The pragmatics of communicating threat and constructing the future in the discourse of the Iranian Supreme Leader
A proximisation account
In: International Review of PragmaticsSearch for other papers by Ali Basarati in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Fateme Zohrabi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The paper aims at studying how the discourse of the Iranian Supreme Leader communicates threat and how it presents the reality of Iran’s future in light of policy options. Our data comes from 50 speeches of the Iranian Supreme Leader, delivered between 2005–2020. Adopting the Proximisation Theory, we indicate that spatial and axiological threats are conceptualised in the SL’s discourse as encroaching upon the present and future to impact the Islamic Republic of Iran. But, at the same time, the SL’s discourse depicts the impact consequences as relatively remote from Iran’s present and possible to materialise in the future space provided that certain preliminary circumstances are fulfilled. In this regard, aiming to neutralise the construed threats, the SL’s discourse depicts the privileged vision of the future space involving hortatory preemptive policies. We indicate that the SL’s discourse employs the construal of threats to necessitate and justify taking up future-building preemptive policies.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adibzade, Majid. 2008. Zaban, Gofteman va Siyasat-e Khareji: Diyalectic-e Baznamayi az Gharb da Jahan-e Nemadin-e Irani [Language, Discourse and Foreign Policy: The Dialectic Representation of the West in the Iranian Symbolic World]. Tehran: Akhtaran Publications.
-
Anderson, Ben. 2010. Pre-emption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography 34: 777–798.
-
Bell, Wendell. 2009 [1997]. Foundations of Future Studies: History, Purposes, and Knowledge. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
-
Billig, Michael. 2008. The language of critical discourse analysis: The case of nominalization. Discourse & Society 19: 783–800.
-
Cap, Piotr. 2006. Legitimization in Political Discourse: A Cross Disciplinary Perspective on the Modern US War Rhetoric. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
-
Cap, Piotr. 2008. Towards the proximization model of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 17–41.
-
Cap, Piotr. 2010. Axiological aspects of proximization. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 392–407.
-
Cap, Piotr. 2013. Proximization: The Pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
-
Cap, Piotr. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Cap, Piotr. 2018. Spatial cognition. In J. Flowerdew and J. Richardson (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, 92–105. New York, NY: Routledge.
-
Cap, Piotr. 2020. Alternative futures in political discourse. Discourse & Society 32: 328–345.
-
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
-
Chilton, Paul. 2014. Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
de Goede, Marieke and Samuel Randalls. 2009. Precaution, preemption: Arts and technologies of the actionable future. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27: 859–878.
-
Dunmire, Patricia. 2005. Preempting the future: Rhetoric and ideology of the future in political discourse. Discourse and Society 16: 481–513.
-
Dunmire, Patricia. 2007. “Emerging threats” and “coming dangers”. In A. Hodges and C. Nilep (eds), Discourse, War and Terrorism, 19–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
-
Dunmire, Patricia. 2010. Knowing and controlling the future: A review of futurology. Prose Studies 32: 240–263.
-
Dunmire, Patricia. 2011. Projecting the Future through Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
-
Dunmire, Patricia. 2014. American ways of organizing the world: Designing the global future through US National Security Policy. In C. Hart and P. Cap (eds), Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies, 321–345. London: Bloomsbury.
-
Edelman, Murray Jacob. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
-
Edelman, Murray Jacob. 1971. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. Chicago, IL: Markham.
-
Edelman, Murray Jacob. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
-
Elmer, Greg and Andy Opel. 2006. Surviving the inevitable future: Preemption in an age of faulty intelligence. Cultural Studies 20: 477–492.
-
Filardo-Llamas, Laura. 2015. Re-contextualizing political discourse: An analysis of shifting spaces in songs used as a political tool. Critical Discourse Studies 12: 279–296.
-
Graham, Phil. 2001. Space: Irrealis objects in technology policy and their role in a new political economy. Discourse & Society 12: 761–788.
-
Graham, Phil. 2002. Predication and propagation: A method for analyzing evaluative meanings in technology policy. Text & Talk 22: 227–268.
-
Hart, Christopher. 2015. Viewpoint in linguistic discourse: Space and evaluation in news reports of political protests. Critical Discourse Studies 12: 238–260.
-
Jaworski, Adam and Richard Fitzgerald. 2008. ‘This poll has not happened yet’: Temporal play in election predictions. Discourse & Communication 2: 5–27.
-
Kaiser, Mario. 2015. Reactions to the future: The chronopolitics of prevention and preemption. NanoEthics 9: 165–177.
-
Martin, Thomas. 2014. Governing an unknowable future: The politics of Britain’s prevent policy. Critical Studies on Terrorism 7: 62–78.
-
McAllum, Michael. 2017. Reconceiving the Other: Possibilities beyond the seduction of popularist and authoritarian polarities. Journal of Future Studies 21:15–25.
-
Payne, Rodger A. 2005. Deliberating preventive war: The strange case of Iraq’s disappearing nuclear threat. University Review 35: 63–73.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 406 | 298 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 14 | 9 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 86 | 29 | 0 |
The pragmatics of communicating threat and constructing the future in the discourse of the Iranian Supreme Leader
A proximisation account
In: International Review of PragmaticsSearch for other papers by Ali Basarati in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fateme Zohrabi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The paper aims at studying how the discourse of the Iranian Supreme Leader communicates threat and how it presents the reality of Iran’s future in light of policy options. Our data comes from 50 speeches of the Iranian Supreme Leader, delivered between 2005–2020. Adopting the Proximisation Theory, we indicate that spatial and axiological threats are conceptualised in the SL’s discourse as encroaching upon the present and future to impact the Islamic Republic of Iran. But, at the same time, the SL’s discourse depicts the impact consequences as relatively remote from Iran’s present and possible to materialise in the future space provided that certain preliminary circumstances are fulfilled. In this regard, aiming to neutralise the construed threats, the SL’s discourse depicts the privileged vision of the future space involving hortatory preemptive policies. We indicate that the SL’s discourse employs the construal of threats to necessitate and justify taking up future-building preemptive policies.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 406 | 298 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 14 | 9 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 86 | 29 | 0 |
