Capitalising Precarity: Wellbeing of Migrants in Russia
In: Journal of Labor and SocietySearch for other papers by Rano Turaeva in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper aims to introduce the concept of capitalising precarity to analyse the situation of precarious migration in migrant unfriendly contexts such as Russia. The material analysed in this paper concerns welfare and health inequalities in Russia. Welfare of labour migrants in Russia (both for internal Russian migrants and for foreign migrants) is de facto non-existent and largely self-organised by migrants themselves. State migration policies of Russia as well as welfare policies in the destination countries (Central Asia) are formulated in papers but in practice do not function to ensure some kind of wellbeing and social protection. Working conditions both at home (in Central Asia) and in destination countries (Russia and Kazakhstan) do not comply with average requirements of wellbeing of workers. I was shocked but not surprised to see Central Asian migrant workers in winter cleaning the roofs of Russian houses without any protection. The paper analyses the situation of intermixing of legal and informal practices which have a direct implication for wellbeing of migrants in Russia. The working conditions in Russia for both migrant and non-migrant labour violate basic principles of human rights. The paper also shows that even citizenship does not automatically provide direct access to social welfare where the latter is bound to the permanent registration (propiska). Continuous precarity is capital for other actors such as those who can profit from it such as police officers or other migrants themselves. The findings of this research contribute to the broader literature of labour and welfare in terms challenging the boundaries between citizenship and mobility.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Agamben, G. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).
-
Arutyunova, E.M. “Adaptatsiya vremennyh trudovyh migrantov iz Srednej Azii na sel’skom Juge Rossii” [Adaptation of temporary labour migrants from Central Asia in the rural South of Russia]. Sociologicheskaya Nauka i Social’naya Praktika [Sociological science and social practice] 1(5) (2014), 51–70.
-
Beck, U. “Risk society revisited.” In The sociology of risk and gambling reader, ed. J. Cosgrave (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006), 61–83.
-
Bieler, A. and J. Salyga. “Baltic labour in the crucible of capitalist exploitation: Reassessing ‘post-communist’ transformation.” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 31(2) (2020), 191–210.
-
Burawoy, M. and K. Verdery, eds. Uncertain Transition: Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1999), 19–52.
-
Butler, J. “Performativity, Precarity and Sexual Politics.” aibr, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 4(3) (2009), i–xiii.
-
Cassel, D. and U. Cichy. “Explaining the Growing Shadow Economy in East and West: A Comparative System Approach.” Comparative Economy Studies 28 (1986), 20–41.
-
Castells, M. and A. Portes. “World underneath: the origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy.” In The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries, eds. A. Portes, M. Castells and L.A. Benton (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), 11–37.
-
Chen, M.A. 2012. The informal economy: definitions, theories, and policies. wiego Working Paper No. 1, Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (Cambridge: wiego, 2012), available online at http://www.wiego.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/Chen_WIEGO_WP1.pdf (accessed 15 February 2023).
-
Cieślewska, A. “From Shuttle Trader to Businesswomen.” In The Informal Post-Socialist Economy: Embedded Practices and Livelihoods, eds. J. Morris and A. Polese (New York, NY: Routledge, 2014), 50–121.
-
De Genova, N. “The Legal Production of Mexican/Migrant “Illegality.” Latino Studies 2(2) (2004), 160–185.
-
Flattery, D. and M. Schwartz. Haoma and Harmaline (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1989).
-
Fuller, L. “Russia’s hidden workers: the slaves of Dagestan.” The Guardian (7 October 2014), available online at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/07/slaves-russia-dagestan-brick-factories-escape (accessed 30 September 2022).
-
Grossman, G. “The ‘Second Economy’ of the ussr.” Problems of Communism 26(5) (1977), 25–40.
-
Han, C. “Precarity, precariousness, and vulnerability”. Annual Review of Anthropology 47 (2018), 331–343.
-
Hart, K. “Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana.” Journal of Modern African Studies 11(1) (1973), 61–89.
-
Hart, K. “The informal economy.” Cambridge Anthropology 10(2) (1985), 54–58.
-
Hart, K. Formal bureaucracy and the emergent forms of the informal economy (Helsinki: wider, 2005).
-
Hart, K. Between bureaucracy and the people: a political history of informality. diis Working paper (Copenhagen: diis, 2008).
-
Humphrey, C. “Traders, ‘disorder’, and citizenship regimes in provincial Russia.” In Uncertain transition: Ethnographies of change in the postsocialist world, eds. M. Burawoy and K. Verdery (Oxford: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers, 1999), 19–52.
-
Kangas, A., Krivonos, D., Khidjobova, S., Omonillaeva, Z., Jitlina, O., Tereshkina, A. & Kiromova, M. (2023). “Social Reproduction of Post‐Soviet Migrant Labour: Braiding the International Political Economy.” Antipode 55(1), 156–179.
-
Ledeneva, A.V. Russia’s Economy of Favours: Blat, Networking, and Informal Exchange. (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
-
Ledeneva, A.V. How Russia Really Works: Informal Practices in the 1990s (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).
-
Ledeneva, A.V. (2013) Can Russia Modernize? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).
-
Lin, J., and M.T.N. Nguyen. “The Cycle of Commodification: Migrant Labour, Welfare, and the Market in Global China and Vietnam.” Global Public Policy and Governance 1(3) (2021), 321–339.
-
MacGaffey, J. and R. Bazenguissa-Ganga. Congo-Paris: Transnational Traders on the Margins of the Law Transnational Traders on the Margins of the Law. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. 2000).
-
Markova, M. Living Through the Fall of Communism: Life Narratives of the Last Soviet Generation, Ph.D. Dissertation (Seattle, WA: University of Washington, 2010).
-
Mars, G. and Y. Altman. “The Cultural Bases of Soviet Georgia’s Second Economy.” Europe‐Asia Studies 35 (4) (1983), 546–560.
-
Meagher, K. “Trading on faith: religious movements and informal economic governance in Nigeria.” The Journal of Modern African Studies 47(3) (2009), 397–423.
-
Meagher, K. “The Politics of Vulnerability: Exit, Voice and Capture in Three Nigerian Informal Manufacturing Clusters.” In Africa’s Informal Workers: Collective Agency, Alliances and Transnational Organizing in Urban Africa, ed., I. Lindell (London: Zed Books; Uppsala: The Nordic Africa Institute, 2010).
-
Millar, K.M. “Toward a critical politics of precarity.” Sociology Compass 11(6) (2017), p.e12483.
-
Mukhina, I. “New Losses, New Opportunities: (Soviet) Women in the Shuttle Trade, 1987–1998.” Journal of Social History 43(2) (2009), 341–359.
-
Muldrew, C. The Economy of Obligation. (London: Macmillan, 1998).
-
Nazpary, J. Post-Soviet Chaos: Violence and Dispossession in Kazakhstan. (London: Pluto Press, 2002).
-
Neocleous, M. A critical theory of police power: The fabrication of the social order (London: Verso Books, 2021).
-
Parry, J.P. “Lords of labour: working and shirking in Bhilai.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 33(1–2) (1999), 107–140.
-
Pavlovskaya, M. “Precarious labour: Russias other transition.” In The Handbook of Diverse Economies, eds. J.K. Gibson-Graham and K. Dombroski (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020), 129–136.
-
Pohorila, N. and G. Korzhov. “Self-Identificat”ion in the Society of Crisis: A Case of Cross-Border Traders.” Naykovi Zapiski Kievo-Mogilians’koy Akademiy 19 (2001), 58–64.
-
Portes, A. and J. Böröcz. “The Informal Sector under Capitalism and State Socialism: A Preliminary Comparison.” Social Justice 15(3–4) (1988), 17–28.
-
Roitman, J. Fiscal Disobedience: An Anthropology of Economic Regulation in Central Africa. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).
-
Salyga, J. Why migrant farm workers are living four to a caravan in a time of social distancing (Brooklyn, NY: Jacobin, 2020).
-
Schiller, G. and N.B. Salazar. “Regimes of mobility across the globe.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 39(2) (2013), 183–200.
-
Standing, G. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. (London: Bloomsbury, 2011).
-
Tanzi, V. “Underground Economy and Tax Evasion in the United States: Estimates and Implication.” Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 32 (1980), 427–453.
-
Treml, V.G. and M.V. Alexeev. The Growth of the Second Economy in the Soviet Union and its Impact on the System. In The Postcommunist Economic Transformation, ed. R.W. Campbell (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1994), 221–248.
-
Turaeva, R. “Post-Soviet Uncertainties: Micro-orders of Central Asian Migrants in Russia.” Inner Asia 15(2) (2013), 273–292.
-
Turaeva, R. “Mobile Entrepreneurs in post-Soviet Central Asia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (1) (2014), 105–114, doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.02.001.
-
Turaeva, R. Imagined mosque communities in Russia: Central Asian migrants in Moscow, Asian Ethnicity, 20 (2) (2019), 131–147, doi: 10.1080/14631369.2018.1525529.
-
Turaeva, R. Propiska regime regulating mobility and migration in post-Soviet cities. Cities 121 (3) (2022), 103478, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103478.
-
Turaeva, R. and I. Amon. Deportation regimes in the post-Soviet space: Producing deportable migrants in the Russian Federation. In Labour, Mobility and Informal Practices in Russia, Central Asia and Eastern Europe (London: Routledge, 2021), 51–68.
-
Turaeva, R. and R. Urinboyev. Labour, Mobility and Informal Practices in Russia, Central Asia and Eastern Europe: Power, Institutions and Mobile Actors in Transnational Space (London: Routledge, 2021).
-
Urinboyev, R. “Establishing an “Uzbek Mahalla” via Smartphones and Social Media: Everyday Transnational Lives of Uzbek Labor Migrants in Russia.” In Constructing the Uzbek State: Narratives of Post-Soviet Years. ed. M. Laruelle (Boulder, CO: Lexington Books, 2017), 119–148.
-
Velikij, P.P. “Migranty iz stran yugo-vostochnyh regionov v rossijskom sele” [Migrants from South-Eastern regions in Russian rural areas] Istoricheskaja i social’no-obrazovatel’naja mysl’ [Historical and social and educational thought].” Krasnodar 8(2 Part 1) (2016), 76–86. (in Russian).
-
Żuk, P., P. Żuk and J. Lisiewicz-Jakubaszko. “Labour migration of doctors and nurses and the impact on the quality of health care in Eastern European countries: The case of Poland.” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 30(2) (2019), 307–320.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 655 | 344 | 29 |
| Full Text Views | 198 | 10 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 345 | 79 | 0 |
Capitalising Precarity: Wellbeing of Migrants in Russia
In: Journal of Labor and SocietySearch for other papers by Rano Turaeva in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This paper aims to introduce the concept of capitalising precarity to analyse the situation of precarious migration in migrant unfriendly contexts such as Russia. The material analysed in this paper concerns welfare and health inequalities in Russia. Welfare of labour migrants in Russia (both for internal Russian migrants and for foreign migrants) is de facto non-existent and largely self-organised by migrants themselves. State migration policies of Russia as well as welfare policies in the destination countries (Central Asia) are formulated in papers but in practice do not function to ensure some kind of wellbeing and social protection. Working conditions both at home (in Central Asia) and in destination countries (Russia and Kazakhstan) do not comply with average requirements of wellbeing of workers. I was shocked but not surprised to see Central Asian migrant workers in winter cleaning the roofs of Russian houses without any protection. The paper analyses the situation of intermixing of legal and informal practices which have a direct implication for wellbeing of migrants in Russia. The working conditions in Russia for both migrant and non-migrant labour violate basic principles of human rights. The paper also shows that even citizenship does not automatically provide direct access to social welfare where the latter is bound to the permanent registration (propiska). Continuous precarity is capital for other actors such as those who can profit from it such as police officers or other migrants themselves. The findings of this research contribute to the broader literature of labour and welfare in terms challenging the boundaries between citizenship and mobility.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 655 | 344 | 29 |
| Full Text Views | 198 | 10 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 345 | 79 | 0 |
