A real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based protocol (Gloco-PCR) was validated to specifically detect Gryllus locorojo, a Gryllus species on the European market often mistaken for Gryllus assimilis. Whereas the latter species is allowed in the EU for feeding farmed animals, G. locorojo is only permitted for pets according to the current legislation. The method was developed on the basis of the cytochrome oxidase I gene, (COI), which was sequenced with thoroughly characterised G. locorojo and G. assimilis samples. The method is highly sensitive, detecting 0.8 pg G. locorojo-DNA or 0.1% G. locorojo incurred in feed, respectively. Authentic G. assimilis specimens were used to ensure that the G. locorojo method (Gloco-PCR) discriminates this closely related sister taxon, with a comfortable Ct-difference of 10-15. For cross analysis of true G. assimilis, similar primers with another probe were employed (Gassim-PCR) and the annealing temperature was increased from 60 °C to 62 °C. Under these conditions, authentic G. assimilis crickets were detectable with Ct-values around 20, while G. locorojo samples showed a low detection at cycles around Ct 35. An investigation of ten ‘G. assimilis’ samples collected from Germany and four other European countries revealed that all of them were of the G. locorojo type. This proves the usefulness of our approach and supports the assumption that many G. assimilis crickets marketed in the EU indeed belong to the species G. locorojo. Consequently, European legislation, currently based on a white list of allowed insect species, is critically questioned.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bánki, O., Roskov, Y., Döring, M., Ower, G., Hernández Robles, D.R., Plata Corredor, C.A., Stjernegaard Jeppesen, T., Örn, A., Vandepitte, L., Hobern, D., Schalk, P., DeWalt, R.E., Keping, M., Miller, J., Orrell, T., Aalbu, R., Abbott, J., Adlard, R., Adriaenssens, E.M., et al., 2023. Catalogue of life checklist (Version 2023-07-18). Catalogue of Life, Leiden, the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.48580/dfsy (Accessed August 10, 2023).
Benchling, 2024. [Biology Software]. Available at: https://benchling.com
Cigliano, M.M., Braun, H., Eades, D.C. and Otte, D., 2024. Orthoptera species file version 5.0/5.0. Available at: http://orthoptera.speciesfile.org/ (Accessed August 19, 2024).
Daniso, E., Tulli, F., Cardinaletti, G., Cerri, R. and Tibaldi, E., 2020. Molecular approach for insect detection in feed and food: the case of Gryllodes sigillatus. European Food Research and Technology 246: 2373-2381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03573-1
EFSA, 2015. Risk profile related to production and consumption of insects as food and feed. EFSA Journal 13: 4257. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4257
ENGL, 2015. Definition of minimum performance requirements for analytical methods of GMO testing. Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. and Vrijenhoek, R., 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294-299.
Garino, C., Zagon, J. and Nesic, K., 2021. Novel real-time PCR protocol for the detection of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) in feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 280: 115057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115057
GBIF.org, 2024. GBIF home page. Available at: https://www.gbif.org (Accessed August 19, 2024).
Giusti, A., Spatola, G., Mancini, S., Nuvoloni, R. and Armani, A., 2024. Novel foods, old issues: metabarcoding revealed mislabeling in insect-based products sold by e-commerce on the EU market. Food Research International 184: 114268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114268
International Organization for Standardization, 2013. Foodstuffs – methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products – nucleic acid extraction (ISO 21571:2005 + Amd 1:2013). CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
Kibbe, W.A., 2007. OligoCalc: an online oligonucleotide properties calculator. Nucleic Acids Res 35: W43-W46. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm234
Koppel, R., Schum, R., Habermacher, M., Sester, C., Piller, L.E., Meissner, S. and Pietsch, K., 2019. Multiplex real-time PCR for the detection of insect DNA and determination of contents of Tenebrio molitor, Locusta migratoria and Achaeta domestica in food. European Food Research and Technology 245: 559-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-018-03225-5
Makkar, H.P.S., Tran, G., Henzé, V. and Ankers, P., 2014. State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 197: 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.07.008
Meiklejohn, K.A., Wallman, J.F. and Dowton, M., 2011. DNA-based identification of forensically important Australian Sarcophagidae (Diptera). International Journal of Legal Medicine 125: 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-009-0395-y
Monarch, 2023. Available at: https://monarch.calacademy.org/collections/harvestparams.php (Accessed August 23, 2024).
NCBI, n.d. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda, MD, USA. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (Accessed August 10, 2024).
Nelson, L.A., Wallman, J.F. and Dowton, M., 2007. Using COI barcodes to identify forensically and medically important blowflies. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 21: 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2007.00664.x
Palumbi, S., Martin, A., Romano, S., McMillan, W.S., Stice, S.L., Grabowski, G., Martin, A.P. and McMillan, W., 1991. Simple fool’s guide to PCR. ScienceOpen, Inc., Lexingtom. MA, USA. Available at: https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=a639c634-f566-4be6-98e4-2df5e05e0a2f
Park, D.S., Foottit, R., Maw, E. and Hebert, P.D., 2011. Barcoding bugs: DNA-based identification of the true bugs (Insecta: Hemiptera: Heteroptera). PLOS ONE 6: e18749. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018749
Ratnasingham, S. and Hebert, P.D., 2007. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355-364.
Regulation (EC) 152/2009, Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009, laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed. Official Journal of the European Union L54: 1-130.
Regulation (EC) 999/2001, Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. Official Journal of the European Union L147: 1.
Regulation (EU) 2017/893, Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/893 of 24 May 2017 amending Annexes I and IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Annexes X, XIV and XV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 as regards the provisions on processed animal protein. Official Journal of the European Union L138: 92-116.
Regulation (EC) 142/2011, Comission Regulation (EC) No 142/2011of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive Text with EEA relevance.
Rose, S.D., Owczarzy, R., Dobosy, J.R. and Behlke, M.A., 2013. Oligonucleotide primers and probes: use of chemical modifications to increase or decrease the specificity of qPCR. In: Saunders, N.A. and Lee, M.A. (eds.) Real-time PCR: advanced technologies and applications. Caister Academi Press, UK, pp. 171-198.
Rothbart, M.M. and Hennig, R.M., 2012. The Steppengrille (Gryllus spec./assimilis): selective filters and signal mismatch on two time scales. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043975
Sánchez-Muros, M.J., Barroso, F.G. and Manzano-Agugliaro, F., 2014. Insect meal as renewable source of food for animal feeding: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production 65: 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.068
Shestakov, L. and Vedenina, V.Y., 2012. A problem of taxonomic status of “banana cricket” from culture of the Moscow Zoo insectarium. Entomological Review 92: 262-270.
ThermoFisher, 2023. ThermoFisher multiple primer analyzer web tool. Thermo Fisher Scientific GmbH, Waltham, MA, USA.
Tramuta, C., Gallina, S., Bellio, A., Bianchi, D.M., Chiesa, F., Rubiola, S., Romano, A. and Decastelli, L., 2018. A set of multiplex polymerase chain reactions for genomic detection of nine edible insect species in foods. Journal of Insect Science 18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey087
van Raamsdonk, L., van der Fels-Klerx, H. and de Jong, J., 2017. New feed ingredients: the insect opportunity. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A 34: 1384-1397.
Weissman, D.B., 2009. G. multipulsator n. sp. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 103: 375.
Weissman, D.B. and Gray, D.A., 2019. Crickets of the genus Gryllus in the United States (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllinae). Zootaxa 4705: 1-277. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4705.1.1
Weissman, D.B., Gray, D.A., Pham, H.T. and Tijssen, P., 2012. Billions and billions sold: pet-feeder crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), commercial cricket farms, an epizootic densovirus, and government regulations make for a potential disaster. Zootaxa: 67-88.
Weissman, D.B., Walker, T.J. and Gray, D.A., 2009. The field cricket Gryllus assimilis and two new sister species (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 102: 367-380. https://di.org/10.1603/008.102.0304
You, Y., Moreira, B.G., Behlke, M.A. and Owczarzy, R., 2006. Design of LNA probes that improve mismatch discrimination. Nucleic Acids Research 34: e60. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl175
Zagon, J., Schmidt, J., Schmidt, A.S., Broll, H., Lampen, A., Seidler, T. and Braeuning, A., 2017. A novel screening approach based on six real-time PCR systems for the detection of crustacean species in food. Food Control 79: 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.03.019
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 253 | 254 | 173 |
Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 33 | 7 |
A real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based protocol (Gloco-PCR) was validated to specifically detect Gryllus locorojo, a Gryllus species on the European market often mistaken for Gryllus assimilis. Whereas the latter species is allowed in the EU for feeding farmed animals, G. locorojo is only permitted for pets according to the current legislation. The method was developed on the basis of the cytochrome oxidase I gene, (COI), which was sequenced with thoroughly characterised G. locorojo and G. assimilis samples. The method is highly sensitive, detecting 0.8 pg G. locorojo-DNA or 0.1% G. locorojo incurred in feed, respectively. Authentic G. assimilis specimens were used to ensure that the G. locorojo method (Gloco-PCR) discriminates this closely related sister taxon, with a comfortable Ct-difference of 10-15. For cross analysis of true G. assimilis, similar primers with another probe were employed (Gassim-PCR) and the annealing temperature was increased from 60 °C to 62 °C. Under these conditions, authentic G. assimilis crickets were detectable with Ct-values around 20, while G. locorojo samples showed a low detection at cycles around Ct 35. An investigation of ten ‘G. assimilis’ samples collected from Germany and four other European countries revealed that all of them were of the G. locorojo type. This proves the usefulness of our approach and supports the assumption that many G. assimilis crickets marketed in the EU indeed belong to the species G. locorojo. Consequently, European legislation, currently based on a white list of allowed insect species, is critically questioned.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 253 | 254 | 173 |
Full Text Views | 12 | 12 | 4 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 33 | 33 | 7 |