Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Henry Wheaton, History of the Law of Nations in Europe and America (New York: Gould, Banks & Co., 1845), p. 269.
William Edward Hall, A Treatise on International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924), pp. 143–144; T. J. Lawrence, The Principles of International Law (London: MacMillan 1895), p. 129.
Henry Bonfils and Paul Fauchille, Manuel de droit international public (Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1908), p. 43.
Robert Redslob, Histoire des grands principes du droit des gens (Paris: Librairie Arthur Rousseau, 1923), p. 237.
See The Treaty of Utrecht, 31 March 1713, in George Chalmers, A Collection of Treaties between Great Britain and other Powers (London: 1790), p. 340, at 348. The Treaty of Utrecht ended the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–1714). It consists of a series of separate agreements, declarations, statements, and renunciations that several times refer to ‘a balance’, an ‘equal weight of power’, and ‘an immovable balance to maintain the equilibrium’ of Europe.
See Arthur Nussbaum, A Concise History of the Law of Nations (New York: The MacMillan Co., 1954), p. 165.
See Simon Schama, Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution (London: Penguin, 1989), pp. 235–236.
Sharon Korman, The Right of Conquest: The Acquisition of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), p. 75.
Stiles, ibid., p. 83.
Stiles, ibid., pp. 83–84.
Korman, ibid., pp. 76–77 quoting Acton.
Horn, ibid., p. 7 citing Papers of George iii, ed. Fortescue, Vol. ii, p. 428.
Horn, ibid., p. 8 citing Sandwich Papers, eds. Barnes and Owen (Navy Records Society). Vol. i, pp. 30–31.
See James H. Hutson, ‘The Partition Treaty and the Declaration of American Independence’, The Journal of American History Vol. 58 (1972), p. 877, for the full story. See also, David Armitage, ‘The Declaration of Independence and International Law’, The William and Mary Quarterly Vol. 59 (2002), p. 39, at 47.
Huston, ibid., p. 886; Armitage, ibid., p. 47.
Huston, ibid., p. 892 quoting James Curtis Ballagh (ed.), The Letters of Richard Henry Lee, i, pp. 176–178.
Huston, ibid., p. 895 quoting Moncure Daniel Conway (ed.), The Writings of Thomas Paine, i, pp. 204–205.
Andrzej Walicki, The Age of Enlightenment and the Birth of Modern Nationhood: Polish Political Thought from Noble Republicanism to Tadeusz Kosciuszko (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1989), pp. 11–12.
Rousseau, ibid., p. 269.
Rousseau, ibid., pp. 159–274.
See Jerzy Lukowski, ‘Recasting Utopia: Montesquieu, Rousseau and the Polish Constitution of 3 May 1791’, The Historical Journal Vol. 37 (1994), p. 65, at 71.
See Martyn Lyons, Post-Revolutionary Europe, 1815–1856 (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2006), pp. 42 (Austria banned the works of Rousseau, Goethe and Schiller), 45 (Lombadry-Venetia banned the works of Rousseau, Diderot, Voltaire, Macchiavelli, Alfieri and Foscolo), and 53 (a cultural quarantine was imposed on Russia to prevent Western ideas from ‘contaminating’ the minds of Russians).
See Karma Nabulsi, Traditions of War: Occupation, Resistance, and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 217, citing several Polish sources.
Nabulsi, ibid., p. 213. There is a statue of Kościuszko on a pedestal at the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. Kościuszko designed the defences of the West Point garrison.
Nabulsi, ibid., pp. 213–214.
Lukowski, ibid., p. 179.
Ibid., p. 180.
Ibid., p. 176.
Brun, ibid., pp. 251–254.
Lukowski, ibid., p. 255.
Quoted in Miecislaus Haiman, ‘American Influences on Kosciuszko’s Act of Insurrection’, Polish-American Studies 3 (1946), p. 1.
See James Brown Scott, ‘Poland’, The American Journal of International Law Vol. 11 (1917), p. 140.
As noted in Andreas Osiander, The States System of Europe, 1640–1990: Peacemaking and the Conditions of International Stability (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), p. 174.
Robert Phillimore, Commentaries upon International Law (Philadelphia: T. & J. Johnson, 1854), p. 327.
Gentz, ibid., pp. 80–81.
See Talleyrand, ibid., p. 102.
Ibid., p. 80.
See G. Starushenko, The Principle of National Self-Determination in Soviet Foreign Policy (Moscow: Foreign Language Publishing House, 1962), p. 55.
Kevin B. Anderson, Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non-Western Societies (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010), p. 56.
See Alfred Cobban, National Self-Determination (London: Oxford University Press, 1944), p. 12. Arno J. Mayer, Wilson vs. Lenin: Political Origins of the New Diplomacy 1917–1918 (New York: The World Publishing Co. Meridan Books, 1963), p. 298; Derek Heater, National Self-Determination: Woodrow Wilson and His Legacy (London: MacMillan, 1994), pp. 36–37.
See Umozurike Oji Umozurike, Self-Determination in International Law (London: Archon Books, 1972), p. 3.
See James Brown Scott (ed.), President Wilson’s Foreign Policy: Messages, Addresses, Papers (New York: Oxford University Press, 1918), pp. 364–373 at 371.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 804 | 163 | 9 |
Full Text Views | 275 | 11 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 109 | 25 | 3 |
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 804 | 163 | 9 |
Full Text Views | 275 | 11 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 109 | 25 | 3 |