The Commission: A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing?

On Infringement Proceedings as a Legal Device for the Enforcement of eu Law on the Environment, Using Swedish Wolf Management as an Example

in Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article centres on the effectiveness of Article 258 tfeu proceedings for the enforcement of eu environmental law. Employing as an example the case between the Commission and Sweden on the licensed hunting of wolves – a species enjoying strict protection in accordance with the Habitats Directive – the pros and cons will be discussed of infringement proceedings for the enforcement of the common responsibilities in the environmental area. While these proceedings can be effective in situations where they are used, they suffer unpredictability and a lack of consistency owing to political balancing within the Commission. Furthermore, lack of transparency in communication between the Commission and the governments of the Member States prevent public scrutiny of the system, which contributes to alienation of the eu from the public. Finally, on areas of environmental law – which are highly dependent upon scientific expert knowledge and thus dominated by ‘soft guidelines’ – infringement proceedings are an important complement to references from national courts to cjeu for preliminary rulings on controversial issues in order to avoid ‘circular decision-making’. Thus, the Swedish wolf issue can serve as a background for a more general discussion on infringement proceedings as an effective means for the enforcement of environmental law within the Union.

The Commission: A Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing?

On Infringement Proceedings as a Legal Device for the Enforcement of eu Law on the Environment, Using Swedish Wolf Management as an Example

in Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law

Sections

References

9

C-115/09 (2011) para. 48.

11

One year earlier in autumn 2012sepa reported 380 animals as frp to the Commission to which the Minister of the Environment Lena Ek immediately responded in the media that 180 was sufficient.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 33 33 5
Full Text Views 92 92 54
PDF Downloads 6 6 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0