We present correspondence sets involving word-initial consonants and including all known members of the Yeniseian language family. The data can be used for a systematic application of the comparative method, implying both the reconstruction of proto-phonemes and subsequent phylogenetic research questions (intrafamilial subdivisions among the Yeniseian languages according to shared phonological innovations). Key findings include (I) the discovery of an isogloss which separates Ket, Yugh and Pumpokol from Kott, Assan and Arin in terms of word-initial labial and dental plosives (voiced in the former group, voiceless in the other) and (II) the inference that Proto-Yeniseian (PY), i.e., the last common ancestor of all Yeniseian languages, probably had a two-layered system of plain voiced and plain voiceless stops. We do not see evidence for the postulation of lateral affricates. In addition, there are three correspondences of sibilants and uvulars, respectively, but we cannot, as yet, plausibly posit proto-phonemes in these cases.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bengtson, John D. 1990. ‘An end to splendid isolation: The Macro-Caucasic phylum.’ Mother Tongue. Newsletter of the Association for the Study of Language in Prehistory 10. 33–39. Available at: https://www.mother-tongue-journal.org/LR/MTN10.pdf (last accessed on 30 March 2023; no page numbers in the journal).
Bengtson, John D. 1991a. ‘Macro-Caucasian: A historical-linguistic hypothesis.’ In: Vitalij V. Ševoroškin (ed.). Dene-Sino-Caucasian Languages: materials from the First International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Language and Prehistory, Ann Arbor, 8.–12. November 1988. Bochum: Brockmeyer. 162–170.
Bengtson, John D. 1991b. ‘Notes on Sino-Caucasian.’ In: Vitalij V. Ševoroškin (ed.). Dene-Sino-Caucasian Languages: materials from the First International Interdisciplinary Symposium on Language and Prehistory, Ann Arbor, 8.–12. November 1988. Bochum: Brockmeyer. 67–129.
Bengtson, John D. 1998. ‘Caucasian and Sino-Tibetan: A hypothesis of S. A. Starostin.’ General Linguistics 36 (1/2). 33–49.
Blažek, Václav & John D. Bengtson. 1995a. ‘Lexica Dene-Caucasica.’ Central Asiatic Journal 39 (1). 11–50.
Blažek, Václav & John D. Bengtson. 1995b. ‘Additions and corrections to Lexica Dene-Caucasica.’ Central Asiatic Journal 39 (2). 161–164.
Castrén, Matthias Alexander. 1858. Versuch einer jenissej-ostjakischen und kottischen Sprachlehre, Saint Petersburg: Imperatorskaja Akademija Nauk.
Clements, George N. & Annie Rialland. 2005. ‘Nasal harmony in Ikwere, a language with no phonemic nasal consonants.’ Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 26. 165–200.
Collins, Henry B. 1954. Arctic Area. Indigenous Period. México: Comisión de Historia del Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia.
Denning, Rejngol’d [Roman] F. 1971. ‘Plavnye soglasnye ketskogo jazyka [Liquid consonants in Ket].’ Jazyki i toponimija Sibiri 4. 64–84.
Denning, Rejngol’d [Roman] F. 1973. ‘O prirode glasnyx [ə], [ʌ], [ɨ] v ketskom jazyke [The nature of the vowels [ə], [ʌ], [ɨ] in Ket].’ In: Proisxoždenie aborigenov Sibiri i ix jazykov. Tomsk: Tomskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. 24–26.
Denning, Rejngol’d [Roman] F. 1976. ‘Imbacko-symskie zvukovye sootvetstvija v sisteme soglasnyx [Imbat-Sym consonant sound correspondences].’ Jazyki i toponimija 2. 40–50.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1959a. ‘Geografičeskie nazvanija Zapadnoj Sibiri kak istočnik eë drevnej istorii [Toponyms of Western Siberia as a source on its ancient history].’ In: Nekotorye voprosy drevnej istorii Zapadnoj Sibiri. Tomsk: Tomskij oblastnoj kraevedčeskij muzej. 24–28.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1959b. ‘Ketskie toponimy Zapadnoj Sibiri [Ket toponyms of Western Siberia].’ Učënye zapiski Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogičeskogo instituta 18. 91–111.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1961. ‘Slovarnye materialy XVIII v. po enisejskim narečijam.’ Učënye zapiski Tomskogo pedagogičeskogo instituta, 19 (2). 152–189.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1963. ‘Ketskie narečija pervoj poloviny XVIII veka [Ket (=Yeniseian) languages of the first half of the eighteenth century].’ Trudy Tomskogo oblastnogo kraevedčeskogo muzeja 6 (2). 38–44.
Dul’zon, Andrei P. 1964. ‘Drevnie toponimy Južnoj Sibiri indoevropejskogo proisxoždenija [Ancient toponyms of Indo-European origin in Southern Siberia]’. In: Toponimika Vostoka. Novye issledovanija [Toponymics of the Orient. New Investigations]. Moskva: Nauka. 14–17.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1966. ‘Opyt ėtničeskoi privjazki toponimii substratnogo proisxoždenija [Determining the ethnic origin of substrate toponyms].’ Konferencija po toponimii severo-zapadnoj zony SSSR. Riga: Zinatne. 27–30.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1968. ‘Gunny i kety. (K voprosu ob ėtnogeneze po jazykovym dannym) [Huns and Kets: Linguistic data regarding ethnogenesis].’ Izvestija Sibirskogo otdelenija Akademii Nauk SSSR (Serija obščestvennyx nauk) 3 (11). 137–142.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1969. ‘Eine vorgeschichtliche Sprachgemeinschaft in Zentralasien. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 19 (1/2). 19–37.
Dul’zon, Andrej P. 1970. ‘Gruppa enisejskix jazykov [The Yeniseian language group].’ Filologičeskie nauki 5. 79–85.
Filimonov, Mixail V. 1988. ‘Nekotorye problemy praenisejskoj rekonstrukcii [Some problems of Proto-Yeniseian reconstruction].’ In: Fonetika i grammatika jazykov Sibiri. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 159–164.
Filimonov, Mixail V. 1989. ‘Zametki po sravnitel’noj fonetike enisejskix jazykov [Notes on Yeniseian comparative phonology].’ In: Zvukovye sistemy sibirskix jazykov. Novosibirsk: Nauka. 134–139.
Filimonov, Mixail V. 1997. ‘Fonosemantika i komparativistika: metodologičeskie problemy (po enisejskim dannym) [Phonosemantics and comparative linguistics: methodological problems (based on Yeniseian data)].’ In: Aktual’nye problemy lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki 1. Krasnojarsk: Krasnojarskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogičeskij universitet. 203–212.
Fortescue, Michael. 1998. Language Relations Across Bering Strait. Reappraising the Archaeological and Linguistic Evidence. London: Cassell.
Fortescue, Michael & Edward Vajda. 2022. Mid-Holocene Language Connections between Asia and North America. Leiden: Brill.
Georg, Stefan. 2007. A Descriptive Grammar of Ket (Yenisei-Ostyak). Part 1: Introduction, Phonology, Morphology. Folkestone: Global Oriental.
Haider, Hubert. 1983. ‘Der Fehlschluß der Typologie.’ In: Wolfgang Meid (ed.). Philologie und Sprachwissenschaft: Akten der 10. Österreichischen Linguisten-Tagung Innsbruck, 23.–26. Oktober 1982. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck. 79–92.
Hamp, Eric P. 1979. ‘Arin Ket consonants.’ In: The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, April 20–21, 1979. Including papers from the Conference on Non-Slavic languages of the USSR, April 18, 1979. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 275–276.
Hill, Eugen. 2008. ‘Lautgesetze und Dialektvariation in den Jenissej-Sprachen. Entwicklung der Labiale im Ketischen und Jugischen.’ Ural-Altaische Jahrbücher 22. 60–93.
Hill, Eugen. 2013. ‘Historical phonology in service of subgrouping. Two laws of final syllables in the common prehistory of Baltic and Slavonic.’ Baltistica 48 (2). 161–204.
Hill, Eugen. 2016. ‘Phonological evidence for a Proto-Baltic stage in the evolution of East and West Baltic.’ International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 13. 205–232.
Hock, Wolfgang. 2000. ‘Balto-Slavisch, Indo-Iranisch, Italo-Keltisch. Kriterien für die Annahme von Sprachgemeinschaften in der Indogermania.’ In: Jochen D. Range (ed.). Aspekte baltistischer Forschung. Essen: Blaue Eule. 119–145.
Ivanov, Vjačeslav V. 1975. ‘K sinxronnoj i diaxroničeskoj tipologii prozodičeskix sistem s laringalizovannymi ili faringalizovannymi tonemami [Toward a synchronic and diachronic typology of prosodic systems with laryngealized or pharyngealized tonemes].’ In: Očerki po fonologii vostočnyx jazykov. Moskva: Nauka. 3–58.
Janhunen, Juha. 1996. Manchuria. An Ethnic History. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.
Janhunen, Juha. 2020. ‘Towards an understanding of the lexical history of the Yeniseic languages.’ International Journal of Eurasian Linguistics 2 (1). 166–171.
Khabtagaeva, Bayarma. 2019. Language Contact in Siberia. Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic loanwords in Yeniseian. Leiden: Brill.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2014. ‘New perspectives in historical linguistics.’ In: Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.). Handbook of Historical Linguistics. New York: Routledge. 64–102.
Kotorova, Elizaveta & Andrej Nefedov (eds.). 2015. Comprehensive Dictionary of Ket with Russian, German, and English translations. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2012. ‘Typology and reconstruction. The consonants and vowels of Proto-Indo-European.’ In: Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead & Thomas Olander & Birgit Anette Olsen & Jens Elmegård Rasmussen (eds.). The Sound of Indo-European. Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. 291–329.
Levitskaja, L. S. & G. F. Blagova & A. V. Dybo & D. M. Nasilov. 2003. Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ tjurkskix jazykov: Obščetjurkskie i mežtjurkskie osnovy na bukvy « L », « M », « N », « P », « S » [Etymological dictionary of Turkic languages: Common Turkic and Pan-Turkic stems beginning in the letters L, M, N, P, S]. Moskva: Vostočnaja literatura.
Maloletko, Aleksej Mixajlovič. 1992. Paleotoponimika [Paleotoponymics]. Tomsk: Tomskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1962. ‘The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Appendix.’ Asia Major 9 (2). 239–265.
Ruhlen, Merritt. 1998. ‘The origin of the Na-Dene.’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95. 13994–996.
Sevortjan, Ė. V. 1978. Ėtimologičeskij slovar’ tjurkskix jazykov: Obščetjurkskie i mežtjurkskie osnovy na bukvu « B » [Etymological dictionary of Turkic languages: Common Turkic and Pan-Turkic stems beginning in the letter B]. Moskva: Nauka.
Starostin, Georgij S. 1995. ‘Rekonstrukcija praenisejskoj glagol’noj sistemy [Reconstruction of the Proto-Yeniseian verb system].’ Moskovskij lingvističeskij žurnal 1. 129–173.
Starostin, Sergej A. 1982. ‘Praenisejskaja rekonstrukcija i vnešnie svjazi enisejskix jazykov [Proto-Yeniseian reconstruction and the external relations of the Yeniseian languages].’ In: Ketskij sbornik. Antropologija, ėtnografija, mifologija, lingvistika. Leningrad: Nauka. 144–237.
*** Starostin, Sergej A. 1984. ‘Gipoteza o genetičeskix svjazjax sinotibetskix jazykov s enisejskimi i severnokavkazskimi jazykami [The hypothesis of a genetic link between Sino-Tibetan, Yeniseian, and North-Caucasian languages].’ In: Lingvističeskaja rekonstrukcija i drevnejšaja istorija Vostoka: tezisy i doklady konferencii 4. Moskva: Nauka. 19–38.
Starostin, Sergej A. 1995. ‘Sravnitel’nyj slovar’ enisejskix jazykov [Comparative dictionary of the Yeniseian languages].’ In: S. A. Starostin (ed.). Ketskij sbornik. Lingvistika. Moskva: Vostočnaja literatura. 176–315.
Starostin, Sergej A. & Merritt Ruhlen. 1994. ‘Proto-Yeniseian Reconstructions, with Extra-Yeniseian Comparisons.’ In: Merritt Ruhlen (ed.). On the Origin of Languages. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 70–92.
Stewart, John M. 1989. ‘Kwa.’ In: John Bendor-Samuel (ed.). The Niger-Congo Languages. A Classification and Description of Africa’s Largest Language Family. Lanham: University Press of America. 216–245.
Tailleur, Olivier Guy. 1964. ‘Contribution à la dialectologie iénisséienne: les parlers denka et poumpokolsk.’ In: Albert J. Windekens (ed.). Communications et rapports du Premier Congrès International de Dialectologie générale 7. Louvain: Centre international de dialectologie générale. 218–231.
Toporov, Vladimir N. 1967. ‘Iz ėtimologii enisejskix jazykov (k voprosu o sootvetstvijax pumpokol’skomu t) [From the etymology of Yeniseian languages (correspondences to Pumpokol t)].’ Ėtimologija 1965. 311–320.
Toporov, Vladimir N. 1968. ‘Materialy k sravnitel’no-istoričeskoj fonetike enisejskix jazykov. Arinsko-enisejskie sootvetstvija (čast’ 1) [Material for Yeniseian comparative-historical phonetics: Arin-Yeniseian correspondences (part 1)].’ In: Ketskij sbornik. Lingvistika. Moskva: Nauka. 277–330.
Toporov, Vladimir N. 1977. ‘Iz sravnitel’no-istoričeskoj fonetiki enisejskix jazykov: k rekonstrukcii obščeenisejskogo konsonantizma (predvaritel’nye soobščenija) [Yeniseian historical-comparative phonetics: toward reconstructing the common Yeniseian consonant system (preliminary report)].’ In: Nostratičeskie jazyki i nostratičeskoe jazykoznanie (tezisy). Moskva: Akademija nauk. 32–34.
Trombetti, Alfredo. 1923. Elementi di glottologia. Bologna: Nicola Zanichelli.
Vajda, Edward J. 2004. Ket. Munich: Lincom.
Vajda, E. J. 2010a. ‘A Siberian link with Na-Dene Languages.’ Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska 5 (New Series). 31–99.
Vajda, Edward J. 2010b. ‘Yeniseian, Na-Dene, and historical linguistics.’ Anthropological Papers of the University of Alaska 5 (New Series). 100–118.
Vajda, Edward J. 2012. Yeniseian Peoples and Languages. A History of Yeniseian Studies with an Annotated Bibliography and a Source Guide. London: Routledge.
Vajda, Edward J. 2019. ‘Morphology in Dene-Yeniseian languages.’ In: Mark Aronoff (ed.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093 /acrefore/9780199384655.013.631.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1969a. ‘K probleme genezisa indoevropejskogo ablauta [The problem of the origin of Indo-European ablaut].’ In: Voprosy dialektologii i jazykoznanija. Omsk: Omskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogičeskij institut. 64–85.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1969b. ‘K voprosu o drevnix enisejsko- indoevropejskix leksičeskix otnošenijax [Ancient Yeniseian-Indo-European lexical relations].’ In: Voprosy filologii. Omsk: Omskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogičeskij institut. 124–154.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1969c. ‘Zvukovye sootvetstvija meždu symskim i drugimi jazykami [Sound correspondences between Sym and other languages].’ In: Voprosy dialektologii i jazykoznanija. Omsk: Omskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogičeskij institut. 95–108.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1973. ‘O proisxoždenii pervogo tona v enisejskix jazykax [The origin of the first tone in Yeniseian languages].’ In: Voprosy tjurkskoj filologii. Kemerovo: Kemerovskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogičeskij institut. 34–37.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1977. ‘Voprosy ėvoljucii obščeenisejskogo jazyka v svete nostratičeskix rekonstrukcij [Questions of evolution of common Yeniseian in light of Nostratic reconstructions].’ In: Nostratičeskie jazyki i nostratičeskoe jazykoznanie (tezisy). Moskva: Akademija nauk. 7–10.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1979. ‘Pumpokol’sko-enisejskie zvukovye sootvetstvija [Pumpokol-Yeniseian sound correspondences].’ In: Voprosy stroja enisejskix jazykov. Novosibirsk: Akademija nauk SSSR, Sibirskoe otdelenie. 3–40.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1988. ‘Opyt rekonstrukcii obščeenisejskoj deklinacionnoj modeli [Reconstructing the Common Yeniseian declension system].’ Voprosy jazykoznanija 5. 84–95.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1990. Sravnitel’naja fonetika enisejskix jazykov [Comparative Phonetics of the Yeniseian Languages]. Taganrog: Taganrogskij pedagogičeskij institut.
Verner, Genrix K. [= Werner, Heinrich]. 1991. ‘K probleme germano-enisejskix leksičeskix otnošenij [The problem of Germanic-Yeniseian lexical relations].’ In: Slavistica. Indoevropeistika. Nostratika (tezisy). Moskva: Akademija nauk. 42–46.
Verner, Izol’da G. 1969. Voprosy imennoj klassifikacii v sovremennyx enisejskix dialektax [Questions of noun classification in modern Yeniseian languages]. In: Voprosy filologii. Omsk: Omskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogičeskij institut. 170–179.
Vovin, Alexander. 2000. ‘Did the Xiong-nu speak a Yeniseian language?’ Central Asiatic Journal 44 (1). 87–104.
Werner, Heinrich. 1997a. Das Jugische (Sym-Ketische). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Werner, Heinrich. 1997b. Die ketische Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Werner, Heinrich. 1997c. Abriß der kottischen Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Werner, Heinrich. 1998. ‘Reconstructing Proto-Yeniseian.’ Mother Tongue 4. 17–26.
Werner, Heinrich. 2002a. Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen. Band 1: A-K. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Werner, Heinrich. 2002b. Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der Jenissej-Sprachen. Band 2: L-Š. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Werner, Heinrich. 2005a. Die Jenissej-Sprachen des 18. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Werner, Heinrich. 2005b. ‘Zu den jenissejischen Etymologien mit der Lautentsprechung *
Werner, Heinrich & Nikolaj Schablo. 1987. ‘Über die Natur der vokalischen Alternationen in der ketischen Sprache.’ In: Proceedings XI-th ICPhS. The Eleventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, August 1–7, 1987, Tallin, Estonia. Tallinn: Academy of Sciences of the Estonian S.S.R. Vol 2: 280–283.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 490 | 423 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 160 | 17 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 297 | 36 | 4 |
We present correspondence sets involving word-initial consonants and including all known members of the Yeniseian language family. The data can be used for a systematic application of the comparative method, implying both the reconstruction of proto-phonemes and subsequent phylogenetic research questions (intrafamilial subdivisions among the Yeniseian languages according to shared phonological innovations). Key findings include (I) the discovery of an isogloss which separates Ket, Yugh and Pumpokol from Kott, Assan and Arin in terms of word-initial labial and dental plosives (voiced in the former group, voiceless in the other) and (II) the inference that Proto-Yeniseian (PY), i.e., the last common ancestor of all Yeniseian languages, probably had a two-layered system of plain voiced and plain voiceless stops. We do not see evidence for the postulation of lateral affricates. In addition, there are three correspondences of sibilants and uvulars, respectively, but we cannot, as yet, plausibly posit proto-phonemes in these cases.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 490 | 423 | 36 |
Full Text Views | 160 | 17 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 297 | 36 | 4 |