Visibly Unlike: Religious Dress between Affiliation and Difference

in Journal of Empirical Theology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

This article focuses on the relevance and consequences of visibility of religious identity respectively difference by means of religiously connoted clothing. Based on six case studies it emphasizes the perspective of wearers of religious vestment in the area of Zürich (Switzerland). The project takes account of the fact, that the aspect of visual, respectively embodied (religious) difference is not only of relevance to Muslim headscarf wearers (though, due to eager public discussion, it became here the most obvious, and the main subject of scientific interest), but also for wearers of religious clothing belonging to other religious communities. Regarding the case studies the present article will mainly focus on three aspects of religious clothing: firstly, it will address one important motive (among others) for wearing religious dress. Secondly, the individual perceptions of visual difference based on the specific way of sartorial self-presentation will be thematised — especially regarding their involvement with their social environment. Finally, various individual strategies for coping with tensions based on the experience of visual difference will be demonstrated.

Visibly Unlike: Religious Dress between Affiliation and Difference

in Journal of Empirical Theology

Sections

References

ButlerJ., Undoing gender, (Routledge, New York 2004).

DerridaJ., Marges de la philosophie, (Ed. de Minuit (Collection Critique), Paris 1972).

EicherJ. B.EvensonS. L.LutzH. A., The visible self: Global perspectives on dress culture and society, (Fairchild, New York 2008).

GeertzC., Dichte Beschreibung. Beiträge zum Verstehen kultureller Systeme, (Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag, Frankfurt Main 1995).

GoffmanE., Wir alle spielen Theater. Die Selbstdarstellung im Alltag, (Piper, München/Zürich 1983).

GoffmanE., 'Interaktionsrituale', in Über Verhalten in direkter Kommunikation, (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1986).

HallS., Ideologie Identität Repräsentation, (Argument Verlag, Hamburg 2004) Ausgewählte Schriften 4..

LamontM.MolnarV., 'The Study of Boundaries in the Social Science' (2002) 28 Annual Review of Sociology: 167-195.

Dorothea Lüddeckens, Christoph Uehlinger and Rafael Walthert (eds), Die Sichtbarkeit religiöser Identität. Repräsentation — Differenz — Konflikt, (Pano, Zürich 2011) (Reihe CULTuREL).

MeadG. H., Mind self and society, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1934).

MecherilP.MiandashtiS.KötterH., '“Anerkennung als Subjekt” — eine konzeptuelle Orientierung für die psychosoziale Arbeit mit Migrantinnen und Migranten' (1997) 4 Verhaltenstherapie & psychosoziale Praxis: 559-575.

NökelS.Die Töchter der Gastarbeiter und der IslamZur Soziologie alltagsweltlicher Anerkennungspolitiken; eine Fallstudie2002Zugl.Bielefeld, Univ.Diss. 2001. Bielefeld: Transcript

SchafferJ., Ambivalenzen der Sichtbarkeit. Über die visuellen Strukturen der Anerkennung, (Transcript, Bielefeld 2008).

SollorsW., Neither black nor white yet both. Thematic explorations of interracial literature, (Oxford University Press, New York etc. 1997).

StoneG. P., 'Appearance and the Self', in Arnold M. Rose (ed), Human Behavior and Social Processes: An Interactionist Approach, (Houghton Mifflin Company, New York 1962) 86-116.

H. Willems and M. Jurga (eds), Inszenierungsgesellschaft. Ein einführendes Handbuch, (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1998).

WürtzS.EckertR., 'Aspekte modischer Kommunikation', in H. Willems and Martin Jurga (eds), Inszenierungsgesellschaft. Ein einführendes Handbuch, (Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen 1998) 177-191.

YoungI. M., 'Unruly Categories. A Critique of Nancy Fraser’s Dual System Theory' (1997) 222 New Left Review: 147-160.

4

Compare Gregory Stone (1962) applying George Herbert Mead’s theory of symbolic interaction.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 23 23 17
Full Text Views 2 2 2
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0