Revealing What’s Implicit

Maimonides’ Account of Creation and Revelation beyond Naturalism and Politics

In: The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy
Author: Paul E. Nahme1
View More View Less
  • 1 Brown University
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



This article reinterprets Maimonides’ theory of creation and revelation by focusing upon the relationship between belief in creation and the affirmation of miracle and law described in Guide II:25. Focusing upon Maimonides’ use of inference to describe creation and revelation, I re-evaluate Maimonides’ account as an instance of inferential reasoning. That is, Maimonides makes use of, rather than proves, the implicit norms of creation and revelation in their explicit function of legal reasoning. Thus, I suggest that Maimonides’ emphasis upon inferential judgment in justifying law is a defense of creation and revelation as rules of reasoning.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 319 47 1
Full Text Views 184 5 1
PDF Views & Downloads 51 10 3