathways to Peace.” International Studies Review 7: 229267.

  • NeackL. (2000). “Middle Powers Once Removed: The Diminished Global Role of Middle Powers and American Grand Strategy.” Paper presented at the International Studies Association 41st Annual ConventionLos Angeles, CA.

  • NeackLaura (2008). The New Foreign Policy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

  • PopeHugh (2010). “Pax Ottomana? The Mixed Success of Turkey’s New Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 896.

  • PruittDean and J. Rubin (1994). Social Conflict Escalation Stalemate and Settlement. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • PrysMiriam (2010). “Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood.” International Studies Review 124: 479504.

  • PutnamRobert D. (1988). “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 423: 427460.

  • RavenhillJohn (1998). “Cycles of Middle Power Activism: Constraint and Choice in Australian and Canadian Foreign Policies.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 523: 309327.

  • SookJong Lee (2012). “South Korea as New Middle Power Seeking Complex Diplomacy.” East Asia Institute (EAI) Asia Security Initative Working Paper 25.

  • TaşpınarÖmer (2012). “Turkey: The New Model?” Brookings Institution.

  • TouvalSaadia (2003). “Mediation and Foreign Policy.” International Studies Review 54: 9195.

  • WallensteenPeter and I. Svensson (2014). “Talking peace: International mediation in armed conflicts.” Journal of Peace Research 512: 315327.


  • View in gallery
    Middle powers and mediation as foreign policy approach in international politics – for country x.
  • View in gallery
    Mediation, alliance dynamics and mechanisms to harness leverage


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 90 90 22
Full Text Views 215 215 52
PDF Downloads 9 9 3
EPUB Downloads 2 2 0