Eating Food Produced in Harmful Ways: Wrongful Complicity or Moral Tragedy?
In: Journal of Applied Animal Ethics ResearchSearch for other papers by Christopher A. Bobier in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Josh Milburn in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Imagine you come across a leftover turkey sandwich that will expire soon, no one is around to eat it, and you cannot donate it to someone else before it goes bad. A new omnivore says that you should eat the sandwich. A common rebuttal to new omnivorism says that by eating the turkey sandwich you become complicit in industrialized animal agriculture: consuming the leftover sandwich amounts to a retroactive endorsement of the institution that produced it. This is the complicity objection to new omnivorism. In this paper, we argue that the complicity objection fails to ethically distinguish new omnivores and vegans. We suggest that we accept that there is no harmless-to-animals diet available, and so, rather than trying to find the impossible, we should confront this morally tragic reality head on. Doing so may support new omnivorism over veganism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abbate, Cheryl, and Christopher Bobier, eds. 2024. New Omnivorism and Strict Veganism: Critical Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003204152.
-
Abbate, Cheryl. 2019. Save the meat for cats: Why it’s wrong to eat roadkill. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32: 165‒182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09763-6.
-
Abbate, Cheryl. 2024. Why eating roadkill is wrong: New consequentialist and deontological perspectives. In. C. Abbate & C. Bobier (eds.), New Omnivorism and Strict Veganism: Critical Perspectives, (pp. 149‒162). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003204152-13.
-
Archer, Mike. 2011a. Ordering the vegetarian meal? There’s more animal blood on your hands. The Conversation. From: https://theconversation.com/ordering-the-vegetarian-meal-theres-more-animal-blood-on-your-hands-4659.
-
Archer, Michael. 2011. Slaughter of the singing sentients: Measuring the morality of eating red meat. Australian Zoologist 35 (4): 979‒982. https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2011.051.
-
Bobier, Christopher. 2021. What would the virtuous person eat? The case for virtuous omnivorism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34 (3): 1‒19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09860-5.
-
Bobier, Christopher. 2024. New omnivore policy: Friend or foe of veganism? In: C. Abbate & C. Bobier (Eds.), New Omnivorism and Strict Veganism: Critical Perspectives, (pp. 249‒265). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003204152-22.
-
Broom, Donald M. 1999. The welfare of vertebrate pests in relation to their management. In: P. D. Cowan & C. J. Feare (Eds.), Advances in Vertebrate Pest Management, (pp. 309‒329). Fürth: Filander Verlag.
-
Bruckner, Donald W. 2015. Strict vegetarianism is immoral. In: B. Bramble & B. Fischer (Eds.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat, (pp. 30‒47). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199353903.003.0003.
-
Cochrane, Alasdair. 2012. Animal Rights Without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligations. New York: Colombia University Press.
-
Davis, Steven L. 2003. The least harm principle may require that humans consume a diet containing large herbivores, not a vegan diet. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (4): 387‒394. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025638030686.
-
Demetriou, Dan, and Bob Fischer. 2018. Dignitarian hunting. Social Theory and Practice 44 (1): 49–73. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201811928.
-
Driver, Julia. 2015. Individual consumption and moral complicity. In: B. Bramble & B. Fischer (Eds.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat, (pp. 67‒79). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199353903.003.0005.
-
Fischer, Bob, and Andy Lamey. 2018. Field deaths in plant agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (4): 409‒428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9733-8.
-
Fischer, Bob. 2016. Bugging the strict vegan. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2): 255‒263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9599-y.
-
Francione, Gary L. 2000. Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog? Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
Galvin, Richard, and John R. Harris. 2023. Causal impotence and complicity. Public Affairs Quarterly 37 (1): 47‒63. https://doi.org/10.5406/21520542.37.1.03.
-
Gruen, Lori, and Robert Jones. 2016. Veganism as an aspiration. In B. Bramble & B. Fischer (Eds.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat, (pp. 153‒171). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199353903.003.0010.
-
Hampton, Jordan O., Timothy H. Hyndman, Benjamin L. Allen, and Bob Fischer. 2021. Animal harms and food production: Informing ethical choices. Animals 11 (5): 1225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051225.
-
Hsiao, Timothy, 2015. In defense of eating meat. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28: 277‒291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9534-2.
-
Killoren, David. 2021. Causal impotence and veganism: Recent developments and possible ways forward. In: L. Wright (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Vegan Studies, (pp. 111‒121). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003020875-12/.
-
Lamey, Andy. 2007. Food fight! Davis versus Regan on the ethics of eating beef. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (2): 331‒348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00382.x.
-
Lamey, Andy. 2019. Duty and the Beast: Should We Eat Meat in the Name of Animal Rights? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/978131667269.
-
Lamey, Andy. 2024. Is there a freegan challenge to veganism? In: C. Abbate & C. Bobier (Eds.) New Omnivorism and Strict Veganism: Critical Perspectives, (pp. 35‒52). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003204152-4.
-
Martin, Adrienne M. 2016. Factory farming and consumer complicity. In: A. Chignell, T. Cuneo, and M. C. Halteman (Eds.) Philosophy Comes to Dinner: Arguments about the Ethics of Eating, (pp. 203‒214). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154410-14.
-
Matheny, Gaverick. 2003. Least harm: A defense of vegetarianism from Steven Davis’s omnivorous proposal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5): 505‒511. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026354906892.
-
McPherson, Tristram. 2016. Why I am a vegan (and you should be one too). In: A. Chignell, T. Cuneo, and M. C. Halteman (Eds.) Philosophy Comes to Dinner: Arguments about the Ethics of Eating, (pp. 73‒91). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154410-9780203154416.
-
Milburn, Josh, and Chris Bobier. 2022. New omnivorism: a novel approach to food and animal ethics. Food Ethics 7: 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-022-00098-z.
-
Milburn, Josh, and Bob Fischer. 2021. The freegan challenge to veganism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 34: 17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-021-09859-y.
-
Milburn, Josh. 2022. Just Fodder: The Ethics of Feeding Animals. Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
-
Milburn, Josh. 2023. Food, Justice, and Animals: Feeding the World Respectfully. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Milburn, Josh. 2024. Freeganism: a (cautious) defense. I:n C. Abbate & C. Bobier (Eds.) New Omnivorism and Strict Veganism: Critical Perspectives, (pp. 17‒34). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003204152-3.
-
Nefsky, Julia. 2018. Consumer choice and collective impact. In: A. Barnhill, M. Budolfson, & T. Doggert (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Food Ethics, (pp. 267‒286). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199372263.013.23.
-
Nellemann, Christian, Lera Miles, Bjørn P. Kaltenborn, Melanie Virtue, and Hugo Ahlenius (Eds). 2007. The Last Stand of the Orangutan—State of Emergency: Illegal Logging, Fire and Palm Oil in Indonesia’s National Parks. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal, Norway.
-
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. The costs of tragedy: Some moral limits of cost-benefit analysis. The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (S2): 1005‒1036. https://doi.org/10.1086/468103.
-
Persistence Market Research. 2021. Pesticides Sales to Touch US$ 188 Bn by 2031, Owing to Significant Demand for Maximum Yield & Increase Lifespan of Crops: PMR. From: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/pesticides-sales-to-touch-us-188-bn-by-2031-owing-to-significant-demand-for-maximum-yield--increase-lifespan-of-crops-pmr-301430787.html.
-
Robison-Greene, Rachel. 2024. In vitro meat, edibility, and moral properties. In. C. Abbate & C. Bobier (Eds.), New Omnivorism and Strict Veganism: Critical Perspectives, (pp. 101‒116). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324_9781003204152-9.
-
Schedler, George. 2005. Does ethical meat eating maximize utility? Social Theory and Practice 31 (4): 499‒511. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200531422.
-
Shriver, Adam. 2024. Gene editing to reduce suffering. In. C. Abbate & C. Bobier (Eds.), New Omnivorism and Strict Veganism: Critical Perspectives, (pp. 219‒229). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324_9781003204152-19.
-
Singleton, Grant R., Steven Belmain, Peter R. Brown, Ken Aplin, and Nyo Me Htwe. 2010. Impacts of rodent outbreaks on food security in Asia. Wildlife Research 37 (5): 355‒359. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR10084.
-
Watt, Barbara E., Alex T. Proudfoot, Sally M. Bradberry, and J. Allister Vale. 2005. Anticoagulant rodenticides. Toxicological Reviews 24 (4): 259‒269. https://doi.org/10.2165/00139709-200524040-00005.
-
Williams, Kent, Ian Parer, Brian Coman, John Burley, J. and Mike Braysher. 1995. Managing Vertebrate Pests: Rabbits. Canberra: Bureau of Resource Sciences/CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Australian Government Publishing Service.
-
Wills, Joe. 2018. The intentional killing of field animals and ethical veganism. In Ethical Vegetarianism and Veganism, edited by Andrew Linzey and Clair Linzey, (pp. 254‒264). Abingdon: Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780429490743-24.
-
Zangwill, Nick. 2021. Our moral duty to eat meat. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 7 (3): 295‒311. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2020.21.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 139 | 139 | 139 |
| Full Text Views | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 12 | 12 | 12 |
Eating Food Produced in Harmful Ways: Wrongful Complicity or Moral Tragedy?
In: Journal of Applied Animal Ethics ResearchSearch for other papers by Christopher A. Bobier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Josh Milburn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Imagine you come across a leftover turkey sandwich that will expire soon, no one is around to eat it, and you cannot donate it to someone else before it goes bad. A new omnivore says that you should eat the sandwich. A common rebuttal to new omnivorism says that by eating the turkey sandwich you become complicit in industrialized animal agriculture: consuming the leftover sandwich amounts to a retroactive endorsement of the institution that produced it. This is the complicity objection to new omnivorism. In this paper, we argue that the complicity objection fails to ethically distinguish new omnivores and vegans. We suggest that we accept that there is no harmless-to-animals diet available, and so, rather than trying to find the impossible, we should confront this morally tragic reality head on. Doing so may support new omnivorism over veganism.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 139 | 139 | 139 |
| Full Text Views | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 12 | 12 | 12 |