The EU as a Multi-Mediator: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo
In: International NegotiationSearch for other papers by Laura Davis in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In the 1990s, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) experienced complex wars involving local, national and regional combatants and conflict drivers, which formally ended in 2002. Violence continued and the government and rebel groups negotiated a series of peace deals, most recently in 2013. The European Union (EU) has been engaged in the DRC since the 1990s. This article proposes a model for conceptualizing EU mediation engagement within the conflict and process contexts, and the necessary capabilities for different types of EU mediation. It uses the DRC case study to examine how different EU capabilities were engaged in various peace processes which addressed multiple layers of a complex situation, and also engaged with other external actors in a multilateral environment. It concludes that the EU can be conceptualized as a multi-mediator and identifies the necessary capabilities for this.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aroussi, S. and S. Vandeginste (2013). “When Interests Meet Norms: The Relevance of Human Rights for Peace and Power-Sharing.” The International Journal of Human Rights 17, 2: 183–203.
-
Autesserre, Séverine (2007). “D. R. Congo: Explaining Peace Building Failures 2003–2006.” Review of African Political Economy 34, 113: 423–441.
-
Beardsley, Kyle (2013). “Using the Right Tool for the Job: Mediator Leverage and Conflict Resolution.” Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 2, 1: 57–65.
-
Beardsley, K., D. Quinn, B. Biswas and J. Wilkenfeld (2006). “Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, 1: 58–86.
-
Bell, Christine (2008). On the Law of Peace, Peace Agreements and the Lex Pacificatoria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Bercovitch, Jacob (2007). “Mediation in International Conflicts,” in I. William Zartman, editor, Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace Press.
-
Bercovitch, J., J. T. Anagnoson and D. L. Wille (1991). “Some Conceptual Issues and Empirical Trends in the Study of Successful Mediation in International Relations.” Journal of Peace Research 28, 1: 7–17.
-
Bercovitch, J. and A. Houston (1996). “The Study of International Mediation: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence,” in Jacob Bercovitch, editor, Resolving International Conflicts. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
-
Bergmann, J. and A. Niemann (2015). “Mediating International Conflicts: the European Union as an Effective Peacemaker?” Journal of Common Market Studies 53, 5: 957–975.
-
Council of the EU (2009). Concept on Strengthening EU Mediation and Dialogue Capacities 17779/09. Brussels: Council of the EU.
-
Council of the EU (2015). Council Conclusions on EU’s Support to Transitional Justice 13576/15. Brussels: Council of the EU.
-
Council of the European Union (2016). Council Conclusions on Implementing the EU Global Strategy in the Area of Security and Defence November 14. Brussels: Council of the European Union.
-
Davis, Laura (2013). “Power Shared and Justice Shelved: The Democratic Republic of Congo.” The International Journal of Human Rights 17, 2: 289–306.
-
Davis, Laura (2014). EU Foreign Policy, Transitional Justice and Mediation: Principle, Policy and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Davis Laura (2015). “Make Do, or Mend? EU Security Provision in Complex Conflicts: The Democratic Republic of Congo.” European Security 4, 1:101–119.
-
Davis, L., N. Habbida and A. Penfrat (2017). “The EU’s Capabilities for Conflict Prevention, EU-CIVCAP Report DL 3.2.” Bristol: EU-CIVCAP. At: https://eucivcap.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/eus_capabilities_conflict_prevention.pdf.
-
EuropeAid (2007). EIDHR European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights 2000–2006. Brussels: EuropeAid.
-
European Commission (2009). Annual Report from the European Commission on the Instrument for Stability in 2008 COM(2009) 341. Brussels: European Commission.
-
European Commission and High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (2013). “Joint Communication to the Council A Strategic Framework for the Great Lakes Region, Brussels, 19 June 2013 JOIN(2013) 23 final.” Brussels: European Commission.
-
European External Action Service (2014). Factsheet: EU Mediation Support Team February 2014. At: http://eeas.europa.eu/factsheets/docs/factsheet_eu-mediation-support-team_en.pdf.
-
Fisher, R. and L. Keashley (1991). “The Potential Complementarity of Mediation and Consultation within a Contingency Model of Third Party Intervention.” Journal of Peace Research 28, 1: 29–42.
-
Fisher Onar, N. and K. Nicolaïdis (2013). “The Decentring Agenda: Europe as a Post-Colonial Power.” Cooperation and Conflict 48, 2: 283–303.
-
Folger, J. and R. Baruch Bush (1996). “Transformative Mediation and Third-Party Intervention: Ten Hallmarks of a Transformative Approach to Practice.” Mediation Quarterly 13, 4: 263–278.
-
Heemsbergen, L. and A. Siniver (2011). “New Routes to Power: Towards a Typology of Power Mediation.” Review of International Studies 37, 3: 1169–1190.
-
Kalyvas, Stathis (2006). The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kirchhoff, Lars (2008). Constructive Interventions: Paradigms, Process and Practice of International Mediation. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
-
Kleiboer, Marieke (1998). Multiple Realities of International Mediation. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
-
Kleiboer, Marieke (1994). “Ripeness of Conflict: a Fruitful Notion?” Journal of Peace Research 31, 1: 109–116.
-
Lanz, D., M. Wählisch, L. Kirchhoff and M. Siegfried (2008). Evaluating Peace Mediation. Brussels: Initiative for Peacebuilding.
-
Peen Rodt, A., R. G. Whitman and S. Wolff, editors (2016). Theorizing the European Union as an International Security Provider. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Prunier, Gérard (2009). From Genocide to Continental War: The ‘Congolese’ Conflict and the Crisis of Contemporary Africa. London: Hurst
-
Ramcharan, Bertrand (2007). “Human Rights and Conflict Resolution,” in C. H. Grant and R. M. Kirton, editors, Governance Conflict Analysis and Conflict Resolution. Kingston: Ian Randle Publishers.
-
Rauchhaus, Robert (2006). “Asymmetric Information, Mediation and Conflict Management.” World Politics 58, 2: 207–241.
-
République démocratique du Congo – Communauté européenne (2007). Document de Stratégie Pays et Programme Indicative National 10e FED 2008–2013. Brussels: European Commission.
-
République démocratique du Congo – Communauté européenne (2007). Stratégie de Cooperation et Programme Indicatif 2003–2007. Brussels: European Commission.
-
RFI (2014). “RDC: Une loi d’amnistie pour faits de guerre et infractions politiques.” RFI Afrique. April 20. At: http://www.rfi.fr/afrique/20140204-rdc-adoption-loi-amnistie-faits-guerre-infractions-politiques-m23-kabila.
-
Touval, S. and I. W. Zartman (1985). “Introduction: Mediation in Theory,” in S. Touval and I. W. Zartman, editors, International Mediation in Theory and Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
-
United Nations Development Programme (2016). International Human Development Indicators. UNDP: New York. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/countries.
-
Vlassenroot, K. and T. Raeymaekers (2003). “Le Conflit en Ituri” in S. Marysse and F. Reintjens, editors, L’Afrique des Grands Lacs: Annuaire 2002–2003. Paris: L’Harmattan.
-
Whitman R. and S. Wolff, editors (2012). The European Union as a Global Conflict Manager. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
Wilkenfeld, J., K. Young, V. Asal and D. Quinn (2003). “Mediating International Crises: Cross-National and Experimental Perspectives.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47, 3: 279–301.
-
Zartman, I. W. and S. Touval (2007). “International Mediation,” in C. A. Crocker, F. Olser Hampson and P. Aall, editors, Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World. Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1278 | 168 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 384 | 12 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 290 | 34 | 2 |
The EU as a Multi-Mediator: The Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo
In: International NegotiationSearch for other papers by Laura Davis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In the 1990s, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) experienced complex wars involving local, national and regional combatants and conflict drivers, which formally ended in 2002. Violence continued and the government and rebel groups negotiated a series of peace deals, most recently in 2013. The European Union (EU) has been engaged in the DRC since the 1990s. This article proposes a model for conceptualizing EU mediation engagement within the conflict and process contexts, and the necessary capabilities for different types of EU mediation. It uses the DRC case study to examine how different EU capabilities were engaged in various peace processes which addressed multiple layers of a complex situation, and also engaged with other external actors in a multilateral environment. It concludes that the EU can be conceptualized as a multi-mediator and identifies the necessary capabilities for this.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1278 | 168 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 384 | 12 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 290 | 34 | 2 |
