Are All International Organizations Created Equal?
In: International Organizations Law ReviewSearch for other papers by Jan Wouters in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Jed Odermatt in
Current site
Google Scholar
This contribution briefly discusses the methodological and conceptual issues faced by the ILC during its work on the responsibility of international organizations. It examines some of the key challenges faced by the ILC, including the lack of relevant international practice, and the diversity of international organizations. It argues that while the responsibility of international organizations remains an important topic for international law, the law is not yet developed enough for codification of secondary rules to apply to all international organizations. In some cases, this led the ILC to rely heavily on its Articles of States Responsibility. This approach pushed the work of the ILC closer to ‘progressive development’ of the law than to codification.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
7)
DARIO, General Commentary, p. 2, para. 5.
-
11)
DARIO General Commentary, p. 3, para. 7.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 546 | 105 | 27 |
| Full Text Views | 261 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 140 | 21 | 0 |
Are All International Organizations Created Equal?
In: International Organizations Law ReviewSearch for other papers by Jan Wouters in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jed Odermatt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This contribution briefly discusses the methodological and conceptual issues faced by the ILC during its work on the responsibility of international organizations. It examines some of the key challenges faced by the ILC, including the lack of relevant international practice, and the diversity of international organizations. It argues that while the responsibility of international organizations remains an important topic for international law, the law is not yet developed enough for codification of secondary rules to apply to all international organizations. In some cases, this led the ILC to rely heavily on its Articles of States Responsibility. This approach pushed the work of the ILC closer to ‘progressive development’ of the law than to codification.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 546 | 105 | 27 |
| Full Text Views | 261 | 5 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 140 | 21 | 0 |