The U.S.-China Trade War and Policy Resilience
In: Journal of American-East Asian RelationsSearch for other papers by Edward Ashbee in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Steven Hurst in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
One can attribute the Trump administration’s pursuit of a trade war against the People’s Republic of China (prc) to a range of variables, including its re-election hopes, commitment to protectionism as an economic weapon, fears about Beijing’s pursuit of artificial intelligence, and broader strategic concerns about the global balance of power. This article argues that another explanation for President Donald J. Trump’s ability to change trade policy towards China was the structural weaknesses of the trade policy regime that emerged at the end of the 1990s when Congress adopted Permanent Normal Trade Relations as a designation for free trade in July 1998 and the prc joined the World Trade Organization in December 2001. Those weaknesses owed much to the ways in which the United States initially framed the new trade regime with the prc and the limited, only partially conclusive, character of the debate that took place at the time. Despite the growth and embedding of supply chains between China and the United States, these inbuilt weaknesses contributed to the progressive erosion of the trade policy regime during the years that followed. Within this context, few constituencies were ready to lobby for the prc after January 2017 and the Trump administration faced little opposition to its change of trade policy.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Clinton, William J. “Full Text of Clinton’s Speech on China Trade Bill,” 9 March 2000, New York Times, https://www.iatp.org/sites/default/files/Full_Text_of_Clintons_Speech_on_China_Trade_Bi.htm.
-
Congressional-Executive Commission on China. “2016 Annual Report,” 6 October 2016, https://china.usc.edu/congressional-executive-commission-china-2016-annual-report-oct-6-2016.
-
Congressional-Executive Commission on China. About. Washington, DC: Congressional-Executive Commission on China, 2018, https://www.cecc.gov/about.
-
Congressional Research Service. “Made in China 2025.” Industrial Policies: Issues for Congress, 11 August 2020, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/IF10964.pdf.
-
Office of Hillary Rodham Clinton. “Hillary on the Issues: Manufacturing.” https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/manufacturing/.
-
Office of the Federal Register. National Archives and Records Administration. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States. William J. Clinton. 1994. Book 1: January 1- July 31. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995.
-
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. The People’s Republic of China. Washington, DC: Office of the US Trade Representative, 2018, https://ustr.gov/countries-regions/china-mongolia-taiwan/peoples-republic-china.
-
Pompeo, Michael R. “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” Speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum, Yorba Linda, CA, 23 July 2020,https://www.State.Gov/Communist-China-And-The-Free-Worlds-Future/.
-
United Nations Secretary General, Independent Group on Climate Finance. “Delivering on the $100 Billion Climate Finance Commitment and Transforming Climate Finance.” United Nations: December 2020.
-
The White House. “Quad Leaders Joint Statement: ‘The Spirit of the Quad’,” 12 March 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/.
-
The White House. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, 2017, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905-2.pdf.
-
Aoki, Yohsuke, Dong Liu, Shaoyu Sun, Tian Wang, Xi Wang, and Annie Yang Zhou. “Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the United States.” The Brookings Institution, n.d., https://www.sipa.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/migrated/migrated/documents/AY13_Brookings_FinalReport.pdf.
-
Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson. The China Shock: Learning from Labor Market Adjustment to Large Changes in Trade. Washington DC: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016.
-
Bowman, Bradley and Andrew Gabel. “US, India Bolster Their Military Partnership in Tiger Triumph Exercise.” Defense News, 13 November 2019, https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2019/11/13/us-india-bolster-their-military-partnership-in-tiger-triumph-exercise.
-
Brinks, Daniel M., Steven Levitsky, and Maria Victoria Murillo. “The Political Origins of Institutional Weakness.” In The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America. Daniel M. Brinks, Steven Levitsky and Maria Victoria Murillo, Eds., 1–40. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
-
Business Roundtable. The Impact of Increased Trade with China on the 50 States. Washington, DC: Business Roundtable, 2000.
-
Campbell, John L. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
-
Campbell, Kurt M. and Ely Ratner. “The China Reckoning: How Beijing Defied American Expectations.” Foreign Affairs 97, No. 2 (March/April 2018): 60–70.
-
Center for Public Integrity. “The Trading Game: Inside Lobbying for the North American Free Trade Agreement.” Washington DC: Center for Public Integrity, 1993, https://cloudfront-files-1.publicintegrity.org/legacy_projects/pdf_reports/THETRADINGGAME.pdf.
-
Chaudoin, Stephen, Helen V. Milner, and Dustin H. Tingley. ”The Center Still Holds: Liberal Internationalism Survives.” International Security 35, No. 1 (Summer 2010): 75–94.
-
Chorzempa, Martin and Gary Clyde Hufbauer. “Trump Awaits Congress on Investment and Technology Controls.” Peterson Institute for International Economics, 9 July 2018, https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policy-watch/trump-awaits-congress-investment-and-technology-controls.
-
Collier, Ruth Berins and David Collier. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002.
-
Cooper, William H. The Jackson-Vanik Amendment and Candidate Countries for WTO Accession: Issues for Congress. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, 26 July 2012, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RS22398.pdf.
-
Davis, Bob, Lingling Wei, and William Mauldin. “US, China Sign Trade Agreement.” Wall Street Journal, 16 January 2020, p. A7.
-
Devereux, Charan, Robert Z. Lawrence, and Michael D. Watkins. Case Studies in US Trade Negotiation. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 2006.
-
Donnan, Shawn. “Business Groups Fire Warning Shot over nafta shake-up.” Financial Times, 24 August 2017, https://www.ft.com/content/f8bd9e3c-88e3-11e7-bf50-e1c239b45787.
-
Federal Election Commission. “Election and Voting Information,” https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/election-and-voting-information/ (accessed 24 April 2023).
-
Feldman, Noah. “The Cool War Continues.” Democracy: A Journal of Ideas 52 (Spring 2019): 7–15.
-
Gass, Nick. “Trump: ‘We Can’t Continue to Allow China to Rape our Country’.” Politico.com, 2 May 2016, https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/05/trump-china-rape-america-222689 (accessed October 25 2020).
-
Goldmann Kai. Change and Stability in Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press 2018.
-
Goldstein, Judith. “Symposium on the Biden Administration and the International Legal Order: A New Era for Trade?” ajil [American Journal of International Law] Unbound 115 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2020.91.
-
Goldstein, Judith and Robert Gulotty. “America and Trade Liberalization: The Limits of Institutional Reform.” International Organization 68, No. 2 (Spring 2014): 263–95.
-
Gould, Joe. “Compromise Defense Bill Confronts a Rising China.” Defence News, 3 December 2020, https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2020/12/03/compromise-defense-bill-confronts-a-rising-china/.
-
Hanemann, Thilo, Daniel H. Rosen, and Cassie Gao. “Two-Way Street: 2017 Update US-China Direct Investment Trends.” Rhodium Group & The National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, May 2017, https://rhg.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/RHG_Two-Way-Street_2017-Update_Final_9May2017.pdf.
-
Hillman, Jennifer and David Sachs. “China’s Belt and Road: Implications for the United States.” Council on Foreign Relations, Independent Task Force Report no 79, 2021, https://www.cfr.org/report/chinas-belt-and-road-implications-for-the-united-states/findings.
-
Holt, Phillip. “A Truly Friendly Neighbor?: The Motivations Behind China’s Belt and Road Initiative in its Periphery.” Institute of World Politics, 17 June 2020, https://www.iwp.edu/articles/2020/06/17/a-truly-friendly-neighbor-the-motivations-behind-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-in-its-periphery/
-
Human Rights Watch. “World Report 2021: China, Events of 2020,”2021 https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2021/country-chapters/china-and-tibet.
-
“In Bush’s Words: ‘Join Together in Making China a Normal Trading Partner’.” New York Times, 18 May 2000, https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/18/world/in-bush-s-words-join-together-in-making-china-a-normal-trading-partner.html.
-
Jessop, Bob. “Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State-Theoretical Perspective.” Antipode 34, No. 3 (2002): 452–72.
-
Johnston, Alastair Iain. “How New and Assertive is China’s New Assertiveness?” International Security 37, No. 4 (Spring 2013): 7–48.
-
Johnston, Alastair Iain. “The Failures of the ‘Failure of Engagement’ With China.” Washington Quarterly 42, No. 2 (2019): 99–114.
-
Jones, Jeffrey M. “Americans Think Increased Trade with China Will Help U.S. Economy but Hurt Workers.” Gallup, 17 May 2000, https://news.gallup.com/poll/2893/americans-think-increased-trade-china-will-help-us-economy.aspx.
-
Kahane, Leo H. “Congressional Voting Patterns on nafta: An Empirical Analysis.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 55, No. 4 (October 1996): 395–409.
-
Kleistra, Yvonne and Igor Mayer. “Stability and Flux in Foreign Affairs: Modelling Policy and Organizational Change.” Cooperation and Conflict 36, No. 4 (December 2001): 381–414.
-
Krasner, Stephen D. “United States Commercial and Monetary Policy: Unravelling the Paradox of External Strength and Internal Weakness.” In Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Peter Katzenstein, Ed., 51–88. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.
-
Lampton, David M. “America’s China Policy in the Age of the Finance Minister: Clinton Ends Linkage.” China Quarterly 139 (September 1996): 597–622.
-
Lardy, Nicholas R. “China’s wto Membership.” Brookings Institution, 1 April 1999, https://www.brookings.edu/research/chinas-wto-membership/.
-
Lardy, Nicholas R. “Permanent Normal Trade Relations for China.” Brookings Institution Policy Brief 58 (May 2000), https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/pb58.pdf.
-
Lardy, Nicholas R. “Issues in China’s wto Accession.” Brookings Institution, 9 May 2001, https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/issues-in-chinas-wto-accession/.
-
Levitsky, Steven and Maria Victoria Murillo. “Variation in Institutional Strength.” Annual Review of Political Science 12, No. 1 (June 2009): 115–33.
-
Levitsky, Steven and Maria Victoria Murillo. “Lessons from Latin America: Building Institutions on Weak Foundations.” Journal of Democracy 24, No. 2 (April 2013): 93–107.
-
Lincicome, Scott. “Testing the ‘China Shock’: Was Normalizing Trade with China a Mistake?” Cato Institute, Policy Analysis, No. 895, 8 July 2020, https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2020-07/PA-895-doi.pdf.
-
Lowndes, Vivien and Maximilian Lempriere. “Understanding Variation in Processes of Institutional Formation.” Political Studies, 66, No.1 (February 2018): 226–44.
-
Lynch, David J. “Trump’s China Crackdown Enjoys Wide Support. Here’s Why That Could be a Problem for Him.” Washington Post, 23 June 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/trumps-china-crackdown-enjoys-wide-support-heres-why-that-could-be-a-problem-for-him/2018/06/23/9423951e-7652-11e8-805c-4b67019fcfe4_story.html.
-
May, Peter J. “Implementation Failures Revisited: Policy Regime Perspectives.” Public Policy and Administration 30, No. 3–4 (July-October 2015): 277–99.
-
Mufson, Steven. “This Was Not the Dream for U.S.-China Trade.” Washington Post, 15 June 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/this-was-not-the-dream-for-us-china-trade/2018/06/15/fef3b794-6a8a-11e8-bea7-c8eb28bc52b1_story.html.
-
Nokken, Timothy P. “The Ideological Ends Against the Middle: House Roll Call Votes on Normal Trade Relation Status for China, 1990–2000.” Congress and the Presidency 30, No. 2 (2003): 53–70.
-
On the Issues. “Bernie Sanders on Free Trade,” 18 August 2016, https://www.ontheissues.org/2016/bernie_sanders_free_trade.htm.
-
Pew Research Center. “Post-Seattle Support for wto,” 2 March 2000, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2000/03/02/post-seattle-support-for-wto/.
-
Pew Research Center. “Issues and the 2016 Campaign,” 18 August 2016a, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/08/18/5-issues-and-the-2016-campaign/.
-
Pew Research Center. “Top Voting Issues in 2016 Election,” 7 July 2016b, https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/07/07/4-top-voting-issues-in-2016-election/.
-
Pew Research Center. “Support For Free Trade Agreements Rebounds Modestly, but Wide Partisan Differences Remain,” 25 April 2017, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/25/support-for-free-trade-agreements-rebounds-modestly-but-wide-partisan-differences-remain/.
-
Pierce, Justin R. and Peter K Schott. “The Surprisingly Swift Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment.” American Economic Review 106, No. 7 (July 2016): 1632–62.
-
Pierson, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, No. 2 (June 2000): 251–67.
-
Pierson, Paul. “Public policies as institutions.” In Rethinking Political Institutions: The Art of the State. In Ian Shapiro, Stephen Skowronek, and Daniel Galvin, Eds., 114–31. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
-
Pillsbury, Michael. The Hundred Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2015.
-
Porter, Patrick. “Why America’s Grand Strategy Has Not Changed: Power, Habit and the U.S. Foreign Policy Establishment.” International Security 42, No. 4 (Spring 2018): 9–46.
-
Rushe, Dominic. “Here are the Reasons for Trump’s Economic War With China.” The Guardian, 23 August 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/aug/23/trump-china-economic-war-why-reasons.
-
Salam, Reihan. “Normalizing Trade Relations with China was a Mistake.” The Atlantic, 8 June 2018, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/06/normalizing-trade-relations-with-china-was-a- mistake/562403/.
-
Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929–1930 Revision of the Tariff. Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1963.
-
Scott, Robert E. “The High Cost of the China-wto Deal.” Economic Policy Institute, 1 February 2000, https://www.epi.org/publication/issuebriefs_ib137/.
-
Scott, Robert E. and Zane Mokhiber. The China Toll Deepens. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 2018.
-
Stracqualursi, Veronica. “10 Times Trump Attacked China and its Trade Relations With the U.S.” abcNews.com, 9 November 2017, https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/10-times-trump-attacked-china-trade-relations-us/story?id=46572567.
-
Sutter, Robert G. “Domestic American influences on US-China Relations.” In Tangled Titans: The United States and China. David L. Shambaugh, Ed., 103–24. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2013.
-
Sutter, Robert G. US-China Relations: Perilous Past, Uncertain Present. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.
-
Swanson, Anna and Natalie Kitroeff. “‘Army’ of Lobbyists Hits Capitol Hill to Defend nafta.” New York Times, 24 October 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/24/us/politics/nafta-lobby-congress.html.
-
Szechenyi, Nicholas, Ed. China’s Maritime Silk Road: Strategic and Economic Implications for the Indo-Pacific Region. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2018).
-
The US-China Business Council. “2019 State Export Report: Goods and Services Exports by US States to China Over the Past Decade.” Washington, DC: US-China Business Council, July 2019.
-
“Trump Targets China Trade, Says Plans Serious Measures.” Reuters, 24 August 2016, https://fr.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-china-idUSKCN10Z2JN.
-
U.S. Election Atlas. “1996 Presidential Republican Primary Election Results,” 2019, https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?f=0&year=1996&elect=2.
-
US-China Economic and Security Review Commission. About Us, (n.d.) https://www.uscc.gov/about-us.
-
Villareal, M. Angeles and Ian F. Fergusson. The North American Free Trade Agreement (nafta). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2017.
-
Vote Smart Facts Matter,. “hr4444-U.S.-China Relations Act of 2000-National Key Vote,” https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bill/3035/10273/23812/bill-clinton-signed-hr-4444-us-china-relations-act-of-2000 (accessed 24 April 2023).
-
Vote Smart. hr 4444-U.S.-China Relations Act of 2000-National Key Vote, n.d., https://justfacts.votesmart.org/bill/3035/10273/23812/bill-clinton-signed-hr-4444-us-china-relations-act-of-2000.
-
Weaver, Kent. “Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders: Negative Feedback and Policy Regime Change.” Journal of Public Policy 30, No. 2 (December 2010): 137–62.
-
Welch, David A. Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
-
Wolf, Jim. “Biden Doubles Down on Trump’s Moves to Confront a Rising China.” News Decoder, 20 July 2021, https://news-decoder.com/biden-doubles-down-on-trumps-moves-to-confront-a-rising-china/.
-
Xie, Tao. “Congressional Roll Call Voting on China Trade Policy.” American Politics Research 34, No. 6 (2006): 732–58.
-
Yang, Yongzheng. “China’s wto Accession: The Economics and Politics.” Journal of World Trade 34, No. 4 (2000a): 77–94.
-
Yang, Yongzheng. China’s wto Accession: Why Has it Taken so Long? Canberra: Asia Pacific Press at the Australian National University, 2000b.
The U.S.-China Trade War and Policy Resilience
In: Journal of American-East Asian RelationsSearch for other papers by Edward Ashbee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven Hurst in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
One can attribute the Trump administration’s pursuit of a trade war against the People’s Republic of China (prc) to a range of variables, including its re-election hopes, commitment to protectionism as an economic weapon, fears about Beijing’s pursuit of artificial intelligence, and broader strategic concerns about the global balance of power. This article argues that another explanation for President Donald J. Trump’s ability to change trade policy towards China was the structural weaknesses of the trade policy regime that emerged at the end of the 1990s when Congress adopted Permanent Normal Trade Relations as a designation for free trade in July 1998 and the prc joined the World Trade Organization in December 2001. Those weaknesses owed much to the ways in which the United States initially framed the new trade regime with the prc and the limited, only partially conclusive, character of the debate that took place at the time. Despite the growth and embedding of supply chains between China and the United States, these inbuilt weaknesses contributed to the progressive erosion of the trade policy regime during the years that followed. Within this context, few constituencies were ready to lobby for the prc after January 2017 and the Trump administration faced little opposition to its change of trade policy.
