Mediating among Mediators: Building a Consensus in Multilateral Interventions

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The conditions under which multilateral international intervention are effective in ending a violent conflict is a critical question for scholars and practitioners. Scholarly studies have demonstrated the importance of a united intervention but have been in disagreement over the effectiveness of neutral versus partisan intervention. This article examines the conditions under which mediators construct a consensus on the type of intervention process. What are the factors that enable a consensus on a neutral versus a partisan intervention? Distinguishing between four types of international intervention processes – united-neutral, united-partisan, divided-partisan, and divided neutral and partisan intervention – this article argues that it is a united intervention, whether united partisan or united-neutral, that contributes to creating leverage on conflicting parties to end a conflict. The article examines consensus building among mediators within two divergent case studies: Northern Ireland and Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Mediating among Mediators: Building a Consensus in Multilateral Interventions

in International Negotiation

Sections

References

AdamsGerry (2003). Hope and History: Making Peace in Ireland. Wellesley MA: Brandon.

AnnanKofi (1999). “Secretary-General reflects on promise, realities of his role in world affairs, in address to Council on Foreign Relations.” Press Release sg/sm/6865 January 19 1999.

ArthurPaul (1999). “Multiparty Mediation in Northern Ireland,” in Chester A. CrockerFen Osler HampsonPamela Aall editors Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace.

AydinAysegul and Patrick M. Regan (2011). “Networks of third-party interveners and civil war duration.” European Journal of International Relations: 125.

BegganDominic and Rathnam Indurthy (1999). “The Conflict in Northern Ireland and the Clinton Administration Role.” International Journal of World Peace 164: 325.

BellamyAlex J. (2010). “The Responsibility to Protect – Five Years On.” Ethics and International Affairs 242: 143169.

Ben-PoratGuy (2008). The Failure of the Middle East Peace Process? Jerusalem: Van Leer Jerusalem Institute.

BildtCarl (1999). Peace Journey: The Struggle for Peace in Bosnia. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

BohmeltTobias (2011). “Disaggregating Mediations: The Impact of Multiparty Mediation.” British Journal of Political Science 414: 859881.

CampbellDavid (1998). National Deconstruction: Violence Identity and Justice in Bosnia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

CashDaniel John (1996). Identity Ideology and Conflict the Structuration of Politics in Northern Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

CholletDerek and Bennett Freeman (2005). “The Secret History of Dayton, US Diplomacy and the Bosnia Peace Process 1995.” Washington, D.C.: National Security Archive. Available at: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB171/index.htm%3E.

CrockerChester A.Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela Aall editors (1999). Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.

DixonPaul (2001). “British Policy towards Northern Ireland, 1969–2000: Continuity tactical adjustment and coesistnace.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 33: 340368.

dsd (1993). The Joint Declaration of 15 December 1993.

FisherRogerAndrea Kupfer SchneiderElizabeth Borqwardt and Brian Ganson editors (1996). Coping with International Conflict: A Systematic Approach to Influence in International Negotiation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

FindleyMichael G. and Josiah F. Marineau (2015). “Lootable resources and third-party intervention into civil wars.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 325: 465486.

GibbsDavid N. (2009). First Do No Harm: Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

GroveAndrea (2001). “The Intra-National Struggle to Define ‘Us’: External Involvement as a Two-Way Street.” International Studies Quaterly 45: 357388.

GuelkeAdrian (2012). “Perspective,” BBC Eye Witness Perspective. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/northernireland/learning/eyewitness/changing/perspectives/index.shtml.

Hafner-BurtonEmilie M. (2014). “A Social Science of Human Rights.” Journal of Peace Research 512: 273286.

HehirAidan (2010). “The Responsibility to Protect: ‘Sound and Fury Signifying Nothing?’ ” International Relations 242: 218239.

HehirAidan and James Pattison (2015). “Introduction: The Responsibility to Protect after the Arab Spring.” Cooperation and Conflict: 17.

Helsinki Watch (1993). War Crimes in Bosnia.

HillTom H. J. (2015). “Kofi Annan’s Multilateral Strategy of Mediation and the Syrian Crisis: The Future of Peacemaking in a Multipolar World.” International Negotiation 20: 444478.

HoddieMatthew and Caroline Hartzell (2003). “Civil War Settlements and the Implementation of Military Power-Sharing Arrangements.” Journal of Peace Research 403: 303320

LynchAllen C. (2001). “The Realism of Russia’s Foreign Policy.” Europe-Asia Studies 531: 731.

JesseNeal G. and Kristen P. Williams (2006). Identity and Institutions: Conflict Resolution in Divided Societies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

JohnsonRebecca J. (2001). “Russian Responses to Crisis Management in the Balkans, How NATO’s Past Actions May Shape Russia’s Future Involvement.” Demokratizatsiya.

KathmanJacob D. and Reed M. Wood (2011). “Managing Threat, Cost, and Incentive to Kill: The Short-and Long-Term Effects of Intervention in Mass Killings.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 555: 735760.

KyddAndrew (2003). “Which Side Are You On? Bias, Credibility and Mediation.” American Journal of Political Science 474: 597611.

KrainMatthew (2005). “International Intervention and the Severity of Genocides and Policides.” International Studies Quaterly 49: 363387.

KrainMatthew (2012). “J’accuse! Does naming and shaming perpetrators reduce the severity of genocides or politicides?” International Studies Quaterly 563: 574589.

LakeAnthony (2006). “Between War and Peace, How to Manage Threats to Global Security.” Harvard International Review 25Winter: 177196.

LischerSarah Kenyon (2007). “Military Intervention and the Humanitarian ‘Force Multiplier.’ ” Global Governance 13: 99118.

LundgrenMagnus and Isak Svensson (2014). “Leanings and Dealings: Exploring Bias and Trade Leverage in Civil War Mediation by International Organizations.” International Negotiation 19: 315342.

McGarryJohn (2001). “Northern Ireland, Civic Nationalism and the Good Friday Agreement,” in John McGarry editor Northern Ireland and the Divided World Post Agreement Northern Ireland in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McGarryJohn and Brendan O’Leary (2015). “Power Sharing Executives Consociational and Centripetal Formulae and the Case of Northern Ireland.” Ethnopolitics 155.

MenningaElizabeth (2015). Multiparty Mediation: Identifying Characteristics of the Mediation Dream TeamPhD Dissertation.

MitchellGeorge (2001). Making Peace. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.

MorrisJustin (2016). “The Responsibility to Protect and the use of force: Remaking the Procrustean bed?” Cooperation and Conflict 512: 141147.

MurdieAmanda and Dursun Peksen (2014). “The Impact of Human Rights INGO Shaming on Humanitarian Interventions.” Journal of Politics 761: 215228.

NalbandovRobert (2009). Foreign Interventions in Ethnic Conflicts: Global Security in a Changing World. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

OwenDavid (1997). Balkan Odyssey. New York: Mariner Books.

Ronald Paris (2014). “ ‘The Responsibility to Protect’ and the Sturctural Problems of Preventive Humanitarian Intervention.” International Peacekeeping 215: 569603.

PattisonJames (2015). “The Ethics of Diplomatic Criticism: The Responsibility to Protect, Just War Theory and Presumptive Last Resort.” European Journal of International Relations 214: 935957.

PeksenDursun (2011). “Foreign Military Intervention and Women’s Rights.” Journal of Peace Research 484: 455468.

ReganPatrick M. (1996). “Conditions of Successful Third-Party Intervention in Interstate Conflicts. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 402: 336359.

ReganPatrick M. (2002). Civil Wars and Foreign Powers; Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

ReganPatrick and Aysegul Aydin (2006). “Diplomacy and Other Forms of Intervention in Civil Wars.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 505: 736756.

ReganPatrick and Rodwan Abouharb (2002). “Interventions and Civil Conflicts.” World Affairs 1651.

RyanStephen (1995). Ethnic Conflict and International Relations. London: Dartmouth Publishing Group.

SavunBurcu (2008). “Information, Bias and Mediation Success.” International Studies Quaterly 52: 2547.

SchwegmannChristoph (2000). “The Contact Group and its Impact on the European Institutional Structure.” Institute for Security Studies – Western European Union.

SeawrightJason and John Gerring (2008). “Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research.” Political Research Quaterly 612: 294308.

SpitkaTimea (2015). International Intervention Identity and Conflict Transformation: Bridges and Walls Between Groups. Abingdon: Routledge.

StuenkelOliver (2014). “The Bricks and the Future of R2P.” Global Resposnsibility to Protect328.

SvenssonIsak (2007). “Bargaining, Bias and Peace Brokers: How Rebels Commit to Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 442: 177194.

SvenssonIsak (2009). “Who Brings Which Peace? Neutral versus Biased Mediation and Institutional Peace Arrangements in Civil Wars.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 533: 446469.

SvenssonIsak (2015). International Mediation Bias and Peacemaking: Taking Sides in Civil Wars. Abingdon: Routledge.

TocciNathalie (2016). “On Power and Norms: Syria and the Responsibility to Protect.” Global Responsibility to Protect 81: 5175.

TuckChristopher (2007). “Northern Ireland and the British Approach to counter Insurgency.” Defense and Security Analysis 23 (2): 165183.

unsc (1994). Special Forces: Final Report of the United Nations Commission of Experts. United Nations Security Council S/1994/647/Add2.

WallensteenPeter and Isak Svensson (2014). “Talking Peace International Mediation in Armed Conflict.” Journal of Peace Research52: 315327.

WeissThomas G. (2004). “The Sunset of Humanitarian Intervention?” Security Dialogue 322: 135153.

WoodReed M. and Jacob D. Kathman (2012). “Armed Intervention and Civilian Victimization in Intrastate Conflicts.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 495: 647660.

YoshiharaSusan (2010). Waging War to Make Peace: US Intervention in Global Conflicts. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

ZartmanI. William and Saadia Touval (1996). “International Mediation in the Post-Cold War Era,” in Chester A CrockerFen Hampson and Pamela Aall editors Managing Global Chaos. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press 1996445461.

Figures

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 50 50 24
Full Text Views 94 94 59
PDF Downloads 9 9 6
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0