In October 2009, the European Union, in conjunction with the United States, launched a high-level mediation effort in Butmir, Bosnia and Herzegovina, to reform the political structure of the state. Since 2005, the constitution which was included in the Dayton Peace Accord has been widely perceived as dysfunctional. In two negotiation rounds, the EU and the US put a comprehensive proposal on the table and showed strong leverage. However, the talks ended without a tangible result. To explain this failure, a theoretical model is developed based on both mediation and Europeanization literature to explore mediation by conditionality as a type of ‘directive mediation’ in a systematic way. Contrary to the argument that the EU lacked muscle, it is argued that pre-conditions for political conditionality were not fulfilled and strong leverage proved ineffective and counterproductive. These results question conditionality as an effective mediation strategy when state-building is contested between local parties.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Beardsley, Kyle C., David M. Quinn, Bidisha Biswas and Jonathan Wilkenfeld (2006). “Mediation Style and Crisis Outcomes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50, 1: 58–86.
Bercovitch, Jacob (1997). “Mediation in International Conflict: An Overview of Theory, A Review of Practice,” in I. William Zartman and J. Lewis Rasmussen, editors, Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Bergmann, Julian and Arne Niemann (2015). “Mediating International Conflicts: The European Union as an Effective Peacemaker?” Journal of Common Market Studies 53, 5: 957–975.
Bieber, Florian (2010). Constitutional Reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: preparing for EU accession. European Policy Centre, Policy Brief (2010): Brussels. At: http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/1087_constitutional_reform_in_bosnia_and_herzegovina.pdf.
Biermann, Rafael (2014). “Coercive Europeanization: the EU’s struggle to contain secessionism in the Balkans.” European Security 23, 4: 484–508.
Chandler, David (1999). Bosnia: Faking Democracy after Dayton. London: Pluto Press.
Cooley, Laurence (2013). “The European Union’s approach to conflict resolution: Insights from the constitutional reform process in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Comparative European Politics 11, 172–200.
Crocker, Chester A., Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela Aall (2009). “Why Mediation Matters: Ending Intractable Conflicts,” in Jacob Bercovitch, Victor Kremenyuk and I. William Zartman, editors, The Sage Handbook of Conflict Resolution. London: SAGE Publications.
Crocker, Chester A., Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela Aall (2015). “The Shifting Sands of Peacemaking: Challenges of Multiparty Mediation.” International Negotiation, 20, 363–388.
da Conceição-Heldt, Eugénia and Sophie Meunier (2015). “Speaking with a single voice: internal cohesiveness and external effectiveness of the EU in global governance.” Journal of European Public Policy 21, 7: 961–979.
Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) (1995). “The General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” At: http://www.ohr.int/dpa/default.asp?content_id=379.
Delegation of the EU in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2009). “2009 Progress Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina Presented.” At: http://europa.ba/?p=34083.
Druckman, Daniel and Christopher Mitchell, editors (1995). “Flexibility in International Negotiation and Mediation.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542 (November).
Džihić, Vedra and Angela Wieser (2011). “Incentives for Democratisation? Effects of EU Conditionality on Democracy in Bosnia & Hercegovina.” Europe-Asia Studies 63, 10: 1803–1825.
Elgström, Ole and Michael Smith (2015). “Introduction,” in Ole Elgström and Michael Smith, editors, The European Union’s Roles in International Politics. Concepts and Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Ethier, Diane (2003). “Is Democracy Promotion Effective? Comparing Conditionality and Incentives.” Democratization 10, 1: 99–120.
European Commission (2010). “Bosnia and Herzegovina Progress Report 2010.” At: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/key_documents/2010/package/ba_rapport_2010_en.pdf.
European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) (2005). “Opinion on the Constitutional Situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Powers of the High Representative.” At: http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD%282005%29004-e.
European Court of Human Rights (2009). “Sedic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Reports of Judgments and Decisions. At: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96491#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-96491%22]}.
Fixdal, Mona (2015). “The Minefields of Mediation: An Overview.” International Negotiation 20, 353–362.
Freyburg, Tina and Solveig Richter (2010). “National Identity Matters! The Limited Impact of EU Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans.” Journal of European Public Policy 17, 2: 263–281.
Gromes, Thorsten (2009). “A Case Study in ‘Institutionalisation before Liberalisation’, Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 3, 1: 93–114.
Grabbe, Heather (2006). The EU’s Transformative Power. Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hill, Christopher (1993). “The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31, 3: 305–328.
International Crisis Group (ICG) (2009). “Bosnia’s Dual’ Crisis,” Crisis Group Europe Briefing 57. At: http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/europe/B57%20Bosnias%20Dual%20Crisis.pdf.
Juncos, Ana E. (2011). “Europeanization by Decree? The Case of Police Reform in Bosnia.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49, 2: 367–389.
Juncos, Ana E. (2013). EUForeign and Security Policy in Bosnia: The Politics of Coherence and Effectiveness. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Latal, Srecko (2015). “Bosnia Restless, 20 Years After Dayton.” Balkan Transitional Justice, 19/11/2015.
Lavenex, Sandra and Frank Schimmelfennig (2011). “EU Democracy Promotion in the Neighbourhood: From Leverage to Governance?” Democratization 18, 4: 885–909.
Noutcheva, Gergana (2009). “Fake, Partial and Imposed Compliance: The Limits of the EU’s Normative Power in the Western Balkans.” Journal of European Public Policy 16, 7: 1065–1084.
Office of the High Representative (OHR) (2017). “The Mandate of the OHR.” At: http://www.ohr.int/ohr-info/gen-info/default.asp?content_id=38612.
Paris, Roland (2004). At Wars End. Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rehn, Olli (2009). “Sovereign and functional Bosnia and Herzegovina – a precondition for obtaining candidate status for the EU membership,” Press Release, EU Delegation to Bosnia and Herzegovina and EU Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina, October 8. At: http://europa.ba/?p=34069&media.
Richmond, Oliver (1998). “Devious Objectives and the Disputants’ View of International Mediation: A Theoretical Framework.” Journal of Peace Research 35, 6: 707–722.
Richter, Solveig (2012). “Two at one blow? The EU and its quest for security and democracy by political conditionality in the Western Balkans.” Democratization 19, 3: 507–534.
Rodt, Annemarie Peen, Richard G. Whitman and Stefan Wolff (2015). “The EU as an International Security Provider: The Need for a Mid-range Theory.” Global Society 29, 2: 149–155.
Schimmelfennig, Frank (2008). “EU Political Conditionality after the 2004 Enlargement: Consistency and Effectiveness.” Journal of European Public Policy 15, 6: 918–937.
Schimmelfennig, Frank and Ulrich Sedelmeier (2005). “Introduction: Conceptualizing the Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe,” in Frank Schimmelfennig and Ulrich Sedelmeier, editors, The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Svensson, Isak (2007). “Mediation with Muscles or Minds? Exploring Power Mediators and Pure Mediators in Civil Wars.” International Negotiation 12, 229–248.
The New York Times (1991). “Conflict in Yugoslavia: Europeans send High-Level-Team,” June 29. At: http://www.nytimes.com/1991/06/29/world/conflict-in-yugoslavia-europeans-send-high-level-team.html.
Tolksdorf, Dominik (2015). “The European Union as a Mediator in Constitutional Reform Negotiations in Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Failure of Conditionality in the Context of Intransigent Local Politics.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 21, 4: 401–421.
Touval, Saadia (2003). “Mediation and Foreign Policy.” International Studies Review 5, 4: 91–95.
Zartman, I. William and Saadia Touval (2007). “International Mediation,” in Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela Aall, editors, Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Zartman, I. William and Alvaro de Soto (2010). Timing Mediation Initiatives. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Zdeb, Aleksandra (2017). “Prud and Butmir Processes in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Intra- ethnic Competition from the Perspective of Game Theory.” Ethnopolitics, 16, 4: 369–387.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1794 | 203 | 37 |
Full Text Views | 285 | 8 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 255 | 18 | 4 |
In October 2009, the European Union, in conjunction with the United States, launched a high-level mediation effort in Butmir, Bosnia and Herzegovina, to reform the political structure of the state. Since 2005, the constitution which was included in the Dayton Peace Accord has been widely perceived as dysfunctional. In two negotiation rounds, the EU and the US put a comprehensive proposal on the table and showed strong leverage. However, the talks ended without a tangible result. To explain this failure, a theoretical model is developed based on both mediation and Europeanization literature to explore mediation by conditionality as a type of ‘directive mediation’ in a systematic way. Contrary to the argument that the EU lacked muscle, it is argued that pre-conditions for political conditionality were not fulfilled and strong leverage proved ineffective and counterproductive. These results question conditionality as an effective mediation strategy when state-building is contested between local parties.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1794 | 203 | 37 |
Full Text Views | 285 | 8 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 255 | 18 | 4 |