Exploring Single and Multiple Religious Belonging

in Journal of Empirical Theology
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

This contribution studies the notion of single and multiple religious belonging in a sample of 265 Dutch respondents. We will first focus on modalities of religious belonging and subsequently compare those who claim to draw from just one religion (the monoreligious) with those who indicate that they combine elements from different religious traditions (the multireligious) in terms of their intensities and styles of belonging, loyalty and mobility, and motivations for belonging. In general, multireligious respondents are characterized by their larger flexibility in religious matters as they tend to focus on similarities and common elements in different religions, and less on boundaries between them. By being loyal to themselves in the first place, they feel free to adopt and to leave behind religious beliefs and communities. Emotional and institutional bonds for each religion appear to be less strong than for monoreligious individuals in relation to their single religion.

Sections
References
  • AllportG.W. and J.M. Ross. (1967). “Personal religious orientation and prejudice” in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 5423-443.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BatsonC.D. (1976). “Religion as prosocial: Agent or double agent?” in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 1529-45.

  • BatsonC.D. and W.L. Ventis. (1982). The Religious Experience: a Social-Psychological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BernhardtR. and P. Schmidt-Leukel. (2008). Multiple religiöse Identität: Aus verschiedenen religiösen Traditionen schöpfen. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BerghuijsJ. (2017). “Multiple Religious Belonging in the Netherlands: An Empirical Approach to Hybrid Religiosity” in Open Theology 3: 19-37.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BerntsT. and J. Berghuijs. (2016). God in Nederland 1966-2015. Utrecht: Ten Have.

  • BraakA. van der. (2017). “Zen-Christian Dual Belonging and the Practice of Apophasis: Strategies of Meeting Rose Drew’s Theological Challenge” in Open Theology 3434-466.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CornilleC. (2002) editor. Many Mansions?: Multiple Religious Belonging and Christian Identity. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock publishers.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CornilleC. (2003). “Double religious belonging: Aspects and questions” in Buddhist-Christian Studies 2343-49.

  • GlockC.Y. and R. Stark. (1965). Religion and society in tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

  • HartJ. de. (2014). Geloven binen en buiten verband: Godsdienstige ontwikkelingen in Nederland. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau: 1160-61.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HirschiT. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press

  • Hirschman A. (1970). Exit voice and loyalty. Responses to decline in firms organizations and states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KalskyM. (2012). “Religious diversity as a challenge to theology: The research projects of the Dutch Dominican Study Centre for Theology and Society” In KalskyM. & and NissenP. editors. A Glance in the Mirror: Dutch and Polish religious cultures pp. 63-76. Münster: Lit-Verlag.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KalskyM. (2017). “Flexible Believers in the Netherlands: A Paradigm Shift toward Transreligious Multiplicity” in Open Theology 3: 345-459.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LähdesmäkiT.T. SaresmaK. HiltunenS. JänttiN. SääskilahtiA. Vallius and K. Ahvenjärvi (2016). “Fluidity and flexibility of ‘belonging’: uses of the concept in contemporary research”. Acta Sociologica29233-247.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LintonR. (1936). The study of man. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

  • McGuireM.B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

  • OostveenD. (2017). “Multiple Religious Belonging: Hermeneutical Challenges for Theology and Religious Studies”. Open Theology 3: 38-47.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pew Forum on Religion and public life. (2009). Many Americans mix multiple faiths: Eastern New Age beliefs Widespread. Washington: Pew Research Center.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pew Research Center. (2015). U.S. Public becoming less religious. Washington: Pew Research Center.

  • PhanP.C. (2003). “Multiple religious belonging: Opportunities and challenges for theology and Church” in Theological Studies 64495-519.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PollackD. and O. Müller. (2013). Religionsmonitor: Verstehen was verbindet: Religiosität und Zusammenhalt in Deutschland. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReitsmaJ.PelzerB.J.ScheepersP.L.H. & SchildermanJ.B.A.M. (2014). “Believing and Belonging in Europe. Cross-national comparisons of longitudinal trends (1981-2007) and determinants” (reprint). Journal of Empirical Theology27 (1) 154-175. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15709256-12341292.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchildermanJ.B.A.M. (2014). “Religiosität und Säkularität in Europa: empirisch-theologische Perspektiven” in M. Rose & M. Wermke editors. Konfessionslosigkeit heute. Zwischen Religiosität und Säkularität pp. 29-44. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt-LeukelP. (2008). “Multireligiöse Identität: Anmerkungen aus pluralistischer Sicht” in: BernhardtR. & Schmidt-LeukelP. editors. Multiple religiöse Identität: Aus verschiedenen religiösen Traditionen schöpfen pp. 243-265. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt-LeukelP. (2009). Transformation by integration: how interfaith encounter changes Christianity. London: SCM Press.

  • SmartN. (1998). Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 152 146 21
Full Text Views 220 217 3
PDF Downloads 36 34 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0