Save

Human Rights for and against Empire – Legal and Public Discourses in the Age of Decolonisation

In: Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d'histoire du droit international
Author:
Fabian Klose Leibniz Institute of European History Mainz Germany klose@ieg-mainz.de

Search for other papers by Fabian Klose in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€43.34€34.95 excl. VAT

Against the background of an ongoing debate about the role of human rights in the age of decolonisation this essay approaches the issue from two different angles. It concentrates on the paradoxical situation that anti-colonial movements as well as colonial powers instrumentalised international human rights documents such as the Genocide Convention, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Geneva Conventions, and the European Conventions on Human Rights for achieving their political goals. In combining legal and public discourses in a significant way both sides accused each other of gross human rights violations while at the same time presenting themselves as respecting and even guaranteeing fundamental human rights. Especially during the course of the wars of decolonisation after 1945 this phenomenon became obvious in various diplomatic debates at the United Nations and made universal rights a diplomatic pawn in international debates.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 720 126 11
Full Text Views 376 43 3
PDF Views & Downloads 338 107 8