Religion as a Predictor for the Support of Judicial Human Rights?

An Empirical Study among German Youth of Different Religious Affiliation

in Journal of Empirical Theology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Human rights are the cornerstones of modern liberal democracies, but this does not mean that they can be taken for granted. Human rights need the support of the people. But how willing are people to support them? This question points to the problem of the legitimacy of human rights. This research paper focuses on judicial human rights such as freedom from torture, the rights of accused persons and the inviolability of the home. A quantitative, empirical survey was carried out among 2,244 German youth in the age group of 16 years, and this paper explores what attitudes these young German respondents have towards the rights referred to above. The assumption is that several other factors influence attitudes towards judicial rights; the paper considers human dignity, which is a constitutional right in Germany, but also religious beliefs, personality traits and society’s socio-political perception. The findings show that only two judicial rights (freedom from torture and the inviolability of the home) are positively valued by the respondents. From all predictors included in the research survey, the two strongest are sex (being female) and a low degree of authoritarianism. The comparison of religious groups shows that Muslims differ strongly from Catholics, Protestants and non-religious youth.

Religion as a Predictor for the Support of Judicial Human Rights?

An Empirical Study among German Youth of Different Religious Affiliation

in Journal of Empirical Theology



AlbertazziD. and McDonnellD. (2008) Twenty-First century populism: The spectre of western European democracy. New York and London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Altemeyer B. and Hunsberger B. (1992) Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and PrejudiceInternational Journal for the Psychology of Religion2 (2) 113-133.

Bagaric M. and Allen J. (2006) The Vacuous concept of DignityJournal of Human Rights5257-270.

Barak A. (2013) Human Dignity: The Constitutional Value and the Constitutional Right in: Chr. McCruddenUnderstanding Human DignityOxford: Oxford University Press361-380.

Calhoun C. (1988) Justice, Care, Gender Bias in: The Journal of Philosophy85 (9) 451-463.

Cohrs J.C.Maes J.Moschner B. and Kielmann S. (2007) Determinants of human rights attitudes and behavior. A comparison and integration of psychological perspectives in: Political Psychology 28 pp. 441-469.

Davis M.H. (1983) Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy. Evidence for a Multidimensional Approach in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology44113-126.

Dershowitz A. (2008) Is there a right to remain silent? Coercive Interrogation and the fifth Amendment after 9/11Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DeVellis R.F. (2003) Scale development: Theory and applicationsLondon: Sage.

Diaz-Veizades J.Widaman K.F.Little T.D. and Gibbs K.W. (1995) The measurement and structure of human rights attitudes. In Journal of Social Psychology 135 pp. 313-328.

Doise W.Spini D. and Clémence A. (1999) Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context. In European Journal of Social Psychology 29 pp. 1-29.

Fukuyma F. (2011) The Origins of Political Order. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Gilligan C. and Attanucci J. (1988) Two moral orientations: Gender differences and Similarities in: Merrill-Palmer Quarterly34223-237.

Greve H. (2014) Rechtfertigung privater „Folter“ zwischen Nothilfe und Menschenwürde in: ZIS (Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik) 9 (5) 236-245.

Grimm D. (2013) Dignity in a Legal Context: Dignity as an absolute Right in: Chr. McCruddenUnderstanding Human DignityOxford: Oxford University Press381-391.

Habermas J. (1993) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

HoffmanM.L. (1990) Empathy and Justice Motivation in: Motivation and Emotion14151-172.

Hunt L. (2007) Inventing Human Rights: A HistoryNew York: Norton.

Ignatieff M. (2001) Human rights as politics and idolatryPrinceton: Princeton University Press.

Jayawickrama N. (2002) The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law. National Regional and International JurisprudenceCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joas H. (2014) The Sacredness of the Person: A New Genealogy of Human RightsGeorgetown Univ. Press.

KellyP. (2002) Multiculturalism reconsidered: Culture and equality and its criticsOxford: Polity Press.

McCrudden C. (2008) Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights in: The European Journal of International Law19(4) 655-724.

McCrudden Chr. (2012) Legal and Roman Catholic Conceptions of Human Rights in: Oxford Journal of Law and Religion1185-201.

McFarland S./Mathews M. (2005) Who Cares About Human Rights in Political Psychology 26365-385.

ModoodT. (2015) Multiculturalism in: The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race Ethnicity and Nationalism1-6.

Moghaddam F.M. and Vuksanovic V. (1990) Attitudes and behavior toward human rights across different contexts. The role of right-wing authoritarianism, political ideology, and religiosity. In International Journal of Psychology 25455-474.

Nordenfelt M.N.L. (2004) The Varieties of Dignity in: Health Care Analysis 12 (2) 69-89.

Nunnally J.C. and Bernstein I.H. (1994) Psychometric TheoryNew York: McGraw-Hill.

Rattazzi A.M.M.Bobbio A. and CanovaL. (2007) A short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale in: Personality and Individual Differences43 (5) 1223-1234.

Rawls J. (2005) Political LiberalismExpanded editionNew York: Columbia University Press.

rhr (Religion and Human Rights) (2012) The Religion and Human Rights Program. Source:

Rosen M. (2012) Dignity — its history and meaningCambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.

Safferling Chr. and Hartwig A.. (2009) Das Recht zu Schweigen und seine Konsequenzen in: ZIS (Zeitschrift für internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik) 4 (13) 784-794.

Staerklé C. and ClémenceA. (2004) Why people are committed to human rights and still tolerate their violation. A contextual analysis of the Principal-Application Gap in: Social Justice Research 17389-406.

Stellmacher J.Sommer G. and Brähler E. (2005) Human rights. Knowledge, importance and support. Results of two representative studies in Germany in: Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 11267-292.

Van der Ven J.A. (2012) Religion and Human Rights. Programmatic paper. Source:

Van der Ven J.A. and Ziebertz H.-G. (2012) (eds.) Tensions within and between Religions and Human RightsLeiden: Brill.

Van der Ven J.A. and Ziebertz H.-G. (2013) (eds.) Human Rights and the Impact of ReligionLeiden: Brill.

Ven van derJ.A. (1998) God Reinvented? A Theological Search in Text and TablesLeiden: Brill.

Verkuyten M. and Yildiz A.A. (2006) The endorsement of minority rights. The role of group position, national context, and ideological beliefs in: Political Psychology 27527-548.

Ziebertz H.-G. (2004) God Image. The conceptual Triangle of the Image of God. A quantitative empirical Study of young people in Germany in: C. Hermans and M.E. Moore (eds.) Hermeneutics and Empirical Research in Practical TheologyLeiden: Brill75-100.

Ziebertz H.-G. and Benzing T. (2012) Menschenrechte - trotz oder wegen Religion?Münster: LIT.

Ziebertz H.-G.Döhnert S. and Unser A. (2017) Predictors of attitudes towards human dignity: an empirical analysis among youth in Germany in: H.-G. Ziebertz and C. Sterkens (eds.) Religion and civil human rights in empirical perspectiveHeidelberg: Springer.



Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 65 65 7
Full Text Views 63 63 47
PDF Downloads 5 5 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0