Save

The Challenge of Forging Consent to UN Mediation in Internationalized Civil Wars: The Case of Syria

In: International Negotiation
View More View Less
  • 1 Graduate Institute of International and Development StudiesChemin Eugène-Rigot 2, PO Box 1672, 1211 Geneva 1Switzerland
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

This article analyzes how the internationalization of civil wars influences conflict parties’ consent to UN mediation processes. Illustrated by the UN mediation in Syria, I argue that internationalization influences consent directly by obstructing the advent of a costly stalemate and the parties’ perception of mediation as a ‘way out,’ and indirectly by reducing mediators’ leverage and perceived impartiality thereby limiting their tools to foster consent. The article makes three contributions. First, it presents a novel conceptual framework to understand the impact of internationalization on conflict parties’ consent. Second, it provides a long-term analysis of UN mediation in Syria from 2012–2020. Third, it contributes to a broader discussion about how civil wars end. This is of particular relevance as the prioritization of a political over a military end to civil wars, which was dominant in the early post-Cold War period, is no longer unquestioned.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 893 893 40
Full Text Views 55 55 4
PDF Views & Downloads 93 93 15