Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
This contribution assesses compensation practices at the UN through the lens of accountability. It argues that somewhat paradoxically, some UN member states have a better track record than the UN itself where it comes to compensating third parties for harms that occur in conflict areas. The thesis of this contribution is that the UN can improve the immunity – accountability axis by drawing on the best practices of member states in the areas of compensation and victim centred remedies
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 714 | 155 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 124 | 12 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 198 | 38 | 2 |
This contribution assesses compensation practices at the UN through the lens of accountability. It argues that somewhat paradoxically, some UN member states have a better track record than the UN itself where it comes to compensating third parties for harms that occur in conflict areas. The thesis of this contribution is that the UN can improve the immunity – accountability axis by drawing on the best practices of member states in the areas of compensation and victim centred remedies
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 714 | 155 | 17 |
Full Text Views | 124 | 12 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 198 | 38 | 2 |