Disclosure and Consent to Medical Research Participation

in Journal of Moral Philosophy
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Most regulations and guidelines require that potential research participants be told a great deal of information during the consent process. Many of these documents, and most of the scholars who consider the consent process, assume that all this information must be disclosed because it must all be understood. However, a wide range of studies surveying apparently competent participants in clinical trials around the world show that many do not understand key aspects of what they have been told. The standard view of the conditions for valid consent therefore implies that these people have failed to give valid consent to research participation. In this paper we argue that the standard view is false. The primary function of the requirement that researchers disclose information about a study is the avoidance of illegitimate control over someone’s consent decision, which is a form of fraud.We derive the content and manner of appropriate disclosure by analysing the ways in which the manipulation of information can invalidate consent. Our analysis shows that the informational requirements for valid consent are conceptually distinct and thus unlikely to have identical contents. This implies that consent can be valid when not everything that ought to be disclosed by the person asking for consent is understood by the person who proffers it.

Disclosure and Consent to Medical Research Participation

in Journal of Moral Philosophy

Sections

References

  • 23

    Compare T.M. Williamson“Research, Informed Consent, and the Limits of Disclosure,” Bioethics 15 (2001): 341–363.

  • 29

    Roger Crisp“Well-Being,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition)Edward N. Zalta ed.http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/well-being/; L.W. Sumner Welfare Happiness and Ethics (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1999).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 111 111 20
Full Text Views 163 163 43
PDF Downloads 10 10 3
EPUB Downloads 5 5 3