‘Why Korea Failed?’: The American Discourse of Korea’s Historical Failure at the Turn of the 20th Century
In: Journal of American-East Asian RelationsAbstract
The discourse of Korea’s failed history has been mostly a production of Japanese colonial scholarship, but the early texts that American authors produced were what guided the Western understanding of Korean history during the long 20th Century. Despite the importance of these texts that left significant imprints on later academic works and policy decisions, scholars have not as yet examined properly the American discourse of failure in Korean history. This article analyzes the representative American books on Korean history of authors William E. Griffis and Homer B. Hulbert to describe the emergence of the American discourse of Korea’s failed history in the late 19th and the early 20th centuries. It argues that early American authors of accounts of Korean history wrote them in a specific narrative structure that depicted Korea’s past as a story of gradual decline that ended with failure. These works identify three major themes – isolation, victimization, and dependency – as explanations for why Korea failed. Then, the article examines the doctoral dissertations of Harold J. Noble and George M. McCune to show how this early narrative framework during the 1930s and the 1940s continued thereafter to shape U.S. understanding of Korea even into the 1950s, informing both policymakers and scholars.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Griffis, William E. Corea: The Hermit Nation. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1882.
-
Griffis, William E. The Mikado’s Empire. New York: Harper, 1877.
-
Hulbert, Homer B. The History of Korea. 2 Vols. Seoul: Methodist Publishing House, 1905.
-
Hulbert, Homer B. Passing of Korea. New York: Doubleday, Page and Company, 1906.
-
Dallet, Claude-Charles. Historie de l’egalise de Coree [The History of the Church of Korea]. 2 Vols. Paris: V Palmé, 1874.
-
Kim, Chong Ik Eugene, and Han-Kyo Kim. Korea and the Politics of Imperialism, 1876- 1910. Berkeley: University of California, Press, 1967.
-
McCune, George M. Korea Today. Boston: Harvard University Press, 1950.
-
McCune, George M. “Korean Relations with China and Japan.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Berkeley, 1941. Berkeley, CA.
-
Noble, Harold Joyce. “Korea and Her Relations with the United States before 1895.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Berkeley, 1931. Berkeley, CA.
-
U.S. Department of State. North Korea: A Case Study in the Techniques of Takeover. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1961.
-
An Chŏng-Chŏl. “Williŏm Kripisŭ ŭi ilbon gwa han’guk insik, 1876–1910” [“William E. Griffis’s perception of Japan and Korea”]. Ilbon Yŏn’gu [Journal of Japanese Studies] 15 (2011): 439–62.
-
Brooks, Noah. “Awakened Japan.” Scribner’s Monthly 3 (April 1872): 669–72.
-
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference – New Edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
-
Chang Ch’ae-yŏng. “Kŭndae sŏyangin ŭi chŏsul e natanan Han’guksa insik” [“Modern Westerner’s Perception of Korean History”]. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Kangwŏn University, 2016. Ch’unch’ŏn, Republic of Korea.
-
Chang Sei-Jin. “Raishawŏ, Tongasia, kwŏllyŏk/chisik ŭi t’ek’ŭnoloji–Chŏnhu Miguk ŭi chiyŏk yŏn’gu wa Han’gukak ŭi paech’i” [“Edwin O. Reischauer, East Asia, and the technology of power/knowledge”]. Sanghur Hakbo [Journal of Korean Modern Literature] 6 (October 2012): 87–140.
-
Cheong, Sung-hwa, “William Elliot Griffis and Emerging American Images on Korea.” Review of Korean Studies 3, No. 2 (2000): 53–72.
-
Cho Tong-gŏl. “Singmin sahak ŭi sŏngnip kwajŏngkwa kŭndaesa sŏsul” [“The construction of Japanese colonial scholarship and the modern historiography of Korea”]. Yŏksa kyoyuk nonjip [History Education Review] 13 (1990): 749–806.
-
Em, Henry H. The Great Enterprise: Sovereignty and Historiography in Modern Korea. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013.
-
Fabian, Johannes. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.
-
Henning, Joseph M. Outposts of Civilization: Race, Religion, and Formative Years of American-Japanese Relations. New York: New York University Press, 2000.
-
Hulbert, Homer B. History of Korea. 2 Vols. Clarence M. Weems, ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Limited, 1962.
-
Kang Chin-ch’ŏl. “Chŏngch’esŏng iron pip’an” [“A Critique against the Stagnation Theory”]. Han’guksa siminganjwa [Citizens’ Forum on Korean History] 1 (1987): 23–39.
-
Kim Tong-jin. Parannun ŭi Han’guk hon, Hŏlbŏtŭ [Hulbert: A Korean Soul with Blue Eyes]. Seoul: Cham Joŭn Chin’gu, 2010.
-
Kim Kisŏk. “Hanguk ŭl sarang han sŏyangin Hŏlbŏtŭ–Taehan cheguk ŭi majimak milsa” [“Hulbert, last envoy sent by King Kojong”]. Han’guksa siminganjwa [Citizens’ Forum on Korean History] 34 (2004): 81–92.
-
Kraus, Charles. “American Orientalism in Korea.” Journal of American-East Asian Relations 22, No. 2 (2015): 147–65.
-
Ledyard, Gari. “A Short History of Korea by the Center for East Asia Cultural Studies.” Journal of American Oriental Society 85, No. 3 (July-September 1965): 456–57.
-
McDougal, Walter A. The Tragedy of U.S. Foreign Policy: How America’s Civil Religion Betrayed the National Interest. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2019.
-
Oak, Sung-Deuk. “North American Missionaries’ Understanding of Tan’gun and Kija Myths of Korea, 1884–1934.” Acta Koreana 4 (2002): 1–21.
-
Okudaira Takehiko. Chosen kaikoku kosho shimatsu [The Beginning and End of Chosŏn’s Opening and Association]. Tokyo: Toko Shoin, 1935.
-
Oh Sang-mee. “Hulbŏtŭŭi Munmyŏngguk Chidoron kwa Chosŏn” [“A Study of H. B. Hulbert’s Opinion on Korean Modernization and His Attitude Toward Japanese Colonialism”], Haklim [Scholars’ Forest] 32 (2011): 1–47.
-
Preston, Andrew. Sword of the Spirit, Shield of Faith: Religion in American War and Diplomacy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2012.
-
Roan, Jeanette. Envisioning Asia: On Location, Travel and the Cinematic Geography of U.S. Orientalism. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010
-
Schmid, Andre. Korea Between Empires, 1895–1919. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
-
Schmid, Andre. “Oriental singminjuŭi ŭi tojon: Anglo-American pip’an ŭi han’gye” [“The Challenge of Oriental Colonialism: The Limits of the Criticism by Anglo-American”]. Yŏksa Munje Yŏn’gu [Critical Studies of Modern Korean History] 12 (2004): 157–86.
-
So, John. “Hŏlbŏtŭ sŏnkyosaŭi han’guksa yŏn’gu” [“Research on primary sources of Homer B. Hulbert’s Korean history”]. Taehak kwa sŏnkyo [University and Christian Mission] 30 (June 2016): 103–24.
-
Son Chŏng-suk. “Kuhanmal Hŏlbŏtŭŭi taehan insik kwa kŭ hwaldong” [“Homer B. Hulbert’s Perception of Korea and His Activities in Late Nineteenth Century”]. Ewha Sahak Yŏngu [Ewha Historical Studies] 22 (1995): 127–47
-
To Myŏn-hoe and Yun Hae-dong. Yŏksahak ŭi segi: 20-segi Han’guk kwa Ilbon ŭi yŏksahak [The Century of Historiography: The historiography of Korea and Japan during 20th century]. Seoul: Hyumŏnisŭtŭ Ch’ulp’an Kŭrup, 2000.
-
White, Hayden. The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987.
-
Yi T’ae-jin. “Kŭndae Han’guk ŭn kwayŏn ŭndun’guk iŏtton’ga?” [“Was Korea really a hermit kingdom?”]. Han’guksaron [Journal of Korean History] 42 (1999): 717–49.
-
Yi T’ae-jin. “Tangp’asŏngnon pip’an” [“A critique of discussions on factionalism”]. Han’guksa siminganjwa [Citizens’ Forum on Korean History] 1 (1987): 53–69.
-
Yi Yŏng-mi. “Hanmi sugyo ijŏn ŭi sŏyangin ŭi Hanguk yŏksa sŏsul” [“Korean history writing prior to Korea-U.S.Treaty”]. Hanguksa yŏn’gu [Journal of Korean History] 148 (2010): 169–97.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 111 | 111 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 37 | 4 |
‘Why Korea Failed?’: The American Discourse of Korea’s Historical Failure at the Turn of the 20th Century
In: Journal of American-East Asian RelationsAbstract
The discourse of Korea’s failed history has been mostly a production of Japanese colonial scholarship, but the early texts that American authors produced were what guided the Western understanding of Korean history during the long 20th Century. Despite the importance of these texts that left significant imprints on later academic works and policy decisions, scholars have not as yet examined properly the American discourse of failure in Korean history. This article analyzes the representative American books on Korean history of authors William E. Griffis and Homer B. Hulbert to describe the emergence of the American discourse of Korea’s failed history in the late 19th and the early 20th centuries. It argues that early American authors of accounts of Korean history wrote them in a specific narrative structure that depicted Korea’s past as a story of gradual decline that ended with failure. These works identify three major themes – isolation, victimization, and dependency – as explanations for why Korea failed. Then, the article examines the doctoral dissertations of Harold J. Noble and George M. McCune to show how this early narrative framework during the 1930s and the 1940s continued thereafter to shape U.S. understanding of Korea even into the 1950s, informing both policymakers and scholars.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 111 | 111 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 37 | 4 |