Save

The Origins of Regional Ideas: International Law, External Legitimization and Latin America’s ‘legalismo’

In: Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d'histoire du droit international
Author:
Nicole Jenne Associate Professor, Institute of Political Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

Search for other papers by Nicole Jenne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7114-3146
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Latin American politics are widely characterized by legalismo: a set of practices that can be traced to the notion of a continental or regional, American or Latin American International Law (AIL/LAIL) including the American international congresses and treaties, the practice of invoking AIL/LAIL’s various principles, and the use of judicial and quasi-judicial means of conflict resolution. However, it is far less clear where the origins of Latin America’s legalismo culture lay. Moreover, why did this formalistic-legalistic culture not take root in other regions? The article uses an original comparative historical approach to show that legalismo was a product of two conditions unique to Latin America: the distinctive security needs of its newly independent states and the time of independence. In comparison with Southeast Asia and Africa, I argue that legalismo was central to Latin America’s regional idea but that the practical impact of international law was not stronger than elsewhere.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 813 167 17
Full Text Views 67 15 1
PDF Views & Downloads 164 28 3