The “Moghul’s Admiral”: Angrian “Piracy” and the Rise of British Bombay

in Journal of Early Modern History
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

This article explores the political and legal construction of the concept of piracy in British India. By examining the discourses promulgated and policies enacted in the Bombay Presidency in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, it shows how the seemingly paradoxical designation of coastal polities as “piratical states” opened up new paths for imperial domination. Rather than territorial conquest heralding new claims to maritime sovereignty, it was Britain’s piracy strategy that brought about the subordination of a growing number of Indian rulers to the dictates of the Company. This revised perspective recommends a wider rethinking of the role of so-called piracy in European imperial expansion in Asia.

Sections
References
  • 6

    Stern“British Asia and British Atlantic: Comparisons and Connections,” William and Mary Quarterly 63 no. 4 (2006): 695.

  • 10

    John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson“The Imperialism of Free Trade,” The Economic History Review 6 no. 1 (1953): 1-15.

  • 12

    BaylyImperial Meridian249.

  • 13

    P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins“The Political Economy of British Expansion Overseas, 1750-1914,” Economic History Review 33 no. 4 (November 1980): 464.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson“The Imperialism of Free Trade,” The Economic History Review 6 no. 1 (1953): 1-15.

  • 16

    Patrick Cadell“The Acquisition and Rise of Bombay,” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (New Series) 90 (July 1958): 113-21.

  • 18

    Das GuptaIndian Merchants and the Decline of Surat8.

  • 22

    V. D. Savarkar“To Free the Hindu Seas,” in The Maratha Struggle (Hindu-Pad-Padshahi); or A Review of the Hindu Empire of Maharashtra5th ed. (New Delhi 2003 [1925]) 61-73.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23

    Richard Pankhurst“The Ethiopian Diaspora to India: The Role of Habshis and Sidis from Medieval Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century,” in The African Diaspora in the Indian Oceaned. Shihan de S. Jayasuriya and Pankhurst (Trenton 2003) 212-13.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24

    Rahul C. Oka and Chapurukha M. Kusimba“Siddi as Mercenary or as African Success Story,” in Indian in Africa Africa in India: Indian Ocean Cosmopolitanismsed. John C. Hawley (Bloomington 2008) 205-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    Oka and Kusimba“Siddi as Mercenary” 221-2.

  • 29

    Das GuptaIndian Merchants and the Decline of Surat261.

  • 32

    ArasaratnamMaritime India in the Seventeenth Century267.

  • 34

    Lakshmi Subramanian“Of Pirates and Potentates: Maritime Jurisdiction and the Construction of Piracy in the Indian Ocean,” in UTS Review: The Indian Oceaned. Devleen Ghosh and Stephen Muecke 6 no. 2 (2000): 22 20.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37

    A. B. Leonard“Underwriting British Trade to India and China, 1780-1835,” The Historical Journal 55 no. 4 (Dec. 2012): 983-1006; Leonard “A Financial History of London Marine Insurance 1547-1824” (Ph.D. thesis University of Cambridge forthcoming).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 43

    They were allowed to do this until 1806. Nightingale Trade and Empire 24.

  • 47

    SenAnglo-Maratha Relations286.

  • 48

    L. Subramanian“Power and the Weave: Weavers, Merchants and Rulers in Eighteenth-century Surat,” Politics and Trade in the Indian Ocean World: Essays in Honour of Ashin Das Guptaed. Rudrangshu Mukherjee and L. Subramanian (Delhi 1998) 54; Nightingale Trade and Empire 23.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 50

    Munajee Angria to Malet 23 June 1797MSA/S&P/57.5.

  • 51

    Council’s Minute 13 June 1797MSA/S&P/57.5.

  • 54

    Manaji to Malet 27 August 1797MSA/S&P/57.5.

  • 56

    Council’s Minute 23 March 1798MSA/S&P/61.10.

  • 57

    Hurray Gopal to Duncan 12 March 1798MSA/S&P/61.10.

  • 58

    William Simpson to Duncan 13 March 1798MSA/S&P/61.10.

  • 60

    Hurry Gopal to Duncan 17 March 1798MSA/S&P/61.10.

  • 61

    Baburao Angria to Duncan 30 November 1798MSA/S&P/61.10

  • 63

    William Palmer to Duncan 7 December 1798MSA/S&P/70.18.

  • 64

    Anonymous“An Appeal to British justice and honour: The treatment of the protected native states of India by the government of the East India company, illustrated in the case of the state of Colaba, commonly called Angria’s Colaba, near Bombay, in the East Indies,” Hume Tracts (1841): 34 35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    Lord Minto minute 3 April 1812MSA/S&P/278.2.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 57 56 5
Full Text Views 94 94 0
PDF Downloads 26 26 0
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0