Going Against the Grain: When Private Rules Shouldn’t Apply to Public Institutions

In: International Organizations Law Review
Rutsel S.J. Martha General Counsel, International Fund for Agricultural Development,

Search for other papers by Rutsel S.J. Martha in
Current site
Google Scholar
Sarah Dadush Counsel, International Fund for Agricultural Development,

Search for other papers by Sarah Dadush in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


This piece analyzes the institutional challenges and tensions generated by applying the privately produced International Financial Reporting Standards to the financial reporting practices of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), an inter-governmental organization, and specialized agency of the United Nations. The authors question whether the application of the Standards is carried out in the interest of the organization or whether it is rather a product of pressure, both external and internal, to adopt rules that reflect a particular understanding of what constitutes ‘best practice’. The authors draw attention to the fact that best practices often become benchmarks for a wide range of institutions, notwithstanding fundamental institutional differences. They argue that the adoption of externally generated rules must be pursued in a systematically cautious, coordinated, and critical manner in order to avoid producing practices that run against the very grain of a public institution’s constitution and mandate. They also argue that robust governance structures are necessary to avoid institutional digressions.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 296 73 5
Full Text Views 662 10 0
PDF Views & Downloads 28 10 1