Smallholders and Farmworkers in Agricultural Value Chains: No Upgrading Without Collective Action and State Support
In: Journal of Labor and SocietySearch for other papers by Ismail Doga Karatepe in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Christoph Scherrer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article presents findings from field studies of smallholders and farmworkers producing coffee, mangoes, and rice in several countries in the global South. It is one of the few comparative studies of the constraints and opportunities for social upgrading in global agricultural value chains (gvcs). We argue that the ease with which new suppliers can be found gives highly concentrated global wholesalers and retailers enormous leverage over smallholders. As a result, opportunities for social upgrading tend to be limited. Even in successful cases, it is accompanied by fewer employment opportunities. Cooperatives, which enjoy government support and enforced labor laws, are an exception. The article begins with a discussion of problems in measuring the impact of gvc participation and a theoretical explanation of why economic upgrading is not sufficient to ensure social upgrading. Special attention is given to the role of the state in promoting social upgrading.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Barrett, C.B., M.E. Bachke, M.F. Bellemare, H.C. Michelson, S. Narayanan and T.F. Walker. “Smallholder participation in contract farming: Comparative evidence from five countries”. World Development 40 (4) (2012), 715–730.
-
Barrientos, S., G. Gereffi. and A. Rossi. “Economic and social upgrading in global production networks: A new paradigm for a changing world”. International Labour Review 150 (3-4)(2011), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2011.00119.x.
-
Bellemare, M.F. and J.R. Bloem. “Does contract farming improve welfare? A review”. World Development 112 (2018), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.018.
-
Besky, S. “Can a Plantation be Fair? Paradoxes and Possibilities in Fair Trade Darjeeling Tea Certification”. Anthropology of Work Review 29 (1) (2008), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1417.2008.00006.x.
-
Besky, S. The Darjeeling distinction: Labor and Justice on Fair-trade Tea Plantations in India (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2014).
-
Bryman, A. Social Research Methods, 4th rev. edn. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2012).
-
Chi, D.Q., D. Hawkins, B. Benzaquen Perosa, S. Verma, I.D. Karatepe and C. Scherrer. “Economic and social upgrading in coffee vc in comparative perspective”. In The Phantom of Upgrading in Agricultural Supply Chains: A Cross-Country, Cross-Crop Comparison of Smallholders, eds. I.D. Karatepe and C. Scherrer (Baden Baden: Nomos, 2021), pp. 111–173.
-
Cramer, C., D. Johnston, C. Oya and J. Sender. Fairtrade, Employment and Poverty Reduction in Ethiopia and Uganda. (2014), available online at http://ftepr.org/wp-content/uploads/FTEPR-Final-Report-19-May-2014-FINAL.pdf.
-
Evers, B., M. Opondo, S. Barrientos, A. Krishnan and F. Amoding, F. Global and regional supermarkets: Implications for producers and workers in Kenyan and Ugandan horticulture. Capturing the gains working paper: Vol. 39 (Manchester: University of Manchester, 2014).
-
fao. The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. (Rome: Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2017), available online at www.fao.org/3/a-i6583e.pdf.
-
Food and Agriculture Organization (fao) (2020). “Global trade in food and agricultural products more than doubles in last two decades”. Available online at http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/1309369/icode/ (accessed 30 September 2020).
-
Felsted, A. “Supermarkets: Schemes to help developing world smallholders”. Financial Times (2010), available online at https://www.ft.com/content/86a5cb8c-d65a-11df-81f0-00144feabdc0.
-
Gonzalez‐Perez, M.‐A. and S. Gutierrez‐Viana, S. “Cooperation in coffee markets: The case of Vietnam and Colombia”. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies 2 (1) (2012), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/20440831211219237.
-
Horner, R. “Beyond facilitator? State roles in global VCs and global production networks”. Geography Compass 11 (2) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12307.
-
Hossain, J., M. Kumar and I.D. Karatepe (2021). “Smallholders in the rice vc of Bangladesh and India”. In The Phantom of Upgrading in Agricultural Supply Chains: A Cross-Country, Cross-Crop Comparison of Smallholderseds. I.D. Karatepe and C. Scherrer (Baden Baden: Nomos, 2021), pp. 25–90.
-
International Labour Office (ilo) (2017). Decent and productive work in agriculture: Decent work in the rural economy policy guidance notes. Available online at http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_policy/documents/publication/wcms_437173.pdf.
-
Johnson, N.L. and J.A. Berdegue (2004). Property rights, collective action and agribusiness. Available online at https://www.ifpri.org/publication/property-rights-collective-action-and-agribusiness.
-
Kapsos, S. and E. Bourmpoula. Employment and economic class in the developing world. ILO research paper no. 6. (ILO, Geneva, 2013), 14, 279.
-
Karatepe, I.D. and C. Scherrer, C., eds. The Phantom of Upgrading in Agricultural Supply Chains: A Cross-Country, Cross-Crop Comparison of Smallholders (Baden Baden: Nomos, 2021).
-
Lutz, C. and M. Olthaar. “Global value chains and smallholders in Sub-Saharan Africa”. Review of Social Economy 75 (3) (2017), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2017.1357321.
-
Mehdi, M., A. Burhan, P. Thales, B. Walter, V. Apolinário and I.D. Karatepe. “Economic and social upgrading in global agro-food value chainvc s: Mango in Brazil and Pakistan”. In The Phantom of Upgrading in Agricultural Supply Chains: A Cross-Country, Cross-Crop Comparison of Smallholderseds. I.D. Karatepe and C. Scherrer (Baden Baden: Nomos, 2021), pp. 174–226.
-
oecd-fao (2017). oecd-fao Agricultural Outlook 2017–2026. Available online at http://stats.oecd.org/viewhtml.aspx?datasetcode=HIGH_AGLINK_2017&lang=en.
-
Ragin, C.C. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2014).
-
Scherrer, C. and S. Verma, eds. Decent work deficits in southern agriculture: Measurements, drivers and strategies. Labor and globalization (Augsburg: Rainer Hampp Verlag, 2018).
-
Swain, B.B. “Contract farming and Indian agriculture: Can agribusiness help the small farmer?” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (3) (2016), 285–297.
-
Taglioni, D. and D. Winkler (2016). Making global value chains work for development. Available online at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/18421.
-
Willoughby, R. and T. Gore (2018). Ripe for Change: Ending human suffering in supermarket supply chains. Available online at https://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/ripe-for-change-ending-human-suffering-in-supermarket-supply-chains-620418.
-
The World Bank (2018). Agrabusiness and value chains. Available online at https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/agribusiness.
-
World Bank. World development report: Agriculture for Development (New York, NY and Washington DC: Oxford University Press and World Bank, 2007).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 976 | 277 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 32 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 18 | 1 |
Smallholders and Farmworkers in Agricultural Value Chains: No Upgrading Without Collective Action and State Support
In: Journal of Labor and SocietySearch for other papers by Ismail Doga Karatepe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Scherrer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article presents findings from field studies of smallholders and farmworkers producing coffee, mangoes, and rice in several countries in the global South. It is one of the few comparative studies of the constraints and opportunities for social upgrading in global agricultural value chains (gvcs). We argue that the ease with which new suppliers can be found gives highly concentrated global wholesalers and retailers enormous leverage over smallholders. As a result, opportunities for social upgrading tend to be limited. Even in successful cases, it is accompanied by fewer employment opportunities. Cooperatives, which enjoy government support and enforced labor laws, are an exception. The article begins with a discussion of problems in measuring the impact of gvc participation and a theoretical explanation of why economic upgrading is not sufficient to ensure social upgrading. Special attention is given to the role of the state in promoting social upgrading.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 976 | 277 | 26 |
| Full Text Views | 32 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 18 | 1 |
