Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Due to its size and importance, the Mexican automobile industry was an important topic in negotiations for the usmca agreement. A particularly contentious issue was the allegation that foreign direct investment (fdi) in Mexican parts plants has been facilitated by autocratic unions affiliated with the Confederation of Mexican Workers (ctm). Although this issue has been widely noted, there has been little systematic research on the topic. In this paper, we seek to fill this gap in the literature. Using panel data, we examine the determinants of fdi in the automotive parts sector in Mexico’s 31 states and Mexico City (formerly df) from 2004 to 2018. The study makes four contributions to the literature. First, we demonstrate empirically that fdi in the sector concentrated in Mexican states with a higher lagged unionization rate. Second, controlling for the type of union organization, the study shows that fdi was positively associated with states where the ctm was already well-established in the automobile industry. Alternatively, fdi was negatively associated with states where independent and democratic unions had previously organized. Third, we clarify the conditions under which firms prefer pre-emptive unionization with the ctm to the alternative of union avoidance. Finally, the study points to the importance of education and transportation infrastructure in fdi decisions.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Álvarez Medina, M. “Cambios en la industria automotriz frente a la globalización: El sector de autopartes en México.” Contaduría y Administración 206 (2002), 29–49.
Ashby, N.J. and M.A. Ramos. “Foreign direct investment and industry response to organized crime: The Mexican case.” European Journal of Political Economy 30 (2013), 80–91, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.01.006.
Asociación Mexicana de la Industria Automotriz (amia). Plantas de ensamble de vehículos, motores y transmisiones de empresas asociadas (Mexico City: AMIA, 2020), available online at https://www.amia.com.mx/about/plantas_ensamble/
Asociación Mexicana de la Industria Automotriz (amia) (various years). Ubicación de las plantas. Machine readable map, available online at. https://www.amia.com.mx.
Beck, N. and J.N. Katz. “What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data.” American Political Science Review 89 (3) (1995), 634–647.
Beck, N. and J.N. Katz. “Modeling dynamics in time-series–cross-section political economy data.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 (2011), 331–352.
Bennett, D.C. and K.E. Sharpe. Transnational Corporations versus the State: The Political Economy of the Mexican Auto Industry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985).
Bensusán, G. and K.J. Middlebrook. “Cambio político desde afuera hacia adentro. Influencia comercial estadounidense y reforma de los derechos laborales en México.” Foro Internacional 60 (3) (2020), 985–1039.
Cantú, J.C.C., E.A. Ayala Gaytán and R. Cabral Torres. “¿Quién paga el impuesto sobre nóminas de los estados de México? Un análisis de incidencia económica.” Premio Nacional de Finanzas Públicas 6 (21) (2016), 69–112.
Carrillo, J. “Mujeres en la industria maquiladora de autopartes.” Working paper (Tijuana: Colegio de la Frontera Norte, 1988).
Carrillo J., O. Contreras and J. Estrada. “The Creation of Supplier Relations within Global Production Networks: The case of Ford Motor Company in Hermosillo, Mexico.” Actes du GERPISA 42 (2010), 23–39.
Carrillo, J. and M. Matus. “Will the Mexican auto parts maquilas be able to transit to I-4.0?” Paradigma económico. Revista de Economía Regional y Sectorial 12 (2) (2020), 39–61.
Casado Izquierdo, J.M. “La resiliencia de la industria automotriz mexicana ante la Covid-19.” Anales de Geografía de la Universidad Complutense 41 (1) (2021), 59–80.
Changkajonsakdi, B. and S. Kaewkuekool. “Development of soft skills learning management model for automotive parts industry in Thailand.” International Journal of Innovation and Learning 26 (4) (2019), 364–390.
Cota, J. “Educación, experiencia y especialización manufacturera en la frontera norte de México.” Comercio Exterior 52 (4) (2002), 300–308.
Cota, J. “The effects of agglomeration on the growth of the Mexican automobile assembly and auto parts subsectors.” Contaduría y administración 66 (1) (2021), 1–26.
Covarrubias, A. “The boom of the Mexican automotive industry: From NAFTA to usmca.” In New Frontiers of the Automobile Industry. Palgrave Studies of Internationalization in Emerging Markets, eds. A. Covarrubias and S. Ramírez Perez (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020), 323–348.
Covarrubias, A. and A. Bouzas Ortiz A. “Employment and trade union policies in the auto industry in Mexico.” In The Automotive Sector in Emerging Economies: Industrial Policies, Market Dynamics and Trade Unions, ed. R. Traub-Merz (Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2017), 163–186.
Crossa, M. “Contorting transformations: Uneven impacts of the US–Mexico automotive industrial complex.” Competition and Change 26 (5) (2021), 533–553.
Crossa, M. “Distorted linkages and labor devaluation: an exploration of automotive value chain-driven ‘development’ in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d’études du développement (2022), in press, DOI: 10.1080/02255189.2022.2058469.
De la Garza Toledo, E., ed. “La polémica acerca de la tasa de afiliación sindical revisada al 2010.” In La situación del trabajo en México 2012. El trabajo en la crisis (México: Plaza y Valdés and UAM, 2012), 453–472.
De la Rosa, L.M.V., L.A.V. Villarreal and J.B.G. Villegas. “Factors for manufacturing competitiveness of automotive part suppliers from Nuevo León, Mexico: A literature review.” In Proceedings of the European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. IEOM 2017 (Bristol: IEOM Society, 2017), 84–97, available online at https://www.ieomsociety.org/ieomuk/papers/29.pdf.
El Economista. “Noticias sobre impuesto sobre nómina” (2019), available online at https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/tags/impuesto-sobre-nomina.
Fleck, S. “A gender perspective on maquila employment and wages in Mexico.” In The Economics of Gender in Mexico Work, Family, State, and Market, eds. E. G. Katz and M.C. Correia (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2001), 133–169.
Frente Auténtico del Trabajo. Breve historia del FAT (Mexico City: FAT, 2010), available online at https://fatmexico.wordpress.com/2010/11/26/21/.
Gantz, D.A. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Labor rights and environmental protection (Houston, TX: Mexico Center, Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy, 2019), available online at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3404238.
Gauss, S. Made in Mexico: Regions, Nation, and the State in the Rise of Mexican Industrialism, 1920s–1940s (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010).
Gelman, A. and J. Hill. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Gutiérrez, D. “Sealed Power: Un caso de democracia obrera.” Caleidoscopio-Revista Semestral de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades 17 (2005), 55–70.
El Heraldo de Aguascalientes. ctmimpugnaría resultado en Nissan (24 September 2021), available online at https://www.heraldo.mx/ctm-impugnaria-resultado-en-nissan/.
Hathaway, D. Allies Across Borders: Mexico’s ‘Authentic Labor Front’ and Global Solidarity (Boston, MA: South End Press, 2000).
Heneric, O., G. Licht and W. Sofka. Europe’s Automotive Industry on the Move: Competitiveness in a Changing World (Heidelberg: Springer Science, 2006).
Hoechle, D. “Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence.” The Stata Journal 7 (3) (2007), 281–312.
Hosoe, N. “Economic de-integration in North America and foreign direct investment from Japan.” Japan and the World Economy, 61 (2022), 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2021.101114.
INE. Historical state and national presidential elections data (Mexico City: Instituto Nacional Electoral, 2020), available online at https://www.ine.mx.
INEGI. Sistema de cuentas nacionales. Producto interno bruto por entitdad federativa, base 2013 (Mexico City: INEGI, 2019), available online at https://www.inegi.org.mx/sistemas/bie/.
INEGI. Encuesta nacional de ocupación y empleo (Mexico City: INEGI, 2020a), available online at https://en.www.inegi.org.mx/.
INEGI. Anuario estadístico y geográfico por entidad federative. Tasa de participación económica por sexo y entidad federative según grupo de edad. Serie annual de 2000 a 2018 (Mexico City: INEGI, 2020b), available online at http://internet.contenidos.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/productos/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/nueva_estruc/actualizacion_continua/702825107017.zip.
INEGI. Tasa de incidencia delictiva por entidad federativa de ocurrencia por cada cien mil habitants (Mexico City: INEGI, 2020c), available online at https://en.www.inegi.org.mx/temas/incidencia/.
Industria Nacional de Autopartes. Informe 2021 (Mexico City: Industria Nacional de Autopartes, 2022), available online at https://ina.com.mx/.
Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. CS09-2 Escolaridad media (años) de la población por entidad federativa según grupos de edad y sexo. Machine-readable data file (Mexico City: Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación, 2020), available online at https://www.inee.edu.mx/evaluaciones/panorama-educativo-de-mexico-isen/cs03a-escolaridad-media/ (accessed 20 June 2020).
Kopinak, K. “Gender as a vehicle for the subordination of women maquiladora workers in Mexico.” Latin American Perspectives 22 (1) (1995), 30–48.
Küpper, D., K. Kulmann, T. Kazutoshu, A. Arora and J. Schlageter. Shifting gears in auto manufacturing (Boston, MA: BCG Group, 2020), available online at https://www.bcg.com/publications/2020/transformative-impact-of-electric-vehicles-on-auto-manufacturing.
Lévesque, C. “The quest for flexibility in the Mexican auto parts industry: Three tales from a multinational company.” In Flexibility at Work: Critical Developments in the International Automobile Industry, eds. V. Pulignano, P. Stewart, A. Danford and M. Richardson (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 173–193.
Martínez, E. and J. Reyes. “Conflicto sindical en Matamoros: ¿Inicio de la crisis del charrísmo sindical en el siglo XXI?” Trabajo 11 (16) (2020), 203–221.
McKenzie, R. El Golpe: US Labor, the CIA, and the Coup at Ford in Mexico (London: Pluto Press, 2022).
Nguyen, H.G., M. Kuhn and J. Franke. “Manufacturing automation for automotive wiring harnesses.” Procedia CIRP 97 (2021), 379–384.
Polaski, S., K.A. Nolan García and M. Rioux. “The usmca: A “new model” for labor governance in North America?” In NAFTA 2.0. Canada and International Affairs, eds. G. Gagné and M. Rioux (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), 139–156, available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81694-0_10.
Quintero Ramírez, C. and P. Marinaro. “The remaking of the Mexican labor movement in the automotive industry.” Journal of Labor and Society 22 (1) (2019), 9–23.
Roxborough, I. Unions and Politics in Mexico: The Case of the Automobile Industry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
Ruiz Durán, C., E. Dussel Peters and T. Taniura. Changes in Industrial Organization of the Mexico Automobile Industry by Economic Liberalization (Tokyo: Institute for Developing Economies, 1997).
Samford, S. and P. Gómez P. “Subnational politics and foreign direct investment in Mexico.” Review of International Political Economy 21 (2) (2014), 467–496.
Sancak, M. Global Production, National Institutions, and Skill Formation: The Political Economy of Training and Employment in Auto Parts Suppliers from Mexico and Turkey. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).
San Diego Union-Tribune. Segunda victoria para sindicatos independientes en México (1 March 2022), available online at https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/en-espanol/noticias/story/2022-03-01/mexico-registra-2da-victoria-para-sindicatos-independientes.
Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes (SCT). Anuario estadístico ferroviario de la SCT (México, DF: SCT, 2002–2018).
Secretaría de Economía (SE). IED [Inversión Extranjera Directa] trimestral y anual por sector, subsector, rama, subrama y clase de actividad económica — 3363 — Fabricación de partes para vehículos automotores (subramas 33631–33639) (2020), available online at https://datos.gob.mx/busca/dataset/informacion-estadistica-de-la-inversion-extranjera-directa/resource/aadaf51e-db5a-48e8-b9be-9dbbc79911d2 (accessed 19 November 2020).
Stimson, J.A. “Regression in space and time: A statistical essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (4) (1985), 914–947.
Swiecki, B. and D. Menk. The growing role of Mexico in the North American automotive industry: Trends, drivers and forecasts (Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Center for Automotive Research, 2016).
Tuman, J.P. “The political economy of restructuring in Mexico’s ‘brownfield’ plants: A comparative analysis.” In Transforming the Latin American Automobile Industry: Unions, Workers, and the Politics of Restructuring, eds. J.P. Tuman and J.T. Morris (New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1998), 148–178.
Tuman, J.P. “The North American Auto Industry beyond NAFTA: Productivity and Industrial Relations.” Policy Papers on the Americas, Center for Strategic and International Studies Volume 11 (Washington, DC: CSIS Press, 2000).
Tuman, J.P. Reshaping the North American Automobile Industry: Restructuring, Corporatism and Union Democracy in Mexico (London: Routledge, 2003).
Tuman, J.P. Recent trends in the Mexican automobile industry: 2000–2017. Working Paper and data set on union governance (Las Vegas, NV: Department of Political Science, University of Nevada, 2017).
Tuman, J.P. “The determinants of strikes in the Mexican automobile industry, 1980–2012.” Journal of Labor and Society 22 (1) (2019), 45–60.
Tuman, J.P. and C.F. Emmert. “The political economy of US foreign direct investment in Latin America: A reappraisal.” Latin American Research Review 39 (3) (2004), 9–28.
Tuman, J.P. and H. Erlingsson. “Foreign direct investment flows to Mexican states: A study of the automobile industry, 2004–2014.” Growth and Change 50 (3) (2019), 1164–1184.
Tuman, J.P. and H. Erlingsson. “The determinants of Chinese foreign direct investment flows in Mexican States, 2004–2014.” Latin American Policy 11 (1) (2020), 103–125.
US Department of Labor, Bureau of International Affairs. “Notice of Availability of Funds and Funding Opportunity Announcement for Engaging Mexico’s Auto Sector Employers in Labor Law Reform Implementation.” FOA-ILAB-20-01 (Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, 2020).
US International Trade Administration. Automotive Industry, Mexico (Washington, DC: US International Trade Administration, 2022), available online at https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/mexico-automotive-industry.
Vogelsang, T.J. “Heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and spatial correlation robust inference in linear panel models with fixed-effects.” Journal of Econometrics 166 (2) (2012), 303–319.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 132 | 132 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 32 | 32 | 20 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 49 | 49 | 25 |
Due to its size and importance, the Mexican automobile industry was an important topic in negotiations for the usmca agreement. A particularly contentious issue was the allegation that foreign direct investment (fdi) in Mexican parts plants has been facilitated by autocratic unions affiliated with the Confederation of Mexican Workers (ctm). Although this issue has been widely noted, there has been little systematic research on the topic. In this paper, we seek to fill this gap in the literature. Using panel data, we examine the determinants of fdi in the automotive parts sector in Mexico’s 31 states and Mexico City (formerly df) from 2004 to 2018. The study makes four contributions to the literature. First, we demonstrate empirically that fdi in the sector concentrated in Mexican states with a higher lagged unionization rate. Second, controlling for the type of union organization, the study shows that fdi was positively associated with states where the ctm was already well-established in the automobile industry. Alternatively, fdi was negatively associated with states where independent and democratic unions had previously organized. Third, we clarify the conditions under which firms prefer pre-emptive unionization with the ctm to the alternative of union avoidance. Finally, the study points to the importance of education and transportation infrastructure in fdi decisions.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 132 | 132 | 29 |
Full Text Views | 32 | 32 | 20 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 49 | 49 | 25 |