The EU as a Multi-Mediator: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

In the 1990s, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) experienced complex wars involving local, national and regional combatants and conflict drivers, which formally ended in 2002. Violence continued and the government and rebel groups negotiated a series of peace deals, most recently in 2013. The European Union (EU) has been engaged in the DRC since the 1990s. This article proposes a model for conceptualizing EU mediation engagement within the conflict and process contexts, and the necessary capabilities for different types of EU mediation. It uses the DRC case study to examine how different EU capabilities were engaged in various peace processes which addressed multiple layers of a complex situation, and also engaged with other external actors in a multilateral environment. It concludes that the EU can be conceptualized as a multi-mediator and identifies the necessary capabilities for this.

The EU as a Multi-Mediator: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo

in International Negotiation

Sections

References

AroussiS. and S. Vandeginste (2013). “When Interests Meet Norms: The Relevance of Human Rights for Peace and Power-Sharing.” The International Journal of Human Rights 172: 183203.

AutesserreSéverine (2007). “D. R. Congo: Explaining Peace Building Failures 2003–2006.” Review of African Political Economy 34113: 423441.

BeardsleyKyle (2013). “Using the Right Tool for the Job: Mediator Leverage and Conflict Resolution.” Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 21: 5765.

BeardsleyK.D. QuinnB. Biswas and J. Wilkenfeld (2006). “Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 501: 5886.

BellChristine (2008). On the Law of Peace Peace Agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BercovitchJacob (2007). “Mediation in International Conflicts,” in I. William Zartman editor Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace Press.

BercovitchJ.J. T. Anagnoson and D. L. Wille (1991). “Some Conceptual Issues and Empirical Trends in the Study of Successful Mediation in International Relations.” Journal of Peace Research 281: 717.

BercovitchJ. and A. Houston (1996). “The Study of International Mediation: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence,” in Jacob Bercovitch editor Resolving International Conflicts. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

BergmannJ. and A. Niemann (2015). “Mediating International Conflicts: the European Union as an Effective Peacemaker?” Journal of Common Market Studies 535: 957975.

Council of the EU (2009). Concept on Strengthening EU Mediation and Dialogue Capacities 17779/09. Brussels: Council of the EU.

Council of the EU (2015). Council Conclusions on EU’s Support to Transitional Justice 13576/15. Brussels: Council of the EU.

Council of the European Union (2016). Council Conclusions on Implementing the EU Global Strategy in the Area of Security and Defence November 14. Brussels: Council of the European Union.

DavisLaura (2013). “Power Shared and Justice Shelved: The Democratic Republic of Congo.” The International Journal of Human Rights 172: 289306.

DavisLaura (2014). EU Foreign Policy Transitional Justice and Mediation: Principle Policy and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.

Davis Laura (2015). “Make Do, or Mend? EU Security Provision in Complex Conflicts: The Democratic Republic of Congo.” European Security 41:101119.

DavisL.N. Habbida and A. Penfrat (2017). “The EU’s Capabilities for Conflict Prevention, EU-CIVCAP Report DL 3.2.” Bristol: EU-CIVCAP. At: https://eucivcap.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/eus_capabilities_conflict_prevention.pdf.

EuropeAid (2007). EIDHR European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights 2000–2006. Brussels: EuropeAid.

European Commission (2009). Annual Report from the European Commission on the Instrument for Stability in 2008 COM(2009) 341. Brussels: European Commission.

European Commission and High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2013). “Joint Communication to the Council A Strategic Framework for the Great Lakes Region Brussels 19 June 2013 JOIN(2013) 23 final.” Brussels: European Commission.

European External Action Service (2014). Factsheet: EU Mediation Support Team February 2014. At: http://eeas.europa.eu/factsheets/docs/factsheet_eu-mediation-support-team_en.pdf.

FisherR. and L. Keashley (1991). “The Potential Complementarity of Mediation and Consultation within a Contingency Model of Third Party Intervention.” Journal of Peace Research 281: 2942.

Fisher OnarN. and K. Nicolaïdis (2013). “The Decentring Agenda: Europe as a Post-Colonial Power.” Cooperation and Conflict 482: 283303.

FolgerJ. and R. Baruch Bush (1996). “Transformative Mediation and Third-Party Intervention: Ten Hallmarks of a Transformative Approach to Practice.” Mediation Quarterly 134: 263278.

HeemsbergenL. and A. Siniver (2011). “New Routes to Power: Towards a Typology of Power Mediation.” Review of International Studies 373: 11691190.

KalyvasStathis (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

KirchhoffLars (2008). Constructive Interventions: Paradigms Process and Practice of International Mediation. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

KleiboerMarieke (1998). Multiple Realities of International Mediation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

KleiboerMarieke (1994). “Ripeness of Conflict: a Fruitful Notion?” Journal of Peace Research 311: 109116.

LanzD.M. WählischL. Kirchhoff and M. Siegfried (2008). Evaluating Peace Mediation. Brussels: Initiative for Peacebuilding.

Peen RodtA.R. G. Whitman and S. Wolff editors (2016). Theorizing the European Union as an International Security Provider. Abingdon: Routledge.

PrunierGérard (2009). From Genocide to Continental War: The ‘Congolese’ Conflict and the Crisis of Contemporary Africa. London: Hurst

RamcharanBertrand (2007). “Human Rights and Conflict Resolution,” in C. H. Grant and R. M. Kirton editors Governance Conflict Analysis and Conflict Resolution. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers.

RauchhausRobert (2006). “Asymmetric Information, Mediation and Conflict Management.” World Politics 582: 207241.

République démocratique du Congo – Communauté européenne (2007). Document de Stratégie Pays et Programme Indicative National 10e FED 2008–2013. Brussels: European Commission.

République démocratique du Congo – Communauté européenne (2007). Stratégie de Cooperation et Programme Indicatif 2003–2007. Brussels: European Commission.

RFI (2014). “RDC: Une loi d’amnistie pour faits de guerre et infractions politiques.” RFI Afrique. April 20. At: http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20140204-rdc-adoption-loi-amnistie-faits-guerre-infractions-politiques-m23-kabila.

TouvalS. and I. W. Zartman (1985). “Introduction: Mediation in Theory,” in S. Touval and I. W. Zartman editors International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

United Nations Development Programme (2016). International Human Development Indicators. UNDP: New York. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries.

VlassenrootK. and T. Raeymaekers (2003). “Le Conflit en Ituri” in S. Marysse and F. Reintjens editors L’Afrique des Grands Lacs: Annuaire 2002–2003. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Whitman R. and S. Wolff editors (2012). The European Union as a Global Conflict Manager. Abingdon: Routledge.

WilkenfeldJ.K. YoungV. Asal and D. Quinn (2003). “Mediating International Crises: Cross-National and Experimental Perspectives.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 473: 279301.

ZartmanI. W. and S. Touval (2007). “International Mediation,” in C. A. CrockerF. Olser Hampson and P. Aall editors Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace Press.

Figures

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 41 41 15
Full Text Views 15 15 15
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0