Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Why Do We Believe Humans Matter More than Other Animals?
In: Journal of Applied Animal Ethics ResearchAbstract
Some recent psychological studies suggest that the belief that humans matter more than other animals can be strengthened by cognitive dissonance. Jaquet (forthcoming) argues that some of these studies also show that the relevant belief is primarily caused by cognitive dissonance and is therefore subject to a debunking argument. We offer an alternative hypothesis according to which we are already speciesist but cognitive dissonance merely enhances our speciesism. We argue that our hypothesis explains the results of the studies at least as well as Jaquet’s. We then respond to a series of objections. Along the way, we highlight various respects in which further studies are needed to decide between Jaquet’s hypothesis and ours.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Jaquet, F. (forthcoming). A debunking argument against speciesism. Synthese, 1‒17. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02080-5.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 305 | 8 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 154 | 95 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 165 | 113 | 0 |
Why Do We Believe Humans Matter More than Other Animals?
In: Journal of Applied Animal Ethics ResearchAbstract
Some recent psychological studies suggest that the belief that humans matter more than other animals can be strengthened by cognitive dissonance. Jaquet (forthcoming) argues that some of these studies also show that the relevant belief is primarily caused by cognitive dissonance and is therefore subject to a debunking argument. We offer an alternative hypothesis according to which we are already speciesist but cognitive dissonance merely enhances our speciesism. We argue that our hypothesis explains the results of the studies at least as well as Jaquet’s. We then respond to a series of objections. Along the way, we highlight various respects in which further studies are needed to decide between Jaquet’s hypothesis and ours.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 305 | 8 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 154 | 95 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 165 | 113 | 0 |