Dual attribution in the context of military operations

In: International Organizations Law Review
Author: Tom Dannenbaum1
View More View Less
  • 1 Lecturer in Human Rights, University College London, 29/30 Tavistock Square, London wc1h 9qu, United Kingdom,
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


This article considers the state of the doctrine on dual attribution in military operations. The rapidly expanding jurisprudence on cooperative military ventures has yet to coalesce around a single normative framework. The role of the ario and ars in that realm has been decidedly mixed, perhaps predictably given the inconsistency between the two codes. The most hopeful developments have come in the Netherlands, with the elaboration of a bifocal, preventive interpretation of Article 7 of the ario. However, whether that framework will resonate elsewhere is uncertain. Thus far, the concept of dual attribution itself has played an odd role. It has been affirmed repeatedly in theory, but the primary value of its theoretical possibility has been in empowering courts to hear cases they might otherwise have avoided, while failing actually to attribute conduct to two or more entities.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 578 142 7
Full Text Views 535 30 0
PDF Views & Downloads 318 48 1