Manner implicatures and how to spot them
In: International Review of PragmaticsSearch for other papers by Jessica Rett in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to help develop a general picture of conversational implicature (Grice, 1975) by looking beyond scalar implicature to see how the phenomenon behaves in a general sense. I focus on non-scalar Quantity implicatures and Manner implicatures. I review canonical examples of Manner implicature, as well as a more recent, productive one involving gradable adjective antonym pairs (Rett, 2015). Based on these data, I argue that Manner implicatures—and conversational implicatures generally—are distinguishable primarily by their calculability; their reinforceability; their discourse sensitivity (to the Question Under Discussion; Roberts, 1990; van Kuppevelt, 1995; Simons et al., 2011); and their embeddability (under negation, propositional attitude verbs, quantifiers, etc.). I use these data to draw conclusions about the usefulness of implicature-specific operators and about ways to compositionally represent conversational implicatures.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Bergen, Leon, Roger Levy and Noah Goodman. 2016. Pragmatic reasoning through semantic inference. Semantics and Pragmatics 9: 1–84.
-
Blome-Tillmann, Michael. 2013. Conversational implicatures (and how to spot them). Philosophy Compass 8: 170–185.
-
Blutner, Reinhart. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17: 189–216.
-
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bumford, Dylan and Jessica Rett. In preparation. Embedded manner implicature. Ms., UCLA.
-
Bybee, Joan. 2011. Markedness: Iconicity, economy, and frequency. In J.-J. Song (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, 131–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena and the syntax/pragmatic interface. In A. Beletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond, 39–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox and Benjamin Spector. 2009. The grammatical voice of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In P. Portner (ed.), Handbook of Semantics, 144–158. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
-
Clark, Herbert and Catherine Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber and I. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding, 17–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Cresswell, Max. 1976. The semantics of degree. In B. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.
-
Doetjes, Jenny. 2012. On the (in)compatibility of non-neutral adjectives and measure phrases. In A. Guevara, A. Chernilovskaya and R. Nouwen (eds.), Proceedings of SuB 16. MITWPL.
-
Frank, Michael and Noah Goodman. 2012. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science 33: 69–98.
-
Franke, Michael and G. Jäger. 2015. Probabilistic pragmatics, or why Bayes Rule is probably important for pragmatics. Zeitschrift fuer Sprachwissenschaft 16: 3–44.
-
Geurts, Bart. 2011. Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
-
Heim, Irene. 2007. ‘Little’. In M. Gibson and J. Howell (eds.), Proceedings of SALT XVI, 13–33. CLC Publications.
-
Hirschberg, Julia. 1991. A Theory of Scalar Implicature. New York: Garland.
-
Horn, Laurence. 1972. On the semantic properties of the logical operators in English. PhD Thesis, UCLA.
-
Horn, Laurence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
-
Horn, Laurence. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Horn, Laurence. 1991. Duplex negatio affirmat… the economy of double negation. Chicago Linguistics Society, 27:80–106.
-
Jespersen, Otto. 1965. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: W.W. Norton & Co.
-
Katz, Jerry. 1972. Semantic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
-
Katzir, Roni. 2007. Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 669–690.
-
Kehler, Andrew. 2004. Discourse coherence. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 201–222. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York: Garland Press.
-
Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 1–45.
-
Klein, Ewan. 1982. The interpretation of adjectival comparatives. Journal of Linguistics 18: 113–136.
-
van Kuppevelt, Jan. 1995. Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31: 109–147.
-
van Kuppevelt, Jan. 1996. Inferring from topics: Implicatures as topic-dependent inferences. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 393–443.
-
Ladusaw, William. 1979. Polarity as inherent scope relations. PhD Thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
-
Lakoff, Robin. 1973. The logic of politeness; or, minding your P’s and Q’s. In C. Corum, T. Smith-Stark and A. Weiser (eds.), Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 292–305. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1985. Markedness and antonymy. Journal of Linguistics 21: 397–429.
-
Lepore, Ernest and Matthew Stone. 2013. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Levinson, Stephen. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
-
McCawley, James. 1978. Conversational implicature and the lexicon. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9, 245–259. New York: Academic Press.
-
McCready, Elin. 2012. Emotive equilibria. Linguistics and Philosophy 35: 243–283.
-
Meyer, Marie-Christine. 2014. Deriving Hurford’s Constraint. In T. Snider S. D’Antonio and M. Weigand (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 24, 577–596. CLC Publications.
-
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Potts, Christopher. 2012. Conventional implicature and expressive content. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning 3, 2516–2536. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
-
Potts, Christopher, Daniel Lassiter, Roger Levy and Michael Frank. 2015. Embedded implicatures as pragmatic inferences under compositional lexical uncertainty. Journal of Semantics 33: 755–802.
-
Rett, Jessica. 2015a. Modified numerals and measure phrase equatives. Journal of Semantics 32, 425–475.
-
Rett, Jessica. 2015b. The Semantics of Evaluativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Roberts, Craige. 1990. Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity. New York: Garland Press.
-
van Rooij, Robert. 2004. Signalling games select Horn strategies. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 493–527.
-
Russell, Benjamin. 2006. Against grammatical computation of scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics 23: 361–382.
-
Sadock, Jerrold. 1978. On testing for conversational implicature. In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9, 281–298. New York: Academic Press.
-
van der Sandt, Roba. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9: 333–377.
-
Schaden, Gerhard. 2009. Present perfects compete. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 115–141.
-
Simons, Mandy. 2010. A Gricean view on intrusive implicatures. In K. Petrus (ed.), Meaning and Analysis: New Essays on Grice, 138–169. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
-
Simons, Mandy. 2017. Local pragmatics in a Gricean framework. Inquiry 60: 466–492.
-
Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver and Craige Roberts. 2011. What projects and why. In N. Li and D. Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of SALT XX, 309–327. CLC Publications.
-
Skyrms, Brian. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77.
-
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Tessler, Michael and Michael Franke. 2019. Not unreasonable: Carving vague dimensions with contraries and contradictions. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society: 1108–1113. Cognitive Science Society.
-
Txurruka, Isabel Gómez. 2003. The natural language conjunction ‘and’. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 255–285.
-
Ward, Gregory and Julia Hirschberg. 1991. A pragmatic analysis of tautological utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 15: 507–520.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1346 | 274 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 141 | 56 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 252 | 104 | 0 |
Manner implicatures and how to spot them
In: International Review of PragmaticsSearch for other papers by Jessica Rett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to help develop a general picture of conversational implicature (Grice, 1975) by looking beyond scalar implicature to see how the phenomenon behaves in a general sense. I focus on non-scalar Quantity implicatures and Manner implicatures. I review canonical examples of Manner implicature, as well as a more recent, productive one involving gradable adjective antonym pairs (Rett, 2015). Based on these data, I argue that Manner implicatures—and conversational implicatures generally—are distinguishable primarily by their calculability; their reinforceability; their discourse sensitivity (to the Question Under Discussion; Roberts, 1990; van Kuppevelt, 1995; Simons et al., 2011); and their embeddability (under negation, propositional attitude verbs, quantifiers, etc.). I use these data to draw conclusions about the usefulness of implicature-specific operators and about ways to compositionally represent conversational implicatures.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1346 | 274 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 141 | 56 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 252 | 104 | 0 |