Domestic Political Incentives, Congressional Support, and U.S. Mediation

in International Negotiation
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Powerful states have numerous resources that can be mobilized in mediation processes. However, evidence suggests that such states are not more likely to be successful than other mediators. This article examines U.S. mediations through the lens of foreign policy decision making and argues that leaders make foreign policy decisions primarily with their domestic consequences in mind. Further, it contends that presidential administrations seek to build a record of success in order to improve their domestic political fortunes based on the policy options available to them. The study tests two explanations of foreign policy substitution based on domestic conditions and institutional configurations, the “party cover” and “policy availability” arguments, for U.S. mediations from 1945–1999. Results for the party cover argument are more robust, suggesting that domestic conditions play an important role in the decision to engage in mediation and imply that successful mediation is secondary to domestic politics.

Domestic Political Incentives, Congressional Support, and U.S. Mediation

in International Negotiation



AmooSamuel G. and I. William Zartman (1992). “Mediation by Regional Organizations: The Organization of African Unity (OAU) in Chad,” in Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin editors Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. London: Macmillan.

AndersonChristopher J. (1995). “The Dynamics of Public Support for Coalition Governments.” Comparative Political Studies 283: 350383.

AndersonPelleJustin BaumgartnerJ. Michael Greig and Paul Diehl (2001). “Turning Down the Heat: Influences on Conflict Management in Enduring Rivalries.” International Interactions 27: 239274.

BartoliAndrea (2005). “Learning form the Mozambique Peace Process: The Role of the Community of Sant’Egidio,” in Ronald Fisher editor Paving the Way: Contributions of Interactive Conflict Resolution to Peacemaking. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

BercovitchJacob (1999). “International Conflict Management Database.” Christchurch, New Zealand. Data and Coding Manual.

BercovitchJacob and Gerald Schneider (2000). “Who Mediates? The Political Economy of International Conflict Management.” Journal of Peace Research 372: 145165.

BondJon R. and Richard Fleisher (1990). The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

BradyDavidJoseph Cooper and Patricia Hurley (1977). “The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1969.” Sage Yearbook on Electoral StudiesBeverly Hills: Sage Publications.

BramborThomasWilliam Roberts Clark and Matt Golder (2006). “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses.” Political Analysis 13: 120.

BruléDavid J. (2006). “Congressional Opposition, the Economy, and U.S. Dispute Initiation, 1946–2000.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 50: 463483.

ClarkD. H. (2000). “Agreeing to disagree: Domestic institutional congruence, and U.S. dispute behavior.” Political Research Quarterly 532: 375401.

DixonWilliam (1996). “Third-party Techniques for Preventing Conflict Escalation and Promoting Peaceful Settlement.” International Organization 50: 653681.

FiorinaMorris P. (1992). Divided Government. New York: Macmillan.

FleisherRichard and Jon R. Bond (2000). “Partisanship and the President’s Quest for Votes on the Floor of Congress,” in Jon R. Bond and Richard Fleisher editors Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

FordPeter (2000). “Norway as a Peacemaker.” Christian Science Monitor (May 31) Washington, DC. Available at:; accessed on December 20 2016.

FordhamBenjamin (1998). “The Politics of Threat Perception and the Use of Force: A Political Economy Model of U.S. Uses of Force, 1949–1994.” International Studies Quarterly 42: 567590.

FordhamBenjamin O. and Christopher C. Sarver (2001). “Militarized Interstate Disputes and United States Uses of Force.” International Studies Quarterly 452: 455466.

FosterDennis (2006). “An ‘Invitation to Struggle?’ The Use of Force against ‘Legislatively Vulnerable’ American Presidents.” International Studies Quarterly 502421444.

FosterDennis M. and Glenn Palmer (2006). “Presidents, Public Opinion, and Diversionary Behavior: The Role of Partisan Support Reconsidered.” Foreign Policy Analysis 2: 269287.

GaubatzKurt Taylor (1991). “Election Cycles and War.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 352: 212244.

GilpinRobert (1981). War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

GreigJ. Michael (2001). “Moments of Opportunity: Sources of Ripeness among Enduring Rivals.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45: 691718.

GreigJ. Michael (2005). “Stepping into the Fray: When Do Mediators Mediate?” American Journal of Political Science 49: 249266.

GreigJ. Michael and Paul Diehl (2006). “Softening Up: Making Conflicts More Amenable to Diplomacy.” International Interactions 32: 355384.

GreigJ. Michael and Patrick M. Regan (2008). “When Do They Say Yes? An Analysis of the Willingness to Offer and Accept Mediation in Civil Wars.” International Studies Quarterly 52: 759781.

GronkePaul and Brian Newman (2003). “FDR to Clinton, Mueller to?: A Field Essay on Presidential Approval.” Political Research Quarterly 564: 510512.

HinckleyBarbara (1994). Less than Meets the Eye: Foreign Policy Making and the Myth of an Assertive Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

HowellW. (2003). Power without Persuasion: The Politics of Direct Presidential Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

HowellW. (2005). “Unilateral Powers: A Brief Overview.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 353: 417439.

HowellW. and J. Pevehouse (2007). While Dangers Gather: Congressional Checks on Presidential War Powers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

HowellWillam and Jon Pevehouse (2005). “Presidents, Congress, and the Use of Force.” International Organization 59: 209232.

JohnsonLoch and James M. McCormick (1977). “Foreign Policy by Executive Fiat.” Foreign Policy 28: 117138.

JonesDanielStuart Bremer and J. David Singer (1996). “Militarized Interstate Disputes: 1816–1992 Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 152: 163213.

KamCindy D. and Robert J. Franzese (2005). Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis: A Refresher and Some Practical Advice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

KleiboerMareike (2002). “Great Power Mediation: Using Leverage to Make Peace,” In Jacob Bercovitch editor Studies in International Mediation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

LongJ. Scott (1997). Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

MarshallBryan and Brandon C. Prins (2011). “Power or Posturing? Congressional Influence on U.S. Presidential Decisions to Use Force.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 413: 521545special issue.

MayerKenneth (2001). With the Stroke of a Pen: Executive Orders and Presidential Power. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

MeernikJames (1994). “Presidential Decision Making and the Political Use of Military Force.” International Studies Quarterly 38: 121138.

MoolakkattuJoseph S. (2005). “Peace Facilitation by Small States: Norway in Sri Lanka.” Cooperation and Conflict 404: 385402.

MuellerJohn (1973). War Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.

NeustadtRichard E. 1960. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership. New York: Wiley.

OrganskiA.F.K. and Jacek Kugler (1980). The War Ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

OstromCharles and Brian Job (1986). “The President and the Political Use of Force.” American Political Science Review 80: 541566.

PruittDean G. (1981). “Kissinger as a Traditional Mediator with Power,” in Jeffrey Z. Rubin editor Dynamics of Third Party Intervention. New York: Praeger136147.

RagsdaleLyn (1998). Vital Statistics on the Presidency. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

RichardsDianaT. Clifton MorganRick K. WilsonValerie Schwebach and Garry D. Young (1993). “Good Times, Bad Times and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Tale of Some Not So Free Agents.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37: 504535.

SchultzKenneth (2001). Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SingerJ. DavidStuart Bremer and John Stuckey (1972). “Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965,” in J. David Singer editor The Correlates of War I: Research Origins and Rationale. New York: Free Press.

SlimRanda M. (1992). “Small State Mediation in International Relations: The Algerian Mediation of the Iran Hostage Crisis,” in Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin editors Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. St. Martin’s Press: New York.

StollRichard (1984). “The Guns of November: Presidential Reelections and the Use of Force, 1947–1982.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 282: 231246.

StollRichard (1987). “The Sound of the Guns: Is There a Congressional Rally Effect after U.S. Military Action?” American Politics Quarterly 15: 223237.

TamarAhmer (2006). “Diversionary Incentives and the Bargaining Approach to War.” International Studies Quarterly 501: 169188.

TodhunterJames P. (2013). “The Domestic Fruits of Diplomacy: Mediation and Presidential Approval.” International Negotiation 182: 195217.

TouvalSaadia (1982). The Peace Brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli Conflict 1948–1979. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

TouvalSaadia (1992). “The Superpowers as Mediators,” in Jacob Bercovitch and Jeffrey Z. Rubin editors Mediation in International Relations: Multiple Approaches to Conflict Management. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

TouvalSaadia (2002). Mediation in the Yugoslav Wars: The Critical Years 1990–1995. New York: Palgrave.

TsebelisGeorge (1995). “Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism, and Multipartyism.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 289326.

WebbK. (1988). “The Morality of Mediation,” in C.R. Mitchell and K. Webb editors New Approaches to International Mediation. New York: Greenwood Press.

WooldridgeJeffrey M. (2006). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach3rd ed. Mason, OH: Thompson Southwestern.

YuenAmy and Suzanne Werner (2005). “Making and Keeping Peace.” International Organization 592: 261292.


  • View in gallery
    Effects on GDP growth on US mediations, conditioned by partisan support in Congress
  • View in gallery
    Effects on GDP growth on US mediations, conditioned by cohesive partisan support in Congress
  • View in gallery
    Effects on GDP growth on US mediations, conditioned by presidential success in Congress

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 12 12 9
Full Text Views 8 8 7
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0