Save

Politics and the Economist-King: Is Rational Choice Theory the Science of Choice?

In: Journal of Moral Philosophy
Author:
HÉlÈne Landemore Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA, Email: landemor@fas.harvard.edu

Search for other papers by HÉlÈne Landemore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This article is another unapologetic contribution to ‘the gentle art of rational choice bashing’. The debate over rational choice theory (RCT) may appear to have tired out; yet RCT is as dominant in political sciences as ever. The reason is that critics typically take aim at the symptoms of RCT’s failings, rather than their root cause: RCT’s very ambition of being the ‘science of choice’. In this article I argue that RCT fails twice, first as a science ofchoiceand then as ascienceof choice. Both failures suggest that political sciences need an epistemologic (re)conversion away from the Platonic ideal of a deductive and universal science of choice toward a more inductive and pluralist paradigm. While advocates of RCT rightly insist that ‘you can’t beat something with nothing’, I take their advice, with a grain of salt: in order for alternatives to appear, the frame of references needs to be modified. I draw a few perspectives for the political sciences.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 517 88 9
Full Text Views 142 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 128 11 0