The Historical Roots behind the Libyan State Failure
In: Contemporary Arab AffairsSearch for other papers by Ali Bin Musa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper discusses the phenomenon of state failure in general and uses the current Libyan state as a case study by tracing the historical path of the formation of the modern Libyan state, specifically the impact of the legacy left by the Gaddafi regime on three main variables: authority, legitimacy, and institutional capacity. It addresses the following question: How did the historical legacy of the Gaddafi regime contribute to the crisis of the Libyan state after 2011? The study is based on the hypothesis that personal authoritarian regimes, such as Gaddafi’s, have the most detrimental impact on institutions in relation to the monopoly of violence, legitimacy, and capacity. This is because the ruling elites in personalistic authoritarian regimes are often unable to restrain the decisions and actions of the head of the regime, who often seeks to dismantle institutions that could limit their power. This contrasts with other types of authoritarian regimes (monarchy, military, one-party) that may, to some extent, maintain institutional rules for governance and the transfer of power.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ahmida, Ali Abdullatif. 2012a. “Libya, Social Origins of Dictatorship, and the Challenge for Democracy.” The Journal of the Middle East and Africa 3 (1): 70–81.
-
Ahmida, Ali Abdullatif. 2012b. (Arabic) “Dawlat ma baʾda al-istiʾmar wl-tahawolat al-ijtimaiʾya fi Libya” [The Post-colonial State and Social Transformations in Libya] Tabayyan 1 (1): pp. 165–180.
-
Ahmida, Ali Abdullatif. 2009 (Arabic) Al-aswat al-Muhamasha: Al-khuduʾ wl- ʿOsyan fi Libya athnaʿa al-istiʾmar wa-baʾdah [Marginalized Voices: Submission and Disobedience in Libya During and after Colonialism]. Beirut: Center for Arab Unity Studies.
-
Aman, Shahida and Aman, Shagufta. 2015. “Understanding Failed States and State Failure: Discourses and Limitations.” Pakistan Horizon (April) 68 (2): 95–118.
-
Anderson, Lisa. 2004. “Antiquated before They Can Ossify: States that Fail before they Form.” Journal of International Affairs Fall 58 (1): pp. 1–16.
-
Call, Charles. 2008. “The Fallacy of the Failed State”. Third World Quarterly 29 (8): pp. 1491–1507.
-
Capasso, Matteo. 2013. “Understanding Libya’s Revolution through Transformation of the Jamahiriyya into a State of Exception.” Middle East Critique 22 (2): pp. 115–128.
-
Christensen, Jason. 2017. “Dimensions of State Fragility: Determinants of Violent Group Grievance, Political Legitimacy, and Economic Capacity.” PhD Thesis, Central Florida University, Florida. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/CFE0006728
-
Cordesman, Anthony. 2020. The Greater Middle East: From the Arab Spring to the Axis of Failed States. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).
-
Dannreuther, Roland. 2007. “War and Insecurity: Legacies of Northern and Southern State Formation.” Review of International Studies (April) 33 (2): pp. 307–326.
-
Eriksen, Stein. 2011. “State Failure in Theory and Practice: The Idea of the State and the Contradictions of State Formation.” Review of International Studies (January) 37 (1): pp. 229–247
-
Ezrow, Natasha and Erica Frantz. 2013. “Revisiting the Concept of the Failed State: Bringing the State Back in.” Third World Quarterly 34 (8): pp. 1323–1338.
-
Geddes, Barbara, Joseph Wright, and Erica Frantz. 2014. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set.” Perspectives on Politics. (June)12 (2): pp. 313–331.
-
Ghomari, Taibi. 2019. (Arabic) “Aljundi wl-dawla wl-thawrat al-arabiyah” (English) [The Soldier, the State, and the Arab Revolutions] Doha: Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies.
-
Jackson, Robert. 1998. “Surrogate Sovereignty? Great Power Responsibility and Failed States.” Working Paper, (November) no. 25, Institute of International Relations, The University of British Colombia.
-
Krasner, Stephen. 2004. “Sharing Sovereignty: New Institutions for Collapsed and Failing States.” International Security (Fall) 29 (2). 85–120.
-
Lizak, Wiesław. 2018. “Libya: Road to Dysfunctionality.” Politeja 15 (5): pp. 23–40.
-
Ogburn, Langdon. 2021. “Libya: State Fragility 10 Years After Intervention.” (2 November) The Fund for Peace. https://rebrand.ly/yktezo5 .
-
Osaghae, Eghosa. 2007. “Fragile States.” Development in Practice. (August) 17 (4–5): pp. 691–699.
-
Paoletti, Emanuela. 2011. “Libya: Roots of a Civil Conflicts.” Mediterranean Politics 16 (2): pp. 313–319.
-
Pargeter, Alison. 2012. Libya the Rise and Fail of Qaddafi. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
-
Rotberg, Robert. 2002. “The New Nature of Nature-state Failure.” The Washington Quarterly (Summer)25 (3): 85–96.
-
Smits, Rosan [et al.]. 2013. “Revolution and Its Discontents: State, Factions and Violence in the New Libya.” (The Hague: Clingendael Institute). https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/2016-02/Libya%20-%20Revolution%20and%20its%20discontents.pdf
-
St. John, Ronald Bruce. 2012. Libya from Colony to Revolution. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
-
The White House. 2002. “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America.” (Washington, DC: The White House, September), https://rebrand.ly/1a9e3a .
-
United Nations Human Development Programme [UNDP]. Human Development Report 2010: The Real Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development. 20th Anniversary ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
-
Vandewalle, Dirk. 2012. A History of Modern Libya, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
-
Zartman, William. 1995. Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 194 | 194 | 130 |
| Full Text Views | 11 | 11 | 10 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 22 | 22 | 19 |
The Historical Roots behind the Libyan State Failure
In: Contemporary Arab AffairsSearch for other papers by Ali Bin Musa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This paper discusses the phenomenon of state failure in general and uses the current Libyan state as a case study by tracing the historical path of the formation of the modern Libyan state, specifically the impact of the legacy left by the Gaddafi regime on three main variables: authority, legitimacy, and institutional capacity. It addresses the following question: How did the historical legacy of the Gaddafi regime contribute to the crisis of the Libyan state after 2011? The study is based on the hypothesis that personal authoritarian regimes, such as Gaddafi’s, have the most detrimental impact on institutions in relation to the monopoly of violence, legitimacy, and capacity. This is because the ruling elites in personalistic authoritarian regimes are often unable to restrain the decisions and actions of the head of the regime, who often seeks to dismantle institutions that could limit their power. This contrasts with other types of authoritarian regimes (monarchy, military, one-party) that may, to some extent, maintain institutional rules for governance and the transfer of power.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 194 | 194 | 130 |
| Full Text Views | 11 | 11 | 10 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 22 | 22 | 19 |