Save

Incorporating Best Practices into Design and Facilitation of Track Two Initiatives

In: International Negotiation
Authors:
Tamra Pearson d’Estrée University of Denver, Josef Korbel School of International Studies 2201 S. Gaylord Street, Denver, CO 80210 USA

Search for other papers by Tamra Pearson d’Estrée in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Benjamin B. Fox University of Denver, Josef Korbel School of International Studies 2201 S. Gaylord Street, Denver, CO 80210 USA

Search for other papers by Benjamin B. Fox in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Track Two processes were developed to facilitate movement in difficult international conflicts. Since Montville first coined the term, Track Two processes have considered deliberate and strategic ways to bring together adversaries in unofficial, private face-to-face interactions that allow for joint analysis and mutual learning. Such processes create the conditions for more nuanced problem definition and solution exploration. Ideally, these insights are then transferred into official peace processes, policymaking and decision-making. Transfer acknowledges a strategic dimension to planning for change; Track Two approaches abridge and accelerate the long-term accumulation approach by the strategic choice of participants, agenda and goals. This article reviews and summarizes our knowledge to date about how best to encourage Track Two inputs into negotiation and other Track One diplomatic efforts. It then offers a checklist for designing initiatives to best promote both intergroup learning and timely transfer to generate effective change.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 705 150 13
Full Text Views 145 32 12
PDF Views & Downloads 338 77 25