The problematics of social and academic participation for gender diverse and lgbtqi+ youth in school communities is highlighted by the stigmatising relational dynamics which often become the dominant narrative in educational domains. This paper discusses the creation of a critical literacy/media product which arose from a year 7 level curriculum project in which students were invited to seek solutions to address a problem about which they cared. In 2021 a group of Australian secondary school students undertook an investigation into gender diversity and lgbtqi+ inclusion. In partnership with teachers and pre-service teachers they co-designed an animation on gender identity opening up wider discussion of ‘orientations and dispositions’ and generating critique around issues of social justice, democracy, equality and inclusion in and out of the classroom.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Andreotti, Vanessa (2007). An Ethical Engagement with the Other: Spivak’s ideas on Education. Critical Literacy: Theories and Practices, 1 (1): 69–79.
Aristotle (1959). “Aristotle, with an English Translation: The “Art” of Rhetoric” (Trans) John Henry Freese. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Heinemann. Safeschoolcoalition.org.au link citation –Use this link http://www.safeschoolscoalition.org/.
Blackmore, Jill, Bateman, Debra, Cloonam Anne, Dixon, Mary, Loughlin, Jill, O’Mara, Jo, & Senior, Kim (2011). Innovative learning environments research study. Victoria: Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
Brennan, Marie, & Zipin, Lew (2018). Curriculum for All? Exploring Potentials for (In)justice in the Australian Curriculum. In Reid, Alan, & Price, Deborah (Eds), Australian Curriculum: Promises, problems and possibilities, pp. 179–187. Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
Britzman, D. P. (1995). ‘Is There a Queer Pedagogy? Or Stop Reading Straight’ Educational Theory 45, pp. 151–165.
Britzman, Deborah P (1997). ‘What is this thing called love?: New discourses for understanding gay and lesbian youth’. In de Castell, Susan, & Bryson, Mary (Eds), Radical in<ter>ventions: Identity, Politics, and Difference/s in Educational Praxis. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Chonody, Jill M., Mattiske, Josh, Godinez, Kristina, Webb, Steph, & Jensen, Jess (2020). How did the postal vote impact Australian lgbtq+ residents?: Exploring well-being and messaging. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services. 32(1): 49–66. doi: 10.1080/10538720.2019.1683113.
Creutz-Kämppi, Karin (2008). ‘The othering of Islam in a European context: polarizing discourses in Swedish-language dailies in Finland’. Nordicom Review, 29(2): 295–308. doi: 10.1515/nor-2017-0192.
De Beauvoir, Simone (2010). The second sex (Borde, Constance, & Malovany-Chevallier, Shelia, Trans.). New York: Knopf.
Ecker, Saan, Rostosky, Sharon S., Riggle, Ellen D., Riley, Elizabeth Anne, & Byrnes, Joanne M. (2019). The Australian marriage equality debate: A qualitative analysis of the self-reported lived experience of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, and queer (lgbtq+Q) people. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 8(4): 212–226. doi: 10.1037/ipp0000116.
Djenontin, Ida Nadia S., & Meadow Alison M. (2018). The art of coproduction of knowledge in environmental sciences and management: Lessons from international practice. Environmental Management, 61: 885–903. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1028-3.
Epstein, Debbie, & Johnson, Richard (1998). Schooling sexualities. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fenwick, Tara, & Edwards, Richard (2013). Performative ontologies: Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4(1): 49–63. doi: 10.3384/rela.2000–7426.rela0104.
Ferfolja, Tania (2007). Schooling cultures: Institutionalizing heteronormativity and heterosexism. International journal of inclusive education, 11(2): 147–162. doi: 10.1080/13603110500296596.
Freire, Paulo. (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Freire, Paulo. (1998). Teachers as Cultural Workers: Letters to Those Who Dare to Teach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Foster, Ally (2022, Feburary 5) Citipoint Christian College principle steps down over anti-gay contract. News.com.au. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/school-life/citipointeChristiancollege-principal-steps-down-over-antigay-contract/newsstory/19dc52f3c9c0cb99eef927f724b8638f.
Fuss, Diana (1991). Inside/out. In Fuss, Diana (Ed.), Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories, pp. 1–10. New York: Routledge.
França, João, & Giroux, Henry (2019, 02 July). Henry Giroux: ‘Those arguing that education should be neutral are really arguing for a version of education in which nobody is accountable’: An interview with founder of critical pedagogy Henry Giroux on the meaning of education, suspicions regarding neutrality and on how uncertainties could be be a driving force to rethink and generate new possibilities. CCCBLab. https://lab.cccb.org/en/henry-giroux-those-arguing-that-education-should-be-neutral-are-really-arguing-for-a-version-of-education-in-which-nobody-is-accountable/.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2015). Sharing as rescripting: Place manipulations on YouTube between narrative and social media affordances. Discourse, Context & Media, 9: 64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2015.07.002.
Haraway, Donna (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3): 575–599. doi: 10.2307/3178066.
Hayes, Sarah (2021). Postdigital Positionality: developing powerful inclusive narratives for learning, teaching, research and policy in Higher Education. Rotterdam: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004466029.
Jarvis, Kate, & Sandretto, Susan (2010). ‘The power of discursive practices: queering or heteronormalising?’ New Zealand Research in Early Childhood Education, 13: 43–56.
Jorgensen, Estelle R. (2003). Transforming music education. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kanellopoulos, Panagiotis A., Wright, Ruth, Stefanou, Danae & Lang, Jennifer (2016). Pictures of ignorant freedom: music improvisation and informal pedagogy. In Wright, Ruth, Younker, Betty Anne, & Benyon, Carol (Eds), 21st century music education: Informal learning and non-formal teaching approaches in school and community contexts. Waterloo, ON: Canadian Music Educators’ Association.
King, Thomas (2003). The truth about stories: A native narrative. Toronto, Canada: House of Anansi Press.
Marston, Kate (2022). Fabricating future bodies: making digital sexualities research matter. Qualitative Research Journal, 22(1): 67–80. doi: 10.1108/QRJ-01-2021-0014.
Meddings, Luke, & Thornbury, Scott (2009). Teaching unplugged. Delta Publishing.
Miller, s. j. (2015). A queer literacy framework promoting (a)gender and (a)sexuality self-determination and justice. English Journal, 104(5): 37–44.
Moll, Luis C., Amanti, Cathy, Neff, Deborah, & González, Norma (1992). Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2): 132–141. doi: 10.1080/00405849209543534.
Muñoz, José Esteban (1999). Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Neal, Greg (2007). Thinking and Learning with Information and Communication Technology (ict): Student Voices. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 3(1): 83–91. doi: 10.18848/1832–3669/CGP/v03i01/55703.
Okri, Ben (1997). A way of being free. London, England: Phoenix House.
Pinar, William F. (2019). What is curriculum theory? (3rd edition). Routledge.
Redman, Sally., Greenhalgh, Trish., Adedokun, Lola., Staniszewska, Sophie., & Denegri, Simon. (2021). Co-production of knowledge, the future: a new collection highlights the role of co-production in strengthening health systems. bmj, 372. Article n434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n434.
Reilly, Mary Ann (2011). Curriculum as complicated conversation. Between the by-road and the main road. http://maryannreilly.blogspot.com/2011/03/curriculum-as-complicated-conversation.html.
Roberts, Tim (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Ideas Group Publishing: Hershey, PA. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59140-408-8.
Schrag, Calvin O. (1986). Communicative Praxis and the Space of Subjectivity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai (2001). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books Ltd.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (1998). Can the Subaltern Speak?. In Nelson, Cary, & Grossberg, Lawrence (Eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, pp. 271–313. Basingstoke: Macmillian Publishers.
Taylor, Simon, Zipin, Lew, & Brennan, Marie (2020). Students Researching ‘Problems That Matter’ in Their Communities. forum, 62(2): 195–206. doi: 10.15730/forum.2020.62.2.195.
Tilley-Lubbs, Gresilda A. (2021). Autoethnography Crosses Cultural Borders. In Adams, Tony E., Holman Jones, Stacy, & Ellins, Carolyn (Eds), Handbook of Autoethnography, pp. 311–320. New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429431760.
Vasudevan, Lalitha (2011). An Invitation to Unknowing. Teachers College Record, 113(6): 1154–1174.
van Leent, Lisa, & Mills, Kathy (2017). A Queer Critical Media Literacies Framework in a Digital Age. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(4): 401–411. doi: 10.1002/jaal.711.
Vicars, Mark, & Van Toledo, Samara (2021). Walking the Talk: lgbtq Allies in Australian Secondary Schools, Inclusion in Schools Special Issue, Frontiers in Sociology, Gender, Sex and Sexualities, 6: 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.611001.
Waldon, Kalisha, & Schoorman, Dilys (2020). Creating Spaces for Justice Orientated Research, International journal of Critical Pedagogy, 11(1): 7–30.
Zipin, Lew (2020). Building Curriculum Knowledge Work around Community-Based ‘Problems That Matter’: Let’s dare to imagine. Curriculum Perspectives, 40: 111–115. doi: 10.1007/s41297-019-00096-y.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 709 | 338 | 75 |
Full Text Views | 114 | 7 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 85 | 20 | 0 |
The problematics of social and academic participation for gender diverse and lgbtqi+ youth in school communities is highlighted by the stigmatising relational dynamics which often become the dominant narrative in educational domains. This paper discusses the creation of a critical literacy/media product which arose from a year 7 level curriculum project in which students were invited to seek solutions to address a problem about which they cared. In 2021 a group of Australian secondary school students undertook an investigation into gender diversity and lgbtqi+ inclusion. In partnership with teachers and pre-service teachers they co-designed an animation on gender identity opening up wider discussion of ‘orientations and dispositions’ and generating critique around issues of social justice, democracy, equality and inclusion in and out of the classroom.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 709 | 338 | 75 |
Full Text Views | 114 | 7 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 85 | 20 | 0 |