Save

Civil Liability for Sex Abuse by Muslim Clergy in Spain

In: Journal of Law, Religion and State
Author:
Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar LLM (LSE), PhD (Navarra), Associate Professor KIMEP University, Almaty, Kazakhstan, nicolaszambranatevar@hotmail.com, n.zambrana@kimep.kz

Search for other papers by Nicolás Zambrana-Tévar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

Abstract

State courts of civil law and common law jurisdictions alike are used to applying the rules of direct and indirect tort liability to Christian churches in different ways and with different results. But recent court decisions have put the issue of the civil liability of religious groups for acts of sex abuse by clergy in a different context, that of Islam. A common denominator in the reasoning of courts worldwide is the relevance of religious authority – authority to appoint and supervise clergy or authority vested in clergy – as an important factor in the attribution of civil liability. But Islam is a religion whose organizational structure and ministers are simply too different from those of the various Christian churches, so that state courts run the risk of wrongly applying to Islamic communities and Muslim entities the same categories and legal principles they usually apply in other, more common, cases of sex abuse.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 586 199 83
Full Text Views 19 2 1
PDF Views & Downloads 27 4 0