The main goal of this paper is to analyze Nicholas of Cusa’s reading on the dispute of Mystical Theology through Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology of givenness. To do this, first of all, we will address the analyses offered by Jean-Luc Marion on the problem of affectivity. Secondly, we examine Nicholas’ interpretation of Mystical Theology through the aenigma of the eicona dei in De visione dei (1453). Thirdly, we present Jean-Luc Marion’s interpretation of Cusanus eicona dei as an antecedent of his phenomenological conception of Icone as “saturated phenomenon.” Finally, we suggest that Cusanus eicona dei appears in Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology as a precedent of his strategy when approaching the field of affectivity. Both authors try to show an instance preceding the distinction between affectivity and rationality.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Cabrera, Cecilia & Szeftel, Micaela, eds. Fenomenología de la vida afectiva (Buenos Aires: SB, 2021).
Marion, Jean-Luc. Certitudes négatives (Paris: Bernard Grasset, 2010).
Marion, Jean-Luc. D’ ailleurs, la révélation (Paris: Grasset, 2021).
Marion, Jean-Luc. Dieu sans l’ être (Paris: Fayard, 1982).
Marion, Jean-Luc. De surcroît. Études sur les phénomènes saturés (Paris: PUF, 2001).
Marion, Jean-Luc. Étant donné, Essai d’ une phénoménologie de la donation (Paris: PUF, 2013).
Marion, Jean-Luc. Le phénomène érotique. “Six méditations sur l’ amour” (Paris: Grasset & Fasquelle, 2003).
Marion, Jean-Luc. Le visible et le révélé (Paris: Cerf, 2005).
Marion, Jean-Luc. L’ idole et la distance (París: Grasset & Fasquelle, 2013).
Marion, Jean-Luc. Prolégomènes à la charité (Paris: La Différence, 1986).
Marion, Jean-Luc. “Seeing, or Seeing Oneself Seen: Nicholas of Cusa’s Contribution in De visione Dei,” trans. Stephen E. Lewis. Journal of Religion 96 (2016), 305–331.
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Erotic Phenomenon. Trans. Stephen E. Lewis (Chicago: University Press of Chicago, 2007).
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Visible and the Revealed. Trans. Christina Gschwandtner (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008).
Nicolai de Cusa. De beryl.: De beryllo, h XI/1, eds. J.G. Senger et C. Bormann (Hamburgi: Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis 1988).
Nicolai de Cusa. De doc. Ig.: De docta ignorantia, h I, eds. R. Klibansky et E. Hoffmann (Lipsiae: Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis, 1932).
Nicolai de Cusa. De ludo.: Dialogus de ludo globi, h IX, ed. J.G. Senger (Hamburgi: Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis, 1998).
Nicolai de Cusa. De poss.: De possest, h XI/2, ed. R. Steiger (Hamburgi: Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis, 1973).
Nicolai de Cusa. De vis. dei.: De visione dei, h VI, ed. A.D. Riemann (Hamburgi: Academiae Litterarum Heidelbergensis, 2000).
Nicholas of Cusa. “The Vision of God.” In Nicholas of Cusa’s Dialectical Mysticism. Trans. Jasper Hopkins (Minnesota: Arthur J. Banning Press, 1988).
Nicholas of Cusa. “On Learned Ignorance: Book I.” In Nicholas of Cusa’s Dialectical Mysticism. Trans. Jasper Hopkins, (Minnesota, Arthur J. Banning Press, 1990).
Pizzi, Matías. “La controversia Falque-Marion sobre el eicona dei cusano: ¿Una insospechada concordantia philosophorum?” Escritos de Filosofía 6 (2019), 106–124.
Pizzi, Matías. “Alcanzar a Dios sin Dios. La relación entre fenomenología y teología en Edmund Husserl y Jean-Luc Marion.” Areté: Revista de Filosofía 3 (2) (2020), 417–441.
Pizzi, Matías. “La certeza negativa a la luz del vocablo cusano possest: aportes para un lenguaje de la saturación.” In El fenómeno saturado. La excedencia de la donación en la fenomenología de Jean-Luc Marion, ed. Jorge Luis Roggero (Buenos Aires: SB, 2020), 191–200.
Ríos, González and Pizzi, Matías. “Certitudes négatives y docta ignorantia: la presencia de la máxima doctrina de la ignorancia de Nicolás de Cusa en la fenomenología de la donación de Jean-Luc Marion.” Daimon: Revista internacional de Filosofía (in press). https://revistas.um.es/daimon/avance.
Roggero, Jorge Luis, ed. El fenómeno saturado. La excedencia de la donación en la fenomenología de Jean-Luc Marion (Buenos Aires: SB, 2020).
Roggero, Jorge Luis, ed. Jean-Luc Marion: límites y posibilidades de la filosofía y de la teología (Buenos Aires: SB, 2017).
Roggero, Jorge Luis. “Problemas de la articulación entre fenomenología y hermenéutica en la obra de J.-L. Marion, en diálogo con la propuesta de C. Romano.” Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica 53 (2020), 327–343.
Vasteenberghe, Edmond. Autour de la docte ignorance. Une controverse sur la théologie mystique aun XVe siècle (Münster: Aschendorff, 1915).
Vinolo, Stéphane. Jean-Luc Marion, apologie de l’ inexistence, tome II: Une phénoménologie discursive (Paris: L’ Harmattan, 2019).
Walton, Roberto, “El fenómeno erótico en el marco de la fenomenología y teología del amor.” In Jean-Luc Marion: límites y posibilidades de la filosofía y de la teología, ed. Jorge Luis Roggero (Buenos Aires: SB, 2017), 69–88.
Walton, Roberto, “El tema del amor en los fundadores de la fenomenología.” In Fenomenología de la vida afectiva, eds. Cecilia Cabrera and Micaela Szeftel (Buenos Aires: SB, 2021), 21–41.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 417 | 12 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 77 | 67 | 11 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 108 | 81 | 8 |
The main goal of this paper is to analyze Nicholas of Cusa’s reading on the dispute of Mystical Theology through Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology of givenness. To do this, first of all, we will address the analyses offered by Jean-Luc Marion on the problem of affectivity. Secondly, we examine Nicholas’ interpretation of Mystical Theology through the aenigma of the eicona dei in De visione dei (1453). Thirdly, we present Jean-Luc Marion’s interpretation of Cusanus eicona dei as an antecedent of his phenomenological conception of Icone as “saturated phenomenon.” Finally, we suggest that Cusanus eicona dei appears in Jean-Luc Marion’s phenomenology as a precedent of his strategy when approaching the field of affectivity. Both authors try to show an instance preceding the distinction between affectivity and rationality.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 417 | 12 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 77 | 67 | 11 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 108 | 81 | 8 |