Save

ARIO and Human Rights Protection: Leaving the Individual in the Cold

In: International Organizations Law Review
Authors:
Armin von Bogdandy
Search for other papers by Armin von Bogdandy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Mateja Steinbrück Platise Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, Germany, E-mail: sekreavb@mpil.de, platise@mpil.de

Search for other papers by Mateja Steinbrück Platise in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

International organizations may be regarded as international public authorities, since their acts increasingly impinge on individuals, private associations, enterprises, States, or public institutions. However, this development has not been followed by the creation of a corresponding system of international legal responsibility for international organizations. Some are even seen as a risk to fundamental rights. The Articles on Responsibility of International Organizations (ARIO) bring some progress in this regard, but nevertheless leave the victims of human rights violations largely overlooked. The article analyses some of the achievements and gaps of ARIO with respect to human rights protection and explores the possibilities for victims of human rights violations to seek remedies against international organizations.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 683 53 7
Full Text Views 309 6 0
PDF Views & Downloads 252 23 0