The article presents the intricacies of an intra-Islamic debate within Europe today discussing multiple Islamic perspectives of religion, the state and the law. Analyzing the ideas of four contemporary European Muslim intellectuals the article reveals variations on how Muslims in Europe view the concept of secularism, the role of the state and the guidelines of Islamic religious practice. Through a comparative discourse analysis the article identities four distinct Islamic discourses that are compared and contrasted with each other and juxtaposed with European theory about religion, the state and the law.
As Muslims in Europe gradually overcome social cleavages and ethnic differences they at times challenge the secular nature and religious neutrality of Europe’s religious, cultural and humanist inheritance. Understanding the distinctions between the Islamic discourses elaborates the trends and ramifications the political mobilization Muslims living in Europe might have on the status quo definitions of European society; some Islamic discourses represent a direct confrontation to the construct secular identity; others suggest full integration into European society. All four are present in Europe today. Recognizing the differences between the Islamic discourses can rearrange the principles in which Europe perceives Islam while enlightening the politically sensitive and complex subject relating to the formation of an Islamic European identity.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Peggy Levitt, “An Approach to the Study of Transnational Religion”, Transnational Migration: comparative Perspectives. (2001), 1-13.
Jonathan Fox, “Separation of Religion and State in Stable Christian Democracies: Fact or Myth?” International Conference on Religious Law and State Affairs, (2011), 14-17.
The PEW Forum. 2011. “The Future of the Global Muslim Population”. Retreived December 14, 2011. http://features.pewforum.org/muslim-population/.
John Bowen, “Beyond Migration: Islam as a Transnational Public Space”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 30( 5) (2004), 879-894.
Shaul Mishal and Ilan Talmud, “The Network State: Triangular Relations in Middle Easter Politics”, International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 37 (2), (October, 2000), 176-177.
William Galston, “On secularism & religion - Jews, Muslims & the prospects for pluralism”, Daedalus : Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 132 (3) (2003), 73.
Andrew Taylor, “Hollowing out or Filling in? Taskforces and the Management of Cross-cutting Issues in British Government”, British Journal of Political and International Relations 2(1) (April, 2000).
Raphaël Liogier, “Islam: A Scapegoat for Europe’s Decadence.” Harvard International Review. (2011).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 522 | 208 | 60 |
Full Text Views | 71 | 3 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 38 | 4 | 0 |
The article presents the intricacies of an intra-Islamic debate within Europe today discussing multiple Islamic perspectives of religion, the state and the law. Analyzing the ideas of four contemporary European Muslim intellectuals the article reveals variations on how Muslims in Europe view the concept of secularism, the role of the state and the guidelines of Islamic religious practice. Through a comparative discourse analysis the article identities four distinct Islamic discourses that are compared and contrasted with each other and juxtaposed with European theory about religion, the state and the law.
As Muslims in Europe gradually overcome social cleavages and ethnic differences they at times challenge the secular nature and religious neutrality of Europe’s religious, cultural and humanist inheritance. Understanding the distinctions between the Islamic discourses elaborates the trends and ramifications the political mobilization Muslims living in Europe might have on the status quo definitions of European society; some Islamic discourses represent a direct confrontation to the construct secular identity; others suggest full integration into European society. All four are present in Europe today. Recognizing the differences between the Islamic discourses can rearrange the principles in which Europe perceives Islam while enlightening the politically sensitive and complex subject relating to the formation of an Islamic European identity.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 522 | 208 | 60 |
Full Text Views | 71 | 3 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 38 | 4 | 0 |