Phineas, Son of Eleazar, in Pseudo-Philo’s Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum
In: Journal of Ancient JudaismSearch for other papers by Fabrizio Marcello in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In contrast to the biblical tradition, the figure of Phineas saw considerable development in Second Temple traditions. Numerous studies have appeared recently, yet the Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum, which shows awareness of such traditions and reworks them creatively, has been overlooked by scholars. The present contribution aims to investigate the significant testimony of Pseudo-Philo, who constructs a complex and versatile character in his rewriting of biblical history – one who is responsible for the purity of worship against any idolatrous drift and who is the guardian of the Law and its understanding. Moreover, Phineas occupies a central position in the eschatological scenario, since he will be taken up to heaven like Elijah until his return in the last days, when, after his death, he will participate in the divine judgment.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adelman, Rachel. The Return of the Repressed: Pirqe de-Rabbi Eliezer and the Pseudepigrapha. JSJSup 140. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
-
Allegro, John M. “Further Messianic References in Qumran Literature.” JBL 75 (1956): 174–87.
-
Allison, Dale C., Jr. 4Baruch. Paraleipomena Jeremiou. CEJL 22. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019.
-
Angel, Joseph L. “The Traditional Roots of Priestly Messianism at Qumran.” Pages 27–54 in The Dead Sea Scrolls at 60: Scholarly Contributions of New York University Faculty and Alumni. Edited by Lawrence Schiffman and Shani Tzoref. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
-
Angel, Joseph L. “The Liturgical-Eschatological Priest of the Self-Glorification Hymn.” RevQ 24 (2010): 585–605.
-
Aus, Richard D. “Gericht Gottes II. Judentum.” TRE 12:466–67.
-
Baruchi-Unna, Amitai. “The Story of the Zeal of Phinehas and Congregational Weeping at Bethel.” VT 65 (2015): 505–15.
-
Bauckham, Robert. “The Martyrdom of Enoch and Elijah: Jewish or Christian?” JBL 95 (1976): 447–58.
-
Baumgarten, Joseph M. “Messianic Forgiveness of Sin in CD 14:19.” Pages 537–44 in The Provo International Conference on the Dead Sea Scrolls: Technological Innovations, New Texts, & Reformulated Issues. Edited by Donald W. Parry and Eugene Ulrich. STDJ 30. Leiden: Brill, 1999.
-
Begg, Christopher. “The Golden Calf Episode According to Pseudo-Philo.” Pages 577–94 in Studies in the Book of Exodus. Edited by Marc Vervenne. BETL 126. Leuven: Peeters, 1996.
-
Begg, Christopher. “Angels in Pseudo-Philo.” Pages 537–53 in Angels: The Concept of Celestial Beings: Origins, Development and Reception. Edited by Friedrich V. Reiterer, Tobias Nicklas, Karin Schöpfin. DCLY 2007. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007.
-
Bernat, David. “Josephus’s Protrayal of Phinehas.” JSP 13 (2002): 137–49.
-
Blenkinsopp, Joseph. “The Baal Peor Episode Revisited (Num 25,1–18).” Bib 93 (2012): 86–97.
-
Briggs, Richard S. “The Zeal of Readers in Defence and in Dissent: Phinehas’ Spear, the Covenant of Peace, and the Politics of Hermeneutics.” Pages 137–63 in The Temple in Text and Tradition: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert Hayward. Edited by R. Timothy McLay. London: T&T Clark, 2015.
-
Chang, Dongshin D. Phinehas, the Sons of Zadok, and Melchizedek: Priestly Covenant in Late Second Temple Texts. LSTS 90. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.
-
Chialà, Sabino. Il libro delle parabole di Enoc: testo e commentario. SB 117. Brescia: Paideia, 1997.
-
Cohen, Shaye J.D. “Were Pharisees and Rabbis the Leaders of Communal Prayer and Torah Study in Antiquity.” Pages 89–105 in Evolution of the Synagogue: Problems and Progress. Edited by Howard C. Kee and Lynn H. Cohick. Harrisburg: Trinity Press, 1999.
-
Collins, John J. The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.
-
Collins, John J. The Scepter and the Star: Messianism in the Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2010.
-
Collins, Marilyn F. “The Hidden Vessels in Samaritan Traditions.” JSJ 3 (1972): 97–116.
-
de Jonge, Marinus. “Levi in Aramaic Levi and in the Testament of Levi.” Pages 81–89 in Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: The Apocrypha & Pseudepigrapha in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Proceedings of the International Symposium of the Orion Center, 12–14 January 1997. Edited by Esther G. Chazon, Michael E. Stone, and Avital Pinnick. STDJ 31. Leiden: Brill, 1999.
-
Endres, John C. “Leaders without Blemish: Pseudo-Philo’s Retelling of the Biblical Golden Calf Story.” Pages 97–109 in Golden Calf Traditions in Early Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Edited by Eric F. Mason and Edmondo Lupieri. TBN 23. Leiden: Brill, 2019.
-
Engler, Erich. Reward and Punishment in Pseudo-Philo’s Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum. PhD diss., McMaster University, 2012.
-
Faierstein, Morris M. “Why Do the Scribes Say That Elijah Must Come First.” JBL 100 (1981): 75–86.
-
Feldman, Louis H. “The Portrayal of Phinehas by Philo, Pseudo-Philo, and Josephus.” JSQ 92 (2002): 315–45.
-
Fisk, Robert. “Scripture Shaping Scripture: The Interpretive Role of Biblical Citations in Pseudo-Philo’s Episode of the Golden Calf,” JSPE 17 (1998): 3–23.
-
Fletcher-Louis, Caspar H.T. “Humanity and the Idols of the Gods in Pseudo-Philo’s Biblical Antiquities.” Pages 58–72 in Idolatry: False Worship in the Bible, Early Judaism and Christianity. Edited by Stephen Barton. London: T&T Clark, 2007.
-
Fleurant, Josbert. “Phinehas Murdered Moses’ Wife: An Analysis of Numbers 25.” JSOT 35 (2011): 285–94.
-
García Martinez, Florentino, and Julio Trebolle Barrera. Gli uomini di Qumran. SB 113. Paideia: Brescia, 1996.
-
Giambrone, Anthony. “‘Why Do the Scribes Say?’ (Mark 9:11): Scribal Expectations of an Eschatological High Priest and the Interpretation of Jesus’ Transfiguration.” RB 128 (2021): 201–35.
-
Ginzberg, Louis. Legends of the Jews. 2 vols. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 2003.
-
Goldstein, Jonathan A. The Maccabees: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AB 41. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1974.
-
Grey, Matthew J. “Priests, Judean Community Assemblies, and Synagogue Development in the Second Temple Period.” Pages 97–131 in The Synagogue in Ancient Palestine: Current Issues and Emerging Trends. Edited by Rick Bonnie, Raimo Hakola, and Ulla Tervahauta. FRLANT 279. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2021.
-
Greenfield, Jonas C., Michael E. Stone, and Ester Eshel, eds. The Aramaic Levi Document: Edition, Translation, Commentary. SVTP 19. Leiden: Brill, 2004.
-
Harrington, Daniel J. et al. Les Antiquités Bibliques. 2 vols. SC 229–30. Paris: Cerf, 1976.
-
Harrington, Daniel J. “Afterlife Expectations in Pseudo-Philo, 4Ezra, and 2Baruch, and Their Implications for the New Testament.” Pages 21–34 in Resurrection in the New Testament: Festschrift J. Lambrecht. Edited by Reimund Bieringer, Veronica Koperski, and Bianca Lataire. BETL 165. Leuven: Peeters, 2002.
-
Hayward, Robert. “Phinehas – the Same Is Elijah: The Origins of a Rabbinic Tradition.” JJS 29 (1978): 22–34.
-
Hayward, Robert. “Pseudo-Philo and the Priestly Oracle.” JJS 46 (1995): 43–54.
-
Hengel, Martin. Die Zeloten. AGAJU 1. Leiden: Brill, 1976.
-
Himmelfarb, Martha. “Levi, Phinehas, and the Problem of Intermarriage at the Time of the Maccabean Revolt.” JSQ 6 (1999): 1–24.
-
Hogeterp, Albert. Expectations of the End. STDJ 83. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
-
Hollander, Harm W., and Marinus de Jonge. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: A Commentary. SVTP 8. Leiden: Brill, 1985.
-
Houtman, Cornelius. “The Urim and Thummim: A New Suggestion.” VT 40 (1990): 229–32.
-
Jackson, Henry M. “Echoes and Demons in the Pseudo-Philonic ‘Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum.’” JSJ 27 (1996): 1–20.
-
Jacobson, Howard. A Commentary on Pseudo-Philo’s Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum. 2 vols. AGAJU 31. Leiden: Brill, 1996.
-
Jacobson, Howard. “Samuel’s Vision in Pseudo-Philo’s Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum.” JBL 112 (1993): 310–11.
-
Jassen, Alex P. “Re-reading 4QPesher Isaiah A (4Q161): Forty Years after DJD V.” Pages 57–90 in The Mermaid and the Partridge: Essays from the Copenhagen Conference on Revising Texts from Cave Four. Edited by George J. Brooke and Jesper Høgenhaven. STDJ 96. Leiden: Brill, 2011.
-
Jonge, Marinus de, and Johannes Tromp. “Jacob’s Son Levi in the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha and Related Literature.” Pages 203–36 in Biblical Figures Outside the Bible. Edited by Michael E. Stone and Theodore A. Bergren. Trinity Press: Harrisburg, 1998.
-
Kalimi, Isaac and James D. Purvis. “The Hiding of the Temple Vessels in Jewish and Samaritan Literature.” CBQ 56 (1994): 679–85.
-
Kirk, J.R. Daniel. A Man Attested by God: The Human Jesus of the Synoptic Gospel. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2016.
-
Kugel, James. L. “Levi’s Elevation to the Priesthood in Second Temple Writings.” HTR 86 (1993): 1–64.
-
Kugel, James. L. The Bible as It Was. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2001.
-
Kugler, Robert. From Patriarch to Priest: The Priestly Tradition from Aramaic Levi to Testament of Levi. EJL 9. Atlanta: Scholar Press, 1996.
-
Lanier, Gregory R. Corpus Christologicum: Texts and Translations for the Study of Jewish Messianism and Early Christology. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2021.
-
Levinson, John R. “Torah and Covenant in Pseudo-Philo’s Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum.” Pages 111–27 in Bund und Tora: Zur theologischen Begriffsgeschichte in alttestamentlicher, frühjüdischer und urchristlicher Tradition. Edited by Frederich Avemarie and Hermann Lichtenberger. WUNT 92. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1996.
-
Marcello, Fabrizio. “Demonstratio et Veritas. Priestly Oracles in Pseudo-Philo’s Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum.” JSP 33 (2024): 217–33.
-
Marttila, Marko. “The Figure of Phinehas from Different Perspectives.” JAJ 5 (2014): 2–24.
-
Mason, Eric F. ‘You Are a Priest Forever’: Second Temple Jewish Messianism and the Priestly Christology of the Epistle to the Hebrews. STDJ 74. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
-
Miller, Yonatan S. “Phinehas’ Priestly Zeal and the Violence of Contested Identities.” JSQ 26 (2019): 117–45.
-
Mortensen, Beverly P. The Priesthood in Targum Pseudo-Jonathan: Renewing the Profession. SAIS 4. Leiden: Brill, 2022.
-
Murphy, Frederick J. “The Eternal Covenant in Pseudo-Philo.” JSP 3 (1988): 43–57.
-
Murphy, Frederick J. “Retelling the Bible: Idolatry in Pseudo-Philo.” JBL 2 (1988): 275–87.
-
Murphy, Frederick J. Pseudo-Philo: Rewriting the Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
-
Nelson, Richard D. Joshua: A Commentary. OTL. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1997.
-
Nickelsburg, George W.E., and James C. VanderKam. 1Enoch 2. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2012.
-
Organ, Barbara E. “Pursuing Phinehas: A Synchronic Reading.” CBQ 63 (2001): 203–18.
-
Ortlund, Dane C. “Phinehan Zeal: A Consideration of James Dunn’s Proposal.” JSP 20 (2011): 299–315.
-
Poirier, John C. “The Endtime Return of Elijah and Moses at Qumran.” DSD 10 (2003): 221–42.
-
Pomykala, Kenneth E. “The Covenant with Phinehas in Ben Sira (Sirach 45:23–26; 50:22–24).” Pages 17–36 in Israel in the Wilderness: Interpretations of the Biblical Traditions in Jewish and Christian Narratives. Edited by Kenneth E. Pomykala. TBN 10. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
-
Puech, Émile. “La préséance du messie prêtre en 1QSa II 11–22.” RevQ 30 (2018): 85–89.
-
Regev, Eyal. “The Two Sins of Nob: Biblical Interpretation, an Anti-Priestly Controversy and a Geographical Error in Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum.” JSP 12 (2001): 85–104.
-
Reinmuth, Eckart. “Zwischen Investitur und Testament. Beobachtungen zur Rezeption des Josuabuches im Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum.” SJOT 16 (2002): 24–43.
-
Roi, Micha. “Phinehas Is not Elijah: the Zeal at Shittim (Num 25:6–15) in Light of the Zeal at Horeb (1Kgs 19), and the Altar at Gilgal (Josh 22:9–34) in Light of the Altar at Mount Carmel (1Kgs 18).” RB 127 (2020): 481–503.
-
Ron, Zvi. “Who Was Jabez?” JBQ 49 (2021): 50–54.
-
Schreiber, Stefan. Gesalbter und König: Titel und Konzeptionen der königlichen Gesalbtenerwartung in früjüdischen und urchristlichen Schriften. BZW 105. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2000.
-
Schwemer, Anna Maria. Studien zu den frühjüdischen Prophetenlegenden Vitae Prophetarum. 2 vols. TSAJ 49–50. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1995.
-
Sharp, Carloyn J. “Phinehan Zeal and Rhetorical Strategy in ‘4QMMT.’” RevQ 18 (1997): 207–22.
-
Spiro, Abram. “The Ascension of Phinhas.” PAAJR 22 (1953): 94–95.
-
Stuckenbruck, Loren T. “Melechizedek in Jewish Apocalyptic Literature.” JSNT 41 (2018): 124–38.
-
Stettler, Christian. Das letzte Gericht: Studien zur Endgerichtserwartung von den Schriftpropheten bis Jesus. WUNT 2.299. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011.
-
Teeple, Howard M. The Mosaic Eschatological Prophet. JBLMS 10. Philadelphia: SBL Press, 1957.
-
Thon, Johannes. Pinhas ben Elasar – der levitische Priester am Ende der Tora. ABG 20. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlangsanstalt, 2006.
-
Vallançon, Henri. Le développement des traditions sur Élie et l’histoire de la formation de la Bible. EB 80. Leuven: Peeters, 2019.
-
VanderKam, James C. “Joshua the High Priest and the Interpretation of Zechariah 3.” CBQ 93 (1991): 553–70.
-
VanderKam, James C. From Joshua to Caiaphas: High Priests after the Exile. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2004.
-
VanderKam, James C. Jubilees 22–50. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2018.
-
Vette, Nathanael. “Kenaz: A Figure Created out of Scriptures?” JSP 29 (2020): 245–59.
-
Xeravits, Géza G. King, Priest, Prophet: Positive Eschatological Protagonists of the Qumran Library. STDJ 47. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
-
Zeron, Alexander. “The Martyrdom of Phineas–Elijah.” JBL 98 (1979): 99–100.
-
Zimmermann, Johannes. Messianische Texte aus Qumran. WUNT 2.104. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1998.
-
Zwiep, Arie W. The Ascension of the Messiah in Lukan Christology. NTSup 87. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
-
Zwiep, Arie W. “Assumptus est in caelum. Rapture and Heavenly Exaltation in Early Judaism and Luke-Acts.” Pages 323–49 in Auferstehung – Resurrection. Edited by Frederich Avemarie and Hermann Lichtenberger. WUNT 135. Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen, 2001.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 45 | 45 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 7 | 4 |
Phineas, Son of Eleazar, in Pseudo-Philo’s Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum
In: Journal of Ancient JudaismSearch for other papers by Fabrizio Marcello in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In contrast to the biblical tradition, the figure of Phineas saw considerable development in Second Temple traditions. Numerous studies have appeared recently, yet the Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum, which shows awareness of such traditions and reworks them creatively, has been overlooked by scholars. The present contribution aims to investigate the significant testimony of Pseudo-Philo, who constructs a complex and versatile character in his rewriting of biblical history – one who is responsible for the purity of worship against any idolatrous drift and who is the guardian of the Law and its understanding. Moreover, Phineas occupies a central position in the eschatological scenario, since he will be taken up to heaven like Elijah until his return in the last days, when, after his death, he will participate in the divine judgment.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 45 | 45 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 7 | 7 | 4 |