The Buhen Horse: Fifty Years after Its Discovery (1958–2008)
In: Journal of Egyptian HistorySearch for other papers by Peter Raulwing in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Juliet Clutton-Brock in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The horse skeleton found in the autumn of 1958 at the fortress of Buhen in northern Sudan has become one of the most prominent, but also one of the most enigmatic equid remains from the second millennium BC: Firstly, because of its assumed early date of c. 1675 BC, deduced by W.B. Emery after analysing the stratigraphical data, This – according to our knowledge at the time – being several decades before the oldest known equid remains in Egypt. Secondly, because of wear on the lower left second premolar (LP2), which has led to the conclusion that it was most probably caused by bit-wear. Since the 1960s, both conclusions have been subject to criticism. The purpose of this study is to provide a review of the history of research and reception of the Buhen horse in its interdisciplinary context over the last fifty years with the result that only modern scientific techniques might be able to solve some of the outstanding questions.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 486 | 124 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 294 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 203 | 36 | 1 |
The Buhen Horse: Fifty Years after Its Discovery (1958–2008)
In: Journal of Egyptian HistorySearch for other papers by Peter Raulwing in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juliet Clutton-Brock in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The horse skeleton found in the autumn of 1958 at the fortress of Buhen in northern Sudan has become one of the most prominent, but also one of the most enigmatic equid remains from the second millennium BC: Firstly, because of its assumed early date of c. 1675 BC, deduced by W.B. Emery after analysing the stratigraphical data, This – according to our knowledge at the time – being several decades before the oldest known equid remains in Egypt. Secondly, because of wear on the lower left second premolar (LP2), which has led to the conclusion that it was most probably caused by bit-wear. Since the 1960s, both conclusions have been subject to criticism. The purpose of this study is to provide a review of the history of research and reception of the Buhen horse in its interdisciplinary context over the last fifty years with the result that only modern scientific techniques might be able to solve some of the outstanding questions.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 486 | 124 | 12 |
| Full Text Views | 294 | 15 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 203 | 36 | 1 |