Understanding Bald-Faced Lies

An Experimental Approach

in International Review of Pragmatics
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Bald-faced lies seem to be lies that lack a typical property of genuine lies, namely the intent of the speaker to deceive the hearer. Therefore, several scholars propose that the intention to deceive should not be part of a proper definition of lying. In contrast to this “non-deceptionist” approach, it has been argued by “deceptionists” that bald-faced lies are either no real lies or that they are connected to an intention to deceive. This paper reports a questionnaire study in which participants were asked whether target utterances in eight cases of putative bald-faced lies were (i) lies, (ii) were deceptive, (iii) and were brazen. Overall, bald-faced lies were considered as lies and as deceptive. With respect to brazenness, participants clearly distinguished between brazen and non-brazen utterances. This shows that the degree of brazenness is an important property of bald-faced lies.

Understanding Bald-Faced Lies

An Experimental Approach

in International Review of Pragmatics

Sections

References

20

Cf. also Danziger (2013) who claims that for Mopan Maya speakers (East Ecuador) the belief component in lying is irrelevant. All that matters for these speakers is factual falsity.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 38 38 19
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0