Scanlon on Responsibility and the Value of Choice

in Journal of Moral Philosophy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This paper examines Thomas Scanlon’s Value of Choice account of substantive responsibility, on which the fact that choice has value accounts both for why people should be provided with certain opportunities and for why it may be permissible, in those cases, to let people bear certain opportunity-accompanying burdens. Scanlon contrasts his view with the familiar one (which he calls the Forfeiture View) according to which it is permissible to require people to bear certain burdens if and only if they have actively chosen those burdens, because of the legitimating force of choice. The paper argues that Scanlon’s account, in its most distinctive version, is at best incomplete and can only justify claims about responsibility for a restricted class of burdens. It then goes on to suggest that, when Scanlon’s account is supplemented so as to be able to generate judgments of responsibility about a wider range of burdens, it is no longer clear that there is a difference between the Value of Choice account and a plausible version of the Forfeiture View.

Scanlon on Responsibility and the Value of Choice

in Journal of Moral Philosophy

Sections

References

10

 See also Scanlon“Promises and Contracts” p. 265 footnote 35.

20

 See Robert NozickAnarchy State and Utopia (Oxford: Blackwell1974) p. 169.

22

Scanlon“Promises and Contracts” p. 267.

24

Scanlon“Promises and Contracts” p. 262.

28

 See Scanlon pp. 261-2 for the claim that the Forfeiture View presupposes a more robust notion of freedom than the Value of Choice account.

29

Scanlon“Promises and Contracts” p. 226.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 8
Full Text Views 4 4 4
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0