Save

The preference for approximation

In: International Review of Pragmatics
Authors:
Stephanie Solt Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Germany stephanie.solt@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Stephanie Solt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chris Cummins University of Edinburgh, UK c.r.cummins@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Chris Cummins in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Marijan Palmović University of Zagreb, Croatia marijan.palmovic@erf.hr

Search for other papers by Marijan Palmović in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

A curious fact about the communication of numerical information is that speakers often choose to use approximate or rounded expressions, even when more precise information is available (for instance, reporting the time as ‘three thirty’ when one’s watch reads 3:27). It has been proposed that this tendency towards rounding is driven by a desire to reduce hearers’ processing costs, a specific claim being that rounded values produce the same cognitive effect at less cognitive effort than non-round values (Van der Henst, Carles and Sperber, 2002). To date, however, the posited processing advantage for roundness has not been experimentally substantiated. Focusing on the domain of temporal expressions, we report on two experiments that demonstrate that rounded clock times are easier to remember and manipulate than their non-round counterparts, a finding that provides evidence for the influence of processing considerations on numerical expression choice. We further find a role for domain-specific granularity of measurement.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 441 109 5
Full Text Views 332 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 125 17 0