It is common in accounts of the secularization of Western thought to make reference to the name of Nietzsche. Nietzsche is undeniably a critic of religion, but he is equally a critic of the secular. It is for this reason that I propose thinking about Nietzsche’s philosophy as postsecular. This term is one that has evolved over the last couple decades in response to the so-called “return of the religious” in society, social theory, and philosophy and suggests that secularity and religiosity are not antithetical and therefore that we must move beyond the forms of thinking that would regard them as such. First, I focus on his concepts of will to power, interpretation, perspectivism, and history, and sketch how they are all interrelated and how these ground his interpretation of religion. Based on this view, I show, second, that while religion is, for Nietzsche, a historical perspective, it is also, for him, part of the historical genealogy of secularity. This point leads to my final one on the relationship between secularity and religion in Nietzsche’s thought, where I argue that, on his own terms, Nietzsche’s anti-Christianity is a hyper-Christianity, even while rejecting facets of Christianity.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Assam, A. Nietzsche Versus Paul (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015).
Berger, P. The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of Religion (New York and Toronto: Anchor Books, 1967).
Blumenberg, H. The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, trans. R.M. Wallace (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983).
Burkert, W. Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical, trans. J. Raffan (Blackwell Publishing, 1985).
Casanova, J. Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994)
Cavell, Stanley. Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press 2005).
Chadwick, O. The Secularization of the European Mind in the 19thCentury (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1975).
Clark, M. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Cohen, A.A. The Myth of the Judeo-Christian Tradition (Harper & Row, 1969).
Common, T. Nietzsche, as Critic, Philosopher, Poet, and Prophet (New York: E.P. Dutton and Co., 1901).
Deleuze, G. Nietzsche and Philosophy, trans. H. Tomlinson (New York: NY: Columbia University Press, 1983).
Gericke, J. “The Hebrew Bible in Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Religion.” In The Journal forSemitics, 20.2, 2011.
Gillespie, M.A. Nihilism Before Nietzsche (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
Granier, J. “Nietzsche’s Conception of Chaos.” In The New Nietzsche: Contemporary Styles ofInterpretation, ed. D.B. Allison (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977).
Haase, U. “Nietzsche’s Götterdämmerung.” In Nietzsche and the Divine, eds. J. Lippitt and J. Urpeth (Manchester: Clinamen Press, 2000)
Habermas, J. “What is Meant by a ‘Post-Secular Society’? A Discussion on Islam in Europe.” In Europe: The Faltering Project, trans. C. Cronin (Malden: Polity Press, 2009).
Hamburger, M. A Proliferation of Prophets: Essays on German Writers from Nietzsche to Brecht (Manchester, UK: Carcanet Press, 1983).
Heidegger, M. Nietzsche, vol. II, trans. D. Farrell Krell (New York: Harper Collins, 1991).
Heller, O. Prophets of Dissent: Essays on Maeterlinck, Strindberg, Nietzsche, and Tolstoy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1918).
Heschel, A.J. The Prophets [full edition] (New York: Harper and Row, 1962).
Hill, C.E. “Antichrist.” In Eerdman’s Dictionary of the Bible, ed. David Noel Freedman (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Co., 2000).
Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P. Guyer and W.W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Kauffman, W. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist, fourth ed. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1974).
Klossowski, P. “Nietzsche, Polytheism and Parody.” In Bulletin de la Société Américaine dePhilosophie de Langue Français, Vol. 14, No. 2, Fall 2004: 82–119.
Lyotard J-L. and E. Gruber, The Hyphen: Between Judaism and Christianity (Humanity Books, 1999).
Megill, A. Prophets of Extremity: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Foucault, Derrida (University of California Press, 1987).
Mencken, H.L. “The Mailed Fist and Its Prophet.” In The Atlantic, November 1914.
Nagel, T. The View from Nowhere (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).
Nietzsche, F. Beyond Good and Evil, trans. W. Kaufmann (New York: Vintage Books, 1966).
Nietzsche, F. “Attempt at Self-Criticism.” In The Birth of Tragedy and The Case of Wagner, trans. W. Kaufmann (New York: Vintage Books, 1967).
Nietzsche, F. Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, ed. M. Clark and B. Leiter, trans. R.J. Hollingdale (New York: Cambridge UP, 1997).
Nietzsche, F. The Gay Science, trans. W. Kaufmann (New York: Vintage Books, 1974).
Nietzsche, F. On the Advantage and Disadvantage of History for Life, trans. Peter Press (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1980).
Nietzsche, F. On the Genealogy of Morals/Ecce Homo, trans. W. Kaufmann (New York: Vintage Books, 1989).
Nietzsche, F. Twilight of the Idols. In The Portable Nietzsche, ed. and trans. W. Kaufmann (New York: Penguin Books, 1954).
Nietzsche, F. The Will to Power, trans. W. Kaufmann and R.J. Hollingdale (New York: Vintage Books, 1968).
Nietzsche, F. Writings from the Late Notebooks, ed. R. Bittner, trans. K. Sturge (New York: Cambridge UP, 2003).
Overholt, T.W. “Prophet, Prophecy.” In Freedman, Eerdman’s Dictionary of the Bible.
Peddle, D. “Incipit Parodia / Incipit Tragoedia: A Commentary on Part One of Also SprachZarathustra.” In Animus 14 (2010).
Polka, B. Between Philosophy and Religion: Spinoza, the Bible, and Modernity, Vol. I:Hermeneutics and Ontology (Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, 2007).
Porter, J. “Nietzsche’s Theory of the Will to Power.” In A Companion to Nietzsche, ed. K. Ansell-Pearson (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006).
Richardson, J. Nietzsche’s System (New York: Oxford UP, 1996).
Richardson, J. “Nietzsche’s Power Ontology.” In Nietzsche, ed. J. Richardson and B. Leiter (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1996).
Roberts, T.T. Contesting Spirit: Nietzsche, Affirmation, Religion (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1998).
Schacht, R. Nietzsche (London and New York: Routledge, 1983).
Spinoza, B. Theological-Political Treatise. In The Collected Works of Spinoza, ed. and trans. E. Curley (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016).
Strack, G. “Kant, Lange, and Nietzsche: Critique of Knowledge.” In Nietzsche and ModernGerman Thought, ed. K. Ansell-Pearson (London: Routledge, 1991).
Taylor, C. A Secular Age (Cambridge: Belknap Press, 2007).
Wilson, R.W. “The Prophet Books.” In The Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation, ed. J. Barton (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1998).
Young, J. Nietzsche’s Philosophy of Religion (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 243 | 154 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 9 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 24 | 8 | 1 |
It is common in accounts of the secularization of Western thought to make reference to the name of Nietzsche. Nietzsche is undeniably a critic of religion, but he is equally a critic of the secular. It is for this reason that I propose thinking about Nietzsche’s philosophy as postsecular. This term is one that has evolved over the last couple decades in response to the so-called “return of the religious” in society, social theory, and philosophy and suggests that secularity and religiosity are not antithetical and therefore that we must move beyond the forms of thinking that would regard them as such. First, I focus on his concepts of will to power, interpretation, perspectivism, and history, and sketch how they are all interrelated and how these ground his interpretation of religion. Based on this view, I show, second, that while religion is, for Nietzsche, a historical perspective, it is also, for him, part of the historical genealogy of secularity. This point leads to my final one on the relationship between secularity and religion in Nietzsche’s thought, where I argue that, on his own terms, Nietzsche’s anti-Christianity is a hyper-Christianity, even while rejecting facets of Christianity.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 243 | 154 | 7 |
Full Text Views | 9 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 24 | 8 | 1 |