The Specter of Yalta: Asia Firsters and the Development of Conservative Internationalism

in Journal of American-East Asian Relations
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

During the 1940s, conservative leaders in the United States turned to the emerging Cold War in Asia both to condemn the moral bankruptcy of liberal globalism and to establish their own brand of anti-Communist internationalism. “Asia Firsters” such as Senators William F. Knowland, John W. Bricker, and Robert A. Taft evoked the specter of Yalta and Roosevelt’s betrayal of Nationalist China as a signature issue which extended far beyond the question of who “lost” China. Yalta served as a touchstone for the right’s ideological and political development during the Cold War. Focusing on U.S.-People’s Republic-Taiwan relations during the early and mid-1950s, this article traces how initial criticism of the 1945 agreements quickly evolved into practical legislative proposals that addressed executive overreach, legislative oversight, collective international peacekeeping, opposition to Beijing’s admission to the United Nations, and constitutional principles vis-à-vis active global interventionism. Although Asia Firsters failed to substantively change China policy, their approach was an inspiration for the most enduring American political movement of the postwar period.

Sections

References

4

Fraser Harbutt, Yalta 1945: Europe and America at the Crossroads (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 320-22.

5

Ross Y. Koen, The China Lobby in American Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1960), 56-57.

6

Robert H. W. Welch, Jr., The Life of John Birch (Chicago: Regnery, 1954), 72-73.

7

Robert Welch, The Blue Book of the John Birch Society (Appleton, WI: Western Islands, 2000), 6-7.

11

Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, The China Threat: Memories, Myths, and Realities in the 1950s (New York: Columbia University Press, 2012), 25-29.

12

Clarence E. Wunderlin, Robert A. Taft: Ideas, Tradition, and Party in U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005), 128-29; Joseph Lang, “Don’t Sell Yourself to Become a Slave of Government,” enclosed in Walter to Martin, 25 Apr. 1950, box 295, Robert A. Taft Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.

13

Koen, China Lobby, 27-85; Keeley, China Lobby Man.

16

Hoover to Knowland, 31 Dec. 1949, carton 273, “Corr. – Special: Hoover, Herbert,” ibid.

19

Phillip A. Grant, “The Bricker Amendment Controversy,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 15 (Summer 1985), 572.

21

Duane Tanenbaum, The Bricker Amendment Controversy: A Test of Eisenhower’s Political Leadership (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988), 49-53.

23

Cathal J. Nolan, “The Last Hurrah of Conservative Isolationism: Eisenhower, Congress, and the Bricker Amendment,” Presidential Studies Quarterly 22 (Spring 1992).

27

Chang, Friends and Enemies, 117-18; Richard C. Bush, At Cross Purposes: U.S. Taiwan Relations since 1942 (Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 2004), 96-97.

28

Leonard H. D. Gordon, “United States Opposition to the Use of Force in the Taiwan Strait, 1954-1962,” Journal of American History 72 (December 1985), 638-39; Nancy Bernkopf Tucker, ed., China Confidential: American Diplomats and Sino-American Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001), 80-81.

29

Michael Schaller, The United States and China: Into the Twenty-first Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), 148; Chang, Friends and Enemies, 116.

31

Gordon Chang, “To the Nuclear Brink: Eisenhower, Dulles, and the Quemoy-Matsu Crisis,” International Security 12 (Spring 1988); Gordon H. Chang and He Di, “The Absence of War in the U.S.-China Confrontation over Quemoy and Matsu in 1954-1955: Contingency, Luck, Deterrence,” American Historical Review 98 (December 1993), 1519.

36

Tanenbaum, Bricker Amendment Controversy, 25.

39

C. P. Fitzgerald, “East Asia after Bandung,” Far Eastern Survey 24 (August 1955), 113-19; George T. Yu, “China's Role in Africa,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 432 (July 1977); Chen Jian, “China and the Bandung Conference: Changing Perceptions and Representations,” in See Seng Tan and Amitav Acharya, eds., Bandung Revisited: A Conference’s Legacy and Relevance for International Order (Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2008), 132-35.

41

Arthur Dean, “United States Foreign Policy and Formosa,” Foreign Affairs, April 1955.

48

William Henry Chamberlin, “From Yalta to Formosa,” Human Events, 12 Feb. 1955, reprint in State Department Files, carton 285, “Human Events: From Yalta to Formosa,” Knowland Papers.

53

Tucker, China Threat, 27-28.

56

Dulles to Knowland, Aug. 1956, carton 247, “Corr. – Dulles, John Foster (I),” Knowland Papers; John Foster Dulles, Advance copy (25 June 1957) of speech to be delivered before Lions International in San Francisco, 28 June 1957, State Department Files, carton 284, “Secretary of State Files, 1956-1958 (II),” ibid.; Knowland to Dulles, 27 June 1957, ibid.

60

“Taiwan Relations Act, 1979,” <http://china.usc.edu/ShowArticle.aspx?articleID=393&AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=> (acc. 31 May 2011); Schaller, United States and China, 190.

61

Elisabeth Bumiller, “White House letter: In row over Yalta, Bush pokes at Baltic politics,” New York Times, 16 May 2005, <http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/15/world/americas/15iht-letter.html> (acc. 30 May 2012).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 7
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0