Spiritual but not Religious?
New Mevlevis of Contemporary Mevleviye in Turkey
In: Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Hande Gür in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Mevleviye as an Islamic religious order is established in Anatolia after the passing of Mevlana Celaleddin-i Rumi in the 13th century. Based on bigger ethnographic research, this paper tries to delve into the distinction between spiritual and religious from the perspective of new Mevlevis of contemporary Mevleviye in Turkey. The authenticity of new Mevlevis’ standpoint while defining themselves as spiritual but not religious reflects the effects of modernization and individualization in Turkey as well as Mevleviye’s particular approach to spirituality. This reflection seems to reveal the flaws of Western definitions of the spiritual that is often presented as a contrary notion to being religious. Besides offering a discussion on the case of new Mevlevis’ understanding of spiritual and religious, this paper also argues that spirituality has to be studied empirically and defined in regards to its context and culture rather than as an essentially contrasting notion to being religious.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Arweck, Elisabeth (2006). Researching New Religious Movements: Responses and Redefinitions. London: Routledge.
-
Arberry, Arthur John (2008). Sufism: An Account of the Mystics of Islam. London: Routledge.
-
Atacan, Fulya (1990). Sosyal Değisme ve Tarikat: Cerrahiler [Social Change and Religious Order: Jerrahis] (1st ed.). Istanbul: Hil Yayın.
-
Barker, Eileen (1999). “New Religious Movements: Their Incidence and Significance” in Wilson, Bryan and Cresswell, Jamie (Eds.) New Religious Movements: Challenge and Response, 15-32. London: Routledge.
-
Barks, Coleman (2011). Rumi: The Big Red Book: The Great Masterpiece Celebrating Mystical Love and Friendship (1st ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
-
Bauman, Zygmunt (1995). Life in Fragments: Essays in Postmodern Morality. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Berkes, Niyazi (2003). Türkiye’de Çağdaşlaşma [Modernization in Turkey] (4th ed.). Istanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
-
Brewer, John (2005). Understanding Social Research Series: Ethnography (3rd ed.). Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
-
Bridger, Francis (2001). “Desperately Seeking What? Engaging with the New Spiritual Quest” in Journal of Christian Education, 44(1), 7-14.
-
Brimadevi van, Niekerk (2018). “Religion and Spirituality: What are the Fundamental Differences?” in HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 74(3), 4933. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v74i3.4933.
-
Bromley, David (2007). “Methodological Issues in the Study of New Religious Movements” in Bromley, David (Ed.) Teaching New Religious Movements, 65-89. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
-
Enroth, Ronald (2005). “What is a New Religious Movement?” in Enroth, Ronald (Ed.) A guide to New Religious Movements, 9-25. Illinois: InterVarsity Press.
-
Flanagan, Kieran (2007). “Introduction” in Flanagan, Kieran and Jupp, Peter (Eds.) A Sociology of Spirituality, 1-21. Hampshire: Ashgate.
-
Fuller, Robert (2001). Spiritual, But Not Religious: Understanding Unchurched America. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
-
Flory, Richard and Miller, Donald (2007). “The Embodied Spirituality of the Post-Boomer Generations” in Flanagan, Kieran and Jupp, Peter (Eds.) A Sociology of Spirituality, 201-218. Hampshire: Ashgate.
-
Giritli, İsmet (1988). “Modernleşme İdeolojisi Olarak Atatürkçülük” in Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, March (1), I-IV.
-
Giordan, Giuseppe (2007). “Spirituality: From a Religious concept to Sociological Theory” in Flanagan, Kieran and Jupp, Peter (Eds.) A Sociology of Spirituality, 161-179. Hampshire: Ashgate.
-
Goddard, Nancy (1995). “Spirituality as Integrative Energy: A Philosophical Analysis as Requisite Precursor to Holistic Practice” in Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22 (4), 808-815.
-
Gottlieb, Alma (2006). “Ethnography: Theory and Methods” in Perecman, Ellen and Curran, Sara (Eds.) A Handbook for Social Science Field Research: Essays and Bibliographic Sources on Research Design and Methods, 47-68. California: Sage.
-
Gölpınarlı, Abdülbaki (1999). Mevlana Celaleddin: Hayatı, Felsefesi, Eserleri [Mevlana Celaleddin: Life, Philosophy, Works]. Istanbul: Inkılap.
-
Gölpınarlı, Abdülbaki (2006). Mevlana’dan Sonra Mevlevilik [Mevleviye after Mevlana]. İstanbul: Inkılap.
-
Guest, Mathew (2007). “In Search of Spiritual Capital: The Spiritual as a Cultural Resource” in Flanagan, Kieran and Jupp, Peter (Eds.) A Sociology of Spirituality, 181-199. Hampshire: Ashgate.
-
Gür, Hande (2018). Contemporary Mevleviye in Turkey from the Perspective of New Religious Movements: “New Mevlevis” of Istanbul and Konya (Unpublished MSc Thesis). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/tezSorguSonucYeni.jsp.
-
Harmanşah, Rabia (2006). Facts, Meanings, and Cosmologies: Bektashi Responses to the Abolition of Religious Orders in 1925 (Unpublished MSc Thesis). Retrieved from METU Theses Archive, VII.MES, 06-5.
-
Heelas, Paul (2002). “The Spiritual Revolution: From Religion to Spirituality” in Woodhead, Linda (Ed.) Religions in the Modern World: Traditions and Transformations, 357-375. London: Routledge.
-
Heelas, Paul (2008). Spiritualties of Life: New Age Romanticism and Consumptive Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Heelas, Paul and Woodhead, Linda (2005). The Spiritual Revolution: Why Religion is Giving Way to Spirituality. Oxford: Blackwell.
-
Hill, Joseph (2019). “Sufism Between Past and Modernity” in Woodward, Mark and Lukens-Bull Ronald (Eds.) Handbook of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Lives, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73653-2_9-1.
-
Holmes, Peter (2005). Becoming More Human: Exploring the Interface of Spirituality, Discipleship and Therapeutic Faith Community. Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
-
Holmes, Peter (2007). “Chapter 1: Spirituality: Some Disciplinary Perspectives” in Flanagan, Kieran and Jupp, Peter (Eds.) A Sociology of Spirituality, 23-42. Hampshire: Ashgate.
-
Mevlana Foundation (2018). Mevlevi Order. Retrieved from http://mevlanafoundation.com/.
-
Kara, Mustafa (2006). Tasavvuf ve Tarikatlar Tarihi [History of Sufism and Islamic Religious Orders]. Istanbul: Dergah Yayınları.
-
Kara, İsmail (2008). Cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde Bir Mesele Olarak İslam 1 [Islam as an Issue in Republic of Turkey] (2nd ed.). Istanbul: Dergah Yayınları.
-
Kongar, Emre (1999). “Niyazi Berkes’te Çağdaslasma Kavramı” [Modernization Notion in Niyazi Berkes] in Doğu Akdeniz Üniversitesi Kıbrıs Araştırmaları Merkezi, KKTC: Niyazi Berkes Sempozyumu, 21-23 April. Retrieved form https://www.kongar.org/makaleler/mak_ni.php.
-
Lewis, Franklin D. (2014). Rumi: Past and Present, East and West, The Life, Teachings, and Poetry of Jalâl al-Din Rumi (ebook ed.). London: Oneworld Publications.
-
Mardin, Şerif (1983). Din ve İdeoloji (2nd ed.). Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
-
Mardin, Şerif (2011). Türkiye, İslam ve Sekülerizim: Makaleler 5 [Turkey, Islam and Secularism: Articles 5]. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
-
Özdalga, Elisabeth (2010). İslamcılığın Türkiye Seyri: Sosyolojik Bir Perspektif [Course of Pan-Islamism in Turkey: A Sociological Perspective]. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
-
Porterfield, Amanda (2001). The Transformation of American Religion: The Story of a Late Twentieth-Century Awakening. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Roof, Wade Clark (2009). “Spiritual Seeking in the United States: Report on a Panel Study” in Archives de Sciences Sociales des religions, 109/Janvier-mars 2000, August, 49-66. DOI: 10.4000/assr.174.
-
Sayarı, Binnaz (1978). “Türkiye’de Dinin Denetim İşlevi” [Control Function of Religion in Turkey] in S. B. F. D., 33(1-2), 173-185.
-
Schimmel, Annemarie (2012). İslamın Mistik Boyutları [Mystic Dimensions of Islam] (2nd ed.). Istanbul: Kabalcı.
-
Sheldrake, Philip (1999). “Spirituality as an Academic Discipline” in Thatcher, Adrian (Ed.) Spirituality and the Curriculum, 55-78. London: Cassell.
-
Smith, Christian with Denton, Melinda (2005). Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers. New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Toprak, Binnaz (2010). “Neden Endişeliyim?” [Why am I Worried?] in Radikal, October, 1024040. Retrieved from http://www.radikal.com.tr/yazarlar/binnaz-toprak/neden-endiseliyim-1024040/.
-
Unat, Kadri (2012). “Onikinci Bölüm: Atatürk Sonrası Türkiye” [Twelfth Chapter: Turkey after Atatürk] in Ertan, Temuçin Faik (Ed.) Başlangıcından Günümüze Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Tarihi, 259-300. Ankara: Siyasal Kitapevi.
-
Varga, Ivan (2007). “Georg Simmel: Religion and Spirituality” in Flanagan, Kieran and Jupp, Peter (Eds.) A Sociology of Spirituality, 145-159. Hampshire: Ashgate.
-
Wuthnow, Robert (2003). All in Sync: How Music and Art Are Revitalizing American Religion. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
-
Zinnbauer, Brian, Pargament, Kenneth et al. (1997) “Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the Fuzzy” in Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36/December, 549-564.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 967 | 166 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 106 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 201 | 21 | 0 |
Spiritual but not Religious?
New Mevlevis of Contemporary Mevleviye in Turkey
In: Journal of Empirical TheologySearch for other papers by Hande Gür in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Mevleviye as an Islamic religious order is established in Anatolia after the passing of Mevlana Celaleddin-i Rumi in the 13th century. Based on bigger ethnographic research, this paper tries to delve into the distinction between spiritual and religious from the perspective of new Mevlevis of contemporary Mevleviye in Turkey. The authenticity of new Mevlevis’ standpoint while defining themselves as spiritual but not religious reflects the effects of modernization and individualization in Turkey as well as Mevleviye’s particular approach to spirituality. This reflection seems to reveal the flaws of Western definitions of the spiritual that is often presented as a contrary notion to being religious. Besides offering a discussion on the case of new Mevlevis’ understanding of spiritual and religious, this paper also argues that spirituality has to be studied empirically and defined in regards to its context and culture rather than as an essentially contrasting notion to being religious.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 967 | 166 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 106 | 7 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 201 | 21 | 0 |