The Danish East India Company’s War against the Mughal Empire, 1642-1698

in Journal of Early Modern History
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article examines the violence surrounding a war that the Danish East India Company declared against the Mughal Empire during the mid-seventeenth century. To explain why such a small chartered company would declare war against such a formidable foe, the relationship between trade, violence and statecraft in both societies is discussed at length. The article further describes how the war was waged, including the complex legal situation surrounding it and the various ways in which the opponents tried to hold each other responsible for losses. Using the Danish-Mughal war as a vehicle for exploring relations between European and Asian merchants, the article argues that violence was the contingency plan of even the weakest European companies.

The Danish East India Company’s War against the Mughal Empire, 1642-1698

in Journal of Early Modern History

Sections

References

2

Luís Filipe F.R. Thomaz“Portuguese Control over the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal: A Comparative Study,” in Commerce and Culture in the Bay of Bengal 1500-1800ed. Om Prakash and Denys Lombard (New Delhi 1999) 120 and Sebastian R. Prange “A Trade of No Dishonor: Piracy Commerce and Community in the Western Indian Ocean Twelfth to Sixteenth Century” American Historical Review 116 no. 5 (2011): 1272-1275. See also Anthony Reid “Violence at Sea: Unpacking “Piracy” in the Claims of States over Asian Seas” in Elusive Pirates Pervasive Smugglers; Violence and Clandestine Trade in the Greater China Seas ed. Robert J. Anthony (Hong Kong 2010) 15-26 and Giancarlo Casale “Ottoman Guerre de Course and the Indian Ocean Spice Trade: The Career of Sefer Reis” Itinerario 23 no. 1 (2008): 59-79.

5

John F. Guilmartin“The military revolution in warfare at sea during the early modern era: technological origins, operational outcomes and strategic consequences,” Journal for Maritime Research 13 no. 2 (2011): 130-134.

6

N.A.M. Rodger“From the ‘military revolution’ to the ‘fiscal-naval state’,” Journal for Maritime Research 13 no. 2 (2011): 121-123.

11

Ole Feldbæk“The Organization and Structure of the Danish East India, West India and Guinea Companies,” Companies and Tradeed. L. Blussé and F. Gaastra (The Hague 1981) 136.

12

lrfan Habib“Merchant communities in precolonial India,” in The Rise of Merchant Empires Long-Distance Trade in the Early Modern Worlded. James D. Tracy (Cambridge 1990) 396; Sanjay Subrahmanyam “Of imârat and tijârat: Asian Merchants and State Power in the Western Indian Ocean 1400 to 1750” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31 no. 3 ( 1995): 754-758; Sanjay Subrahmanyam The Portuguese Empire in Asia 1500-1700: A Political and Economic History (London 1993) 11-21 274-276.

13

Tapan Raychaudhuri“The State and the Economy: The Mughal Empire,” in The Cambridge Economic History of Indiai ed. Tapan Raychaudhuri and Irfan Habib (Cambridge 1982) 172-73.

17

Muzaffar Alam and Sanjay Subrahmanyam“L’Etat Moghol et sa fiscalité” 199-201.

18

Ashin das GuptaIndian Merchants and the Decline of Surat15.

19

Tonio Andrade“Beyond Guns, Germs, and Steel: European Expansion and Maritime Asia, 1400-1750,” Journal of Early Modern History 14 (2010): 180.

20

Anthony Reid“The Rise of Makassar,” Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs 17 (1983): 117-160.

21

Sebastian R. Prange“A Trade of No Dishonor” 1276.

22

Craig A. Lockard“ ‘The Sea Common to All’: Maritime Frontiers, Port Cities, and Chinese Traders in the Southeast Asian Age of Commerce ca. 1400-1750,” Journal of World History 21 no. 2 (2010): 231; Leonard Y. Andaya Leaves of the same tree: trade and ethnicity in the Straits of Melaka (Honolulu 2008) 178-184; Sebastian R. Prange “The Contested Sea: Regimes of Maritime Violence in the Pre-Modern Indian Ocean” Journal of Early Modern History 17 (2013): 24-25.

26

Laursen ed.Danmark-Norges Traktater 1523-1750328-358.

27

Ole Feldbæk“No Ship for Tranquebar for Twenty-nine Years. Or: The Art of Survival of a Mid-Seventeenth Century European Settlement in India,” in Emporia Commodities and Entrepreneurs in Asian Maritime Trade c. 1400-1750ed. Roderich Ptak and Dietmar Rothemund (Stuttgart 1991) 30.

46

Feldbæk“No Ship for Tranquebar for Twenty-nine Years” 30.

49

In 1646the Danish Company wished to send a Bengali ship to Makassar in place of Fortuna. (“Breff Hannom Thilschreffuitt Fra Dansborgh” f. 4.)

55

OlsenDansk Ostindien140.

58

See P.J. Marshall“Western Arms in Maritime Asia in the Early Phases of Expansion,” Modern Asian Studies 14 no. 1 (1980): 13-28 and Geoffrey Parker The Military Revolution: Military innovation and the rise of the West 1500-1800 (Cambridge 1988).

63

BredsdorffThe Trials and Travels of Willem Leyel80.

64

Ibid.134-135.

65

OlsenDansk Ostindien139-141.

67

Feldbæk“No Ship for Tranquebar for Twenty-nine Years” 35.

74

BredsdorffThe Trials and Travels of Willem Leyel22.

77

Gunnar OlsenDansk Ostindien168.

79

Sven Clausen“Den Dansk-Begalske Trediveårskrig,” in Dansk kolonihistorie Indføring og studier ed. Peter Hoxcer Jensen et al. (Århus 1983) 109.

81

Ibid.907.

82

OlsenDansk Ostindien184.

90

Kay Larsen“Da Fattiromany blev taget: En dansk Kup i Bengalen 1714,” Vikingen 17 no. 1 (1940): 31.

96

Clulow“European Maritime Violence” 80.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 29 29 6
Full Text Views 59 59 44
PDF Downloads 3 3 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0